Industrialisasi Sebagai Kekuatan Politik Negara
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.62383/aktivisme.v1i3.375Keywords:
industrialization, government, power structure, social relations, IndonesiaAbstract
Industrialization has helped the economic growth and progress of many countries, but it is still understood about its effects on government, power structures, and social relations. The study investigates the impact of industrialization on these three components, with particular emphasis on Indonesia. Government has changed significantly as a result of industrialization, which has played an important role in driving industrial growth. To attract foreign investment, improve infrastructure, and improve the business environment, governments have implemented several policies, but there are concerns about their ability to oversee industry and protect the interests of local communities. In addition, the power structure has undergone significant shifts, with the emergence of new social classes and the consolidation of power among certain classes. The industrial sector has also created new opportunities for social mobility, but has also exacerbated economic and social disparities. To solve this problem, this study suggests that the distribution of wealth and power must be fairer. Industrialization, along with increased urbanization and urban growth, has had a significant impact on social relations. The study investigates how industrialization has affected social relationships, including its impact on family structures, community networks, and social identities. So, Indonesian government, power structure, and social relations are heavily influenced by industrialization. Although it has produced significant economic gains, it has also created new problems and differences. This research suggests that a deeper understanding of the impact of industrialization is vital, as are the policies needed to address the social and economic impacts of industrialisation.
Downloads
References
Alamsyah, M. F. P., & Rahaju, T. (2022). Peran Dinas Tenaga Kerja dan Transmigrasi Provinsi Jawa Timur dalam penyelesaian perselisihan hubungan industrial melalui mediasi. Publika, 10(4), 1151–1162. https://doi.org/10.26740/publika.v10n4.p1151-1162
Damayanthi, V. R. (2008). Proses industrialisasi di Indonesia dalam prespektif ekonomi politik. Journal of Indonesian Applied Economics, 2(Mei), 68–89.
Diana, S. R., Ekonomi, F., Agustus, U., Ekonomi, F., & Agustus, U. (2024). Strategi industrialisasi: Analisis struktur industri unggulan pada pembangunan negara. Jurnal Ekonomi dan Pembangunan, 2(3).
Elis. (2013). Dampak industrialisasi terhadap perubahan pola interaksi sosial masyarakat sekitar: Studi kasus di Kampung Babakan Lapang Desa Solokanjeruk Kecamatan Solokanjeruk. Retrieved from https://digilib.uinsgd.ac.id/422/
Rahayuningsih, Y. (2017). Dampak sosial keberadaan industri terhadap masyarakat sekitar kawasan industri Cilegon. Jurnal Kebijakan Pembangunan Daerah, 1(1), 13–26. https://doi.org/10.37950/jkpd.v1i1.2
Rizky, Lucitania, H., & Chusnul. (2020). Kebijakan industrialisasi Bangladesh dalam menarik investasi asing sebagai dampak kebijakan neoliberalisme. Jurnal Transborder, 3(2), 60–72.
Susanto, E. H. (2016). Pesan, komunikasi politik khalayak, kepemimpinan. September 2013.
Tumengkol, S. (2012). Teori sosiologi suatu perspektif tentang teori konflik dalam masyarakat industri. Manado: Universitas Sam Ratulangi.
Zulkarnaen, A. H. (2018). Masalah rawan dalam hubungan industrial dan konsep negara kesejahteraan Indonesia. Jurnal Hukum Mimbar Justitia, 2(2), 806. https://doi.org/10.35194/jhmj.v2i2.32
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Aktivisme: Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan, Politik dan Sosial Indonesia

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.