Inkonsistensi Mahkamah Agung Dalam Menerapkan Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Merek Terkenal Dalam Sengketa Merek
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.62383/aliansi.v1i5.381Keywords:
Legal Protection, Disputes, Famous Brands, Supreme CourtAbstract
This legal writing aims to examine and analyze the inconsistency of the Supreme Court in providing protection for well-known brands in Indonesia. This research is normative legal research that is prescriptive in nature. The approaches used in this research are the statutory approach, case approach, comparative approach and conceptual approach. This research uses primary legal materials, statutory regulations and Supreme Court decisions relating to well-known trademark disputes as well as secondary legal materials in the form of research results discussing trademark disputes. The results of this research are that the Supreme Court decisions studied in this research conclude that there is inconsistency in the Supreme Court in providing protection for well-known brands. The Supreme Court has not been able to provide an appropriate protection mechanism in dealing with the legal vacuum regarding the definition of a Famous Mark. This has implications for various interpretations in considering the popularity of a brand. The considerations given by the Supreme Court have not shown justice and continuity with the ratification of international agreements regarding the legal protection of well-known marks. Where judges should be able to refer to jurisprudence in resolving famous brand disputes, this research concludes that there are inconsistencies in this matter so that legal certainty has not been created regarding the protection of famous brands.
Downloads
References
Adji, O. S. (1987). Peradilan Bebas Negara Hukum. Jakarta: Erlangga.
Adlhiyati, Z., & Achmad. (2023). Legal Reasoning: How Well-Known Marks Are Positioned Through Legal Positivism. Jurnal Ilmiah Kebijakan Hukum, 17(1).
Adonara, F. F. (2016). Prinsip Kebebasan Hakim dalam Memutus Perkara sebagai Amanat Konstitusi. Jurnal Konstitusi, 12(2).
Agrapana, M. A., Nafiisah, T., & Najdah, H. (2021). Perlindungan Hukum pada Parfum Merek Terkenal yang Mereknya digunakan oleh Toko Parfum Isi Ulang Ditinjau dari Undang-Undang Nomor 20 Tahun 2016 tentang Merek dan Indikasi Geografis. Padjadjaran Law Review, 9(2).
Alfarizi, M. (2021). Penerapan Prinsip-Prinsip Perlindungan Hukum Merek Terkenal Konvensi Paris ke dalam Undang-Undang Nomor 20 Tahun 2016 Tentang Merek dan Indikasi Geografis. Literacy: Jurnal Ilmiah Sosial, 3(1).
Amalia, P. P. (2015). Perbedaan Penerapan Syarat Pembatalan Merek Terkenal antara Pengadilan Niaga dan Mahkamah Agung dalam Kasus Piaget dan Piaget Polo (Studi Kasus Putusan Pengadilan Niaga Nomor 18/Merek/2012/PN.Niaga.Jkt.Pst dan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 762 K/Pdt.Sus/2012). Jurnal Mahasiswa Fakultas Hukum Universitas Brawijaya.
Cahyaningsih, D. T., & Kharisma, D. B. (2023). Role of Intellectual Property Law in Increasing Science Education Capacity in Indonesia. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA (JPPIPA), 9(7).
Donandi, S., & Cakranegara, P. A. (2021). The Implementation of Well-Known Trademarks Doctrine in Indonesian Commercial and Supreme Court. Fiat Justitia: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 15(2).
Harahap, M. Y. (1996). Tinjauan Merek Secara Umum dan Hukum Merek di Indonesia Berdasarkan Undang-Undang Nomor 19 Tahun 1992. Bandung: PT. Citra Aditya Bakti.
Kusaimah. (2022). Perlindungan Hukum terhadap Hak Merek Terkenal di Indonesia. Jurnal Adil, 4(2).
Lumopa, F., Suherman, & Haryanto, I. (2018). Itikad Baik dalam Pendaftaran Merek Terkenal di Indonesia. Jurnal Yuridis, 5(2).
Marpaung, M. (2019). Prinsip-Prinsip Hak Atas Kekayaan Intelektual dalam Ketentuan Hak Merek. Sol Justisio: Jurnal Penelitian Hukum, 1(2).
Marzuki, P. M. (2014). Penelitian Hukum (Edisi Revisi). Jakarta: Kencana Prenada Media Group.
Marzuki, P. M. (2016). Penelitian Hukum. Jakarta: Kencana Prenada Media Group.
Nugroho, R. A., Santoso, B., & Mahmudah, S. (2016). Perlindungan Hukum Bagi Pemegang Hak Merek Dagang Terkenal Asing (Well Known Mark) dari Tindakan Passing Off (Studi Sengketa Kasus GS Atas Nama GS Yuasa Corporation). Diponegoro Law Journal, 5(3).
Pahusa, D. (2015). Persamaan Unsur Pokok pada suatu Merek Terkenal (Analisis Putusan MA Nomor 162 K/Pdt.Sus-HKI/2014). Jurnal Cita Hukum, 3(1).
Purwaka, T. H. (2022). Pelindungan Merek. Jakarta: Yayasan Pustaka Obor Indonesia.
Putra, R. A. (2018). Legal Possibility to Regulate Defensive Mark as Well-Known Mark Protection in Indonesia. Journal of Intellectual Property, 1(1).
Putri, S. C. I., Setlight, M., & Gerungan, A. (2023). Prinsip First to File dalam Pendaftaran Merek Dagang di Indonesia. Lex Privatum, 6(4).
Rohaini. (2018). The Madrid Protocol: Mewujudkan Perlindungan Hukum yang Efektif Bagi Merek Terkenal di ASEAN. Jurnal Media Hukum, 25(1).
Usman, R. (2003). Hukum Hak Atas Kekayaan Intelektual: Perlindungan dan Dimensi Hukumnya di Indonesia. Bandung: Alumni.
Utomo, T. S. (2010). Hak Kekayaan Intelektual (HKI) di Era Global: Sebuah Kajian Kontemporer. Yogyakarta: Graha Ilmu.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Aliansi: Jurnal Hukum, Pendidikan dan Sosial Humaniora
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
