Combat Drones & Legal Framework : A Military Revolution Yet to be Regulated
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.62383/aliansi.v3i2.1614Keywords:
Autonomous Weapons Regulation, Combat Drones, International Humanitarian Law, Military Necessity, Modern ConflictAbstract
The development of combat drones has brought a military revolution in the modern era, enabling military operations with global reach, high precision, and minimal risk to human personnel. However, this innovation raises serious legal challenges, as international humanitarian law (IHL) and traditional norms of warfare have yet to specifically regulate the use of autonomous weapons and long-range strikes. This study employs a qualitative approach based on document analysis, conflict case studies, and legal literature to explore the interaction between military operational logic and international legal principles. The findings indicate that legal boundaries in the use of combat drones often exist in a gray area, where considerations of military necessity and operational effectiveness may conflict with principles of civilian protection and proportionality. Furthermore, the legitimacy of drone use is influenced by public opinion, diplomatic pressure, and international accountability. This article emphasizes that the use of combat drones necessitates adjustments in international law and regulation, as well as a multidisciplinary approach integrating law, technology, and military sociology.
Downloads
References
Bennett, W. L., & Segerberg, A. (2013). The logic of connective action: Digital media and the personalization of contentious politics. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139198752
Cassese, A. (2013). International criminal law (3rd ed., pp. 63-89). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/he/9780199694921.003.0021
Dinstein, Y. (2016). The conduct of hostilities under the law of international armed conflict (3rd ed., pp. 45-68). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781316389591
Entman, R. M. (2004). Projections of power: Framing news, public opinion, and U.S. foreign policy. University of Chicago Press. https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226210735.001.0001
Farrell, T., & Gordon, A. (2009). Military adaptation in Afghanistan. Stanford University Press.
Gross, M. L. (2015). Moral dilemmas of modern war: Torture, assassination, and blackmail in an age of asymmetric conflict. Cambridge University Press.
Henckaerts, J.-M., & Doswald-Beck, L. (2005). Customary international humanitarian law (Vol. 1, pp. 3-8). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511804700
International Committee of the Red Cross. (1949). Geneva Conventions. ICRC.
Kaldor, M. (2012). New and old wars: Organized violence in a global era (3rd ed.). Stanford University Press.
Kaplan, A. M., & Haenlein, M. (2010). Users of the world, unite! The challenges and opportunities of social media. Business Horizons, 53(1), 59-68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bushor.2009.09.003
Krippendorff, K. (2018). Content analysis: An introduction to its methodology (4th ed.). SAGE Publications. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781071878781
Krulak, C. (1999). The strategic corporal: Leadership in the three block war. Marines Magazine. https://doi.org/10.21236/ADA399413
Ragin, C. C., & Becker, H. S. (1992). What is a case? Exploring the foundations of social inquiry. Cambridge University Press.
Robinson, P. (2019). The logic of military necessity in modern conflict. Oxford University Press.
Schmitt, M. N. (2010). Military necessity and humanity in international humanitarian law. Virginia Journal of International Law, 50(4), 795-839.
Slim, H. (2019). Killing civilians: Method, madness and morality in war. Hurst & Co.
Winslow, D. (1998). Misplaced loyalties: The role of military ethics in modern armies. Routledge.
Zegveld, L. (2019). Accountability of armed opposition groups in international law. Cambridge University Press.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Aliansi: Jurnal Hukum, Pendidikan dan Sosial Humaniora
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
