Pertanggungjawaban Pelaku Usaha Atas Overclaim di Kandungan Skin Care pada Produk Retinol Serum ElsheSkin

Authors

  • Made Arsia Luna Tantra Universitas Pendidikan Ganesha

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.62383/aliansi.v2i5.1210

Keywords:

consumer protection, e-commerce, ElsheSkin, overclaim, retinol

Abstract

The practice of overclaiming in the skincare industry, particularly through e-commerce platforms, has emerged as a critical concern in the realm of consumer protection law. Misleading product claims, especially regarding active ingredients such as retinol, can not only compromise consumer trust but also pose health risks. This study aims to analyze the legal responsibility of business actors in cases of exaggerated product claims, with a focus on the ElsheSkin case, in which the retinol content was scientifically proven to differ significantly from what was stated on the product label. Employing a juridical-normative and descriptive-analytical approach, this study uses secondary data derived from relevant legislation, expert commentary, regulatory standards, and digital media content. The findings indicate that ElsheSkin’s mislabeling constitutes a violation of the principle of transparency and the right of consumers to obtain accurate product information as regulated in Indonesian consumer protection law, particularly Law No. 8 of 1999. Despite the violation, ElsheSkin displayed a degree of legal and ethical responsibility by conducting a product recall, offering compensation to affected consumers, issuing a public apology, and initiating improvements to internal quality control mechanisms. The case underscores the urgent need for stronger regulatory oversight in the digital marketplace, especially in the skincare sector, where scientific claims can be easily manipulated for marketing gain. It also emphasizes the importance of enhancing public awareness and education regarding product ingredients and their actual effects. In conclusion, while business actors are legally bound to ensure the accuracy of product information, there must also be a collaborative effort between regulators, companies, and consumers to create a more transparent and trustworthy digital commercial environment.

 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Arumbi, N. D., Hermawan, S., & Nugroho, A. (2024). Tanggung jawab pelaku usaha atas overclaim Sun Protection Factor (SPF) pada produk tabir surya X. Amandemen: Jurnal Ilmu Pertahanan, Politik dan Hukum Indonesia, 1(2), 25–34.

Djaja, N. A. A. (2023). Perlindungan hukum terhadap konsumen atas overclaim kandungan tabir surya merek Purito (Doctoral dissertation, Universitas Pelita Harapan).

Djamzuri, M. I., & Mulyana, A. P. (2024). Cancel culture di era media baru: Analisis komunikasi atas implikasi sosial dalam kasus overclaim skincare. Nuansa Akademik: Jurnal Pembangunan Masyarakat, 9(2), 523–534.

Dwitari, D. M., & Kusdibyo, L. (2019, August). Mengukur sikap dan minat beli konsumen terhadap produk skin care dengan menggunakan brand image merek lokal. In Industrial Research Workshop and National Seminar (Vol. 10, No. 1, pp. 686–696).

Fil’Awalin, H., & Hutabarat, S. M. D. (2025). Consumer legal protection for overclaimed skincare products. De Lega Lata: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 10(1), 32–39.

Hingis, K., Karolina, U., & Pribadi, R. (2024). Sentimen analisis overclaim skincare Skintific menggunakan algoritma BERT. Applied Information Technology and Computer Science (AICOMS), 3(2), 1–5.

Isabella, D. A., Aspasari, F., & Maghfiro, M. A. (2025). Pengaruh Dokter Detektif (Doktif) dalam bisnis skincare: Antara kepercayaan konsumen dan kepatuhan hukum. Jurnal Riset Multidisiplin Edukasi, 2(3), 214–224.

Kuncoro, A. A. P. (2024). Perlindungan hukum konsumen terhadap penggunaan kata overclaim pada iklan produk skincare (Doctoral dissertation, Universitas Islam Indonesia).

Kuncoro, A. A. P., & Syamsudin, M. (2024, June). Perlindungan konsumen terhadap overclaim produk skincare. In Prosiding Seminar Hukum Aktual Fakultas Hukum Universitas Islam Indonesia (Vol. 2, No. 3, pp. 73–84).

Mastrini, N. K. A. (n.d.). Perlindungan hukum terhadap konsumen terkait overclaim pada produk perawatan kulit (skincare).

Miru, A. (2017). Prinsip-prinsip perlindungan hukum bagi konsumen Indonesia. Depok: Raja Grafindo.

Ngabito, R. I. P. (2025). Analisis pertanggungjawaban hukum terhadap peredaran produk skincare yang terbukti overclaim. Law, Development and Justice Review, 7(3), 284–301.

Pakaila, J. R., Aydin, R. M., & Abbiyya, S. W. (2024). Tren overclaim dalam iklan industri kecantikan: Analisis etika terapan pada produk skincare di Indonesia. Kabillah: Journal of Social Community, 9(2), 504–510.

Rosmawati. (2018). Pokok-pokok hukum perlindungan konsumen. Depok: Prenadamedia Group.

Sayfudin, M. (2025). Tinjauan Undang-Undang Nomor 8 Tahun 1999 tentang Perlindungan Konsumen dan Maqasid Syariah terhadap overclaim seller TikTok Shop pada produk skincare (Doctoral dissertation, Institut Agama Islam Negeri Kediri).

Downloads

Published

2025-07-29

How to Cite

Made Arsia Luna Tantra. (2025). Pertanggungjawaban Pelaku Usaha Atas Overclaim di Kandungan Skin Care pada Produk Retinol Serum ElsheSkin. Aliansi: Jurnal Hukum, Pendidikan Dan Sosial Humaniora, 2(5), 151–162. https://doi.org/10.62383/aliansi.v2i5.1210

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.