Penerapan Ketertiban Umum Di Kota Gorontalo Menurut Peraturan Daerah No. 1 Tahun 2018 Tentang Ketertiban Umum
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.62383/aliansi.v1i3.189Keywords:
Effectiveness, Order, PeaceAbstract
Problem/Background: Public order and community peace is a description of a situation where people can carry out their daily activities in a calm, orderly and controlled manner, thus supporting the achievement of sustainable development in an area. There are many problems related to public order and peace, one of which occurs in Gorontalo City itself. In Gorontalo, there have been various violations of public order and order, such as violations of loose animals, violations of residence permits, street vendors, distribution of alcoholic drinks, violations of population management, vagrancy, beggars and street children, as well as perverted couples. boarding house. And the most frequent cases in Gorontalo City are violations related to the distribution of alcoholic drinks and exploitation of couples in boarding houses. Objective: The aim of this research is to find out how effective Satpol PP is in ensuring public peace and order i\\n Gorontalo City. Method: The method used in this research is a qualitative descriptive method, where an overview of facts and information in the field is obtained through data collection techniques, namely. observation, interviews and documentation. The sampling technique used purposive sampling and snowball sampling. Results/Findings: The results of this research indicate that maintaining public order and tranquility at the Gorontalo Satpol PP has not been effective. There are many influencing factors, such as the many inhibiting factors found during research.
Downloads
References
Abdul Aziz Hakim, Negara Hukum dan Demokrasi Di Indonesia, Penerbit Pustaka Pelajar, 2011, Celeban Timur (Yogyakarta), hlm. 8
Arikunto Suharsimi, Prosedur Penelitian Suatu Pendekatan Praktik (Jakarta: Rineka Cipta, 2010), hlm. 172
Bambang Waluyo, Penelitian Hukum Dalam Praktek (Jakarta: Sinar Grafika, 2002), hlm.15.
Harun Husen, 1990, Kejahatan & Penegakan Hukum di Indonesia, Rineka Cipta, Jakarta, hal 58.
M. Yahya Harahap, Hukum Acara Perdata, (Jakarta: Sinar Grafika, 2013), hal 56.
Norman K. Denzin, Yvonna S. Lincoln (editor), dan Dariyatno (penerjemah), Handbook of Qualitative Research (edisi ketiga) (Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar, 2009), hlm. 505.
Soerjono Soekanto, 1983, Faktor-faktor yang Mempengaruhi Penegakan Hukum, UI Press, Jakarta, Hal 35.
Soerjono Soekanto, Pengantar Penelitian Hukum (Jakarta: UI Press, 2006), hlm. 9.
Victor Imanuel W. Nalle, 2016, Studi Sosio-Legal Terhadap Ketertiban Dan Ketentraman Di Kabupaten Sidoarjo, Jurnal Hukum & Pembangunan 47 No. 3.
Wicipto Setiadi, “Sanksi Administratif Sebagai Salah Satu Instrumen Penegakan Hukum Dalam Peraturan Perundang-Undangan”, Jurnal Legislasi Indonesia, Volume 6, No. 4, Desember 2009, h. 607.
Zainal Arifin Hoesein, “Pembentukan Hukum Dalam Perspektif Pembaruan Hukum”, Jurnal RechtsVinding Media Pembangunan Hukum Nasional, Volume 1, No. 3, Desember 2012, h. 308.
Peraturan Pemerintah RI Nomor 6 Tahun 2010 Pasal 1 ayat (8)
Undang-Undang Nomor 32 Tahun 2004 tentang Pemerintah Daerah.
Peraturan Menteri Dalam Negeri Nomor 4 Tahun 2011 Pasal 3.
Pasal 3 ayat (2) Satpol PP dan Peraturan Menteri Dalam Negeri Nomor 4 pasal (1) dan (2).
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Aliansi: Jurnal Hukum, Pendidikan dan Sosial Humaniora

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.