Ontological Security in Indonesia’s Foreign Policy Formulation
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.62383/aliansi.v2i6.1361Keywords:
ontological security, Indonesian foreign policy, national identity, free and active doctrineAbstract
This article explores the significance of ontological security in shaping Indonesia’s foreign policy formulation. Moving beyond material conceptions of security focused on military, economic, and territorial dimensions it argues that Indonesia’s foreign behavior is deeply influenced by the need to maintain a stable sense of national identity and historical continuity. As the world’s largest Muslim-majority democracy and a leading Southeast Asian nation, Indonesia consistently projects itself through identity-based narratives rooted in anti-colonialism and the “free and active” foreign policy doctrine. Its unwavering support for Palestinian independence, participation in the Non-Aligned Movement, and regional leadership in ASEAN illustrate how ontological security underpins diplomatic consistency and domestic legitimacy. However, the same identity-driven approach can also create friction between ideological commitments and pragmatic interests, particularly in managing relations with major powers such as China and the United States. The study concludes that while ontological security provides coherence and credibility, it also demands adaptive strategies. It recommends identity-sensitive diplomacy, coherent narrative management, strategic flexibility, and inclusive public engagement to ensure that Indonesia’s foreign policy remains balanced between identity preservation and practical global engagement.
Downloads
References
Acharya, A. (2014). Constructing a security community in Southeast Asia: ASEAN and the problem of regional order (3rd ed.). Routledge.
Anwar, D. F. (2010). Indonesia’s foreign policy and the “democratic identity”: Defining and redefining national role conceptions. Asian Journal of Political Science, 18(3), 241–256.
Baldwin, D. A. (1997). The concept of security. Review of International Studies, 23(1), 5–26.
Buzan, B. (1991). People, states and fear: An agenda for international security studies in the post–cold war era. Lynne Rienner Publishers.
Giddens, A. (1991). Modernity and self-identity: Self and society in the late modern age. Stanford University Press.
Huysmans, J. (1998). Security! What do you mean? From concept to thick signifier. European Journal of International Relations, 4(2), 226–255. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354066198004002004
Karim, Y. (2019). Indonesia’s quest for leadership in ASEAN: Identity formation and foreign policy behavior. Asian Journal of Political Science, 27(3), 321–339. https://doi.org/10.1080/02185377.2019.1669472
Mitzen, J. (2006). Ontological security in world politics: State identity and the security dilemma. European Journal of International Relations, 12(3), 341–370. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354066106067346
Rumelili, B. (2015). Identity and desecuritisation: The pitfalls of conflating ontological and physical security. Critical Studies on Security, 3(3), 287–302. https://doi.org/10.1080/21624887.2015.1123705
Steele, B. J. (2008). Ontological security in international relations: Self-identity and the IR state. Routledge.
Subianto, B. (2020). Identity narratives and ontological security in Indonesian foreign policy. Journal of Southeast Asian International Relations, 5(2), 88–104.
Sukma, R. (2011). Indonesia finds a new voice. Journal of Democracy, 22(4), 110–123.
Suryadinata, L. (2017). Indonesia’s foreign policy under Jokowi: Continuity or change? ISEAS Perspective, 38, 1–10.
Walt, S. M. (1991). The renaissance of security studies. International Studies Quarterly, 35(2), 211–239.
Wirawan, P. (2020). Identity and Indonesian foreign policy: An ontological security perspective. Jurnal Hubungan Internasional, 8(2), 145–160.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Aliansi: Jurnal Hukum, Pendidikan dan Sosial Humaniora

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.


