Tinjauan Hukum Terhadap Wanprestasi dalam Kasus Gagal Bayar pada Platform Fintech Lending Berdasarkan Peraturan Otoritas Jasa Keuangan No. 77/POJK.01/2016
Studi Kasus PT. Crowde Membangun Bangsa
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.62383/aliansi.v2i4.1137Keywords:
Fintech Lending, Peer to Peer Lending, Default, Failure to PayAbstract
The purpose of this study is to determine how the regulation and implementation of legal protection for lenders in cases of default based on the Financial Services Authority Regulation (POJK) No. 77/POJK.01/2016 concerning Information Technology-Based Money Lending Services. This study also examines the form of legal responsibility of the platform organizer, as well as dispute resolution efforts that can be taken by lenders. The research method used is the normative legal method with a statutory regulatory approach and case studies. Data were obtained through literature studies and documentation of applicable legal provisions, as well as relevant documents and reports from PT. Crowde. The analysis was carried out qualitatively-descriptively to assess the suitability between field practices and applicable regulations. The results of the study indicate that POJK No. 77/POJK.01/2016 has not fully provided comprehensive legal protection for lenders in cases of default. Legal responsibility for default is still largely borne by the civil relationship between the borrower and the lender, without any concrete risk recovery mechanism from the organizer. Therefore, it is necessary to strengthen regulations, increase platform transparency, and play an active role for the OJK and the Indonesian Joint Funding Fintech Association (AFPI) in supervising and following up on default cases.
Downloads
References
Ali, A. (2010). Menguak teori hukum (Legal theory) & teori peradilan (Judicialprudence) termasuk undang-undang (Legisprudence) Volume I: Pemahaman awal. Jakarta: Kencana Prenada Media Group.
Asikin, Z. (2012). Pengantar tata hukum Indonesia. Jakarta: Rajawali Press.
Change.org. (2025, Februari 25). Orang meminta pertanggungjawaban pengembalian dana pemodal oleh fintech Crowde yang tak dibayar. https://www.change.org/p/orang-meminta-pertanggung-jawaban-pengembalian-dana-pemodal-oleh-fintech-crowde-yang-tak-dibayar
Crowde. (2025, Februari 23). Platform P2P lending untuk permodalan petani. https://www.crowde.co/ourStory
Ernama, Budiharto, & Hendro, S. (2017). Pengawasan Otoritas Jasa Keuangan terhadap financial technology. Diponegoro Law Journal.
Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Perdata.
Muhammad, A. (2004). Hukum dan penelitian hukum. Bandung: Citra Aditya Bakti.
Nasution, B. J. (2008). Metode penelitian hukum. Bandung: Penerbit Maju.
Otoritas Jasa Keuangan. (2025, Februari 22). Yuk mengenal fintech P2P lending sebagai alternatif investasi sekaligus pendanaan. https://sikapiuangmu.ojk.go.id/FrontEnd/CMS/Article/20566
Peraturan Bank Indonesia Nomor 19/12/PBI/2017 tentang Penyelenggaraan Teknologi Finansial.
Peraturan Otoritas Jasa Keuangan Nomor 77/POJK.01/2016 tentang Layanan Pinjam Meminjam Uang Berbasis Teknologi.
Raharjo, B. (2021). Fintech: Teknologi finansial perbankan digital. Semarang: Yayasan Prima Agus Teknik.
Rato, D. (2010). Filsafat hukum: Mencari dan memahami hukum. Yogyakarta: PT Presindo.
Setiawan, H., Girindra, M., & Evangelista, O. (2017). Aspek hukum finansial teknologi di Indonesia: Regulasi startup fintech oleh Bank Indonesia dalam pelarangan perkembangan penggunaan bitcoin di Indonesia.
Undang-Undang Dasar Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 1945.
Undang-Undang Nomor 19 Tahun 2016 tentang Perubahan atas Undang-Undang Nomor 11 Tahun 2008 tentang Informasi dan Transaksi Elektronik.
Undang-Undang Nomor 8 Tahun 1999 tentang Perlindungan Konsumen.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Aliansi: Jurnal Hukum, Pendidikan dan Sosial Humaniora
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
