Etika Profesi Hukum: Mengungkap Pelanggaran Kode Etik dalam Kasus Suap Pengacara
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.62383/aliansi.v1i6.555Keywords:
Legal Professional Ethics, Code of Ethics, Bribery, LawyerAbstract
The legal profession in Indonesia carries significant responsibility in upholding justice, particularly through adherence to the Indonesian Advocates Code of Ethics (KEAI). However, violations of this code, such as bribery involving lawyers, often undermine the integrity of the judicial system. This study examines how ethical breaches, particularly in bribery cases, occur and their impact on the legal profession and public trust in the judiciary. Using a normative juridical method, the study focuses on analyzing legal norms that regulate lawyers' conduct, including relevant legislation. Cases such as those involving lawyers Lucas and Fredrich Yunadi highlight how these violations influence court decisions and undermine the principles of justice. The findings reveal that factors such as client pressure and weak oversight from professional organizations contribute to bribery violations. This practice not only damages public trust in the legal profession but also threatens the integrity of the judicial system, which is expected to operate fairly and transparently. Therefore, comprehensive efforts are required to prevent ethical violations, including strengthening oversight, enforcing strict sanctions, and enhancing ethics education for future lawyers.
Downloads
References
Artikel "Dampak suap terhadap kinerja pemerintahan". Media Komunikasi Hukum, 2021.
Beauchamp, T. L., & Childress, J. F. (2013). Principles of biomedical ethics (7th ed.). Oxford University Press.
Bowie, N. E. (1999). Business ethics: A Kantian perspective. Blackwell Publishers.
Crane, A., & Matten, D. (2016). Business ethics: Managing corporate citizenship and sustainability in the age of globalization (4th ed.). Oxford University Press.
Harahap, M. (2021). Manajemen praktik hukum modern. Alfabeta.
Kant, I. (1998). Groundwork for the metaphysics of morals. Cambridge University Press.
Kode Etik Advokat Indonesia.
Luthfi, M. (2020). Peran advokat dalam sistem peradilan. Jurnal Hukum dan Pembangunan, 50(3), 350-367.
Mill, J. S. (2001). Utilitarianism. Prometheus Books.
Mulyana, M. (2018). Etika profesi hukum: Landasan dan implementasi dalam praktik. Penerbit Andi.
Nussbaum, M. C. (2006). Frontiers of justice: Disability, nationality, species membership. Belknap Press.
Peraturan Pemerintah Republik Indonesia No. 53 Tahun 2010 tentang Disiplin Pegawai Negeri Sipil.
Pojman, L. P. (2012). Ethics: Discovering right and wrong (7th ed.). Wadsworth Cengage Learning.
Prasetyo, S. (2019). Teknologi dan hukum: Implikasi bagi praktik hukum di era digital. Salemba Humanika.
Purnamasari, R. (2021). Dampak globalisasi terhadap profesi hukum di Indonesia. Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 17(2), 145-160.
Rawls, J. (2001). A theory of justice (Rev. ed.). Harvard University Press.
Sembiring, J. S. (2015). Korupsi dan penegakan hukum. Jakarta: Penerbit Bina Ilmu.
Singer, P. (2011). Practical ethics (3rd ed.). Cambridge University Press.
Siregar, R. (2020). Pengacara sebagai penjaga keadilan dalam masyarakat. Jurnal Hukum dan Hak Asasi Manusia, 8(1), 75-89.
Soekanto, S. (2014). Pengantar penegakan hukum. Rajawali Pers.
Tavani, H. T. (2016). Ethics and technology: Controversies, questions, and strategies for ethical computing (4th ed.). Wiley.
Tohir, Y. (2022). Advokat dan keadilan sosial: Tanggung jawab moral dalam praktik hukum. Jurnal Advokasi, 12(1), 25-40.
Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia No. 31 Tahun 1999 tentang Pemberantasan Tindak Pidana Korupsi.
Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 18 Tahun 2003 tentang Advokat.
Utami, R. M. (2020). Pelanggaran kode etik dalam pelayanan publik. Jurnal Etika Publik, 12(1), 45-67.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Aliansi: Jurnal Hukum, Pendidikan dan Sosial Humaniora
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
