Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Penjual Atas Wanprestasi Dalam Transaksi Jual Beli Tanah Oleh Pembeli dan Akibat Hukumnya
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.62383/aliansi.v2i2.834Keywords:
Cancellation of Sale Due to Default, Legal Consequences of AJB Default, Purchase Deed (AJB)Abstract
Law Number 5 of 1960 concerning the Basic Agrarian Principles Article 5 states that customary law in the context of land sale and purchase adheres to the principles of clarity and cash payment. Therefore, the drafting of a land sale and purchase deed is not mandatory to require full payment as long as both parties agree. However, this often leads to legal issues later, including cases where the seller commits a breach of contract (default). For this reason, the author conducted this study with the following research questions: 1. What are the legal consequences of the sale and purchase deed concerning default in land sale and purchase transactions carried out by the buyer? 2. How is the legal protection for the seller in the event of a default in a land sale and purchase transaction? The theories used to address these research questions are, first, the theory of agreements, and second, the theory of legal protection. This study employs normative legal research. The research approaches used include a legislative approach and a case approach. The legal material collection technique involves identifying and inventorying positive legal regulations, books, journals, and other legal material sources. Legal material analysis techniques are conducted through grammatical interpretation and legal construction methods. The research findings indicate that land sale and purchase transactions under the principles of clarity and cash payment allow for the drafting of sale and purchase deeds even though the transaction has not been fully paid by the buyer. This creates an opportunity for the seller to commit a breach of contract in such transactions, revealing a lack of preventive legal protection for the buyer. The legal consequence of the sale and purchase deed is that it lacks legal force if it can be proven that a breach of contract occurred during its drafting.
Downloads
References
Asikin, Z., & Amirudin. (2003). Pengantar metode penelitian hukum. PT Raja Grafindo Persada.
Darusman, Y. M. (2017). Kedudukan notaris sebagai pejabat pembuat akta otentik dan sebagai pejabat pembuat akta tanah. Jurnal Hukum Adil, 7(1), 46.
Dezytasari, O. R. (2021). Perlindungan hukum bagi penjual dalam perjanjian jual beli hak atas tanah akibat penyalahgunaan keadaan (Studi Putusan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 523 K/PDT/2017). Indonesian Notary, 3(4).
Hadjon, P. M. (1987). Perlindungan hukum bagi rakyat Indonesia. PT Bina Ilmu.
I Dewa Gede Atmadja, & I Nyoman Putu Budiartha. (2018). Teori-teori hukum. Setara Press.
Marizal, M. (2011). Tinjauan yuridis atas praktek pengalihan atau oper kredit pemilikan rumah obyek hak tanggungan [Tesis, Universitas Indonesia], 10-11.
Meliala, Q. S. (1985). Pokok-pokok hukum perjanjian beserta perkembangannya. Liberty.
Mertokusumo, S. (1999). Mengenal hukum (Suatu pengantar). Liberty.
Muchsin. (2003). Perlindungan dan kepastian hukum bagi investor di Indonesia [Disertasi S3 Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Sebelas Maret].
Muljadi, K., & Widjaja, G. (2003). Perikatan yang lahir dari perjanjian. PT. RajaGrafindo Persada.
Nurjannah, T. (2016). Penyelesaian sengketa sertifikat ganda hak atas tanah (Studi Kasus pada Pengadilan Tata Usaha Negara Makassar). Jurnal Hukum, 3(12).
Peraturan Pemerintah Nomor 24 Tahun 1997 tentang Pendaftaran Tanah (LN No. 59 Tahun 1997, TLN No. 3696), Pasal 37 ayat (1).
Rachmad, S. (2020). Hukum perikatan ajaran umum perjanjian. Yrama Widya.
Setiawan, I. K. (2018). Hukum perikatan. Sinar Grafika.
Subekti, R. (2014). Aneka perjanjian. PT Aditya Bakti.
Undang-Undang Dasar Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 1945.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Aliansi: Jurnal Hukum, Pendidikan dan Sosial Humaniora

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.