Efektivitas Sistem Threshold dalam Presidential Threshold di Indonesia

Authors

  • Harlian Satria Wilwatikta Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta
  • Falah Ramadhani Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta
  • Malik Madya Jaya Pratama Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta
  • Dzaqyar Rahmatul Iqbal Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta
  • Fauzan Adhima Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta
  • Hillan Rusydha Fazha Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.62383/aktivisme.v2i1.604

Keywords:

Presidential, Threshold, political, democracy, law

Abstract

The Presidential Threshold is a rule that sets the minimum threshold percentage of votes that a political party is required to achieve, in order to nominate or carry presidential and vice presidential candidates in the election contestation. This system is designed to filter out candidates who are considered qualified, the hope is that only candidates with high electability levels can run. However, its implementation is often a source of controversy because it is considered to hamper potential candidates from small parties or independents who may have quality, but are less known to the public. As a result, the dominance of major parties in the presidential candidacy limits people's choices and does not reflect the existing political diversity. In the Indonesian system of government, where the president and the DPR are independent institutions, the Presidential threshold system is considered incompatible with the principles of inclusive and representative democracy. This provision was first implemented through Article 5 paragraph (5) of Law Number 23 Year 2003 on the General Election of the President and Vice President, and has continued to be used in subsequent presidential elections. This article focuses on the effectiveness of the Presidential Threshold in the Indonesian political context and its impact on political participation, democratic representation, and constitutional law.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Abadi, Songga Aurora, Arsil, Fitra. “Mekanisme Penetapan Ambang Batas (Threshold) Terhadap Stabilitas Sistem Presidensial Dan Sistem Multipartai Sederhana Di Indonesia.” Jurnal Konstitusi Dan Demokrasi 2, no. 1 (2022): 4–5. https://doi.org/10.7454/jkd.v2i1.1202.

Al-Fatih, Sholahuddin. “AKIBAT HUKUM REGULASI TENTANG THRESHOLD DALAM PEMILIHAN UMUM LEGISLATIF DAN PEMILIHAN PRESIDEN.” Jurnal Yudisial 12, no. 1 (2019): 18. https://doi.org/10.29123/jy.v12i1.258.

Azzahra, Farida. “‘Presidential Threshold’ Nol Persen: Solusi Atau Degradasi?” Detiknews, 2022. https://news.detik.com/kolom/d-5904553/presidential-threshold-nol-persen-solusi-atau-degradasi.

Cahyono, Seto. “EFEKTIVITAS PRESIDENTIAL THRESHOLD DAN PENGUATAN SISTEM PRESIDENSIAL DALAM SISTEM MULTI PARTAI,” n.d.

Ghoffar, Abdul. “Problematika Presidential Threshold: Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Dan Pengalaman Di Negara Lain.” Jurnal Konstitusi 15, no. 3 (2018): 483. https://doi.org/10.31078/jk1532.

Ibrahim, Lendy Siar Gibral, and Victor D D Kasenda. “Presidential Threshold Dalam Sistem Demokrasi Indonesia Berdasarkan Undang-Undang Dasar 1945.” Jurnal Mercatoria 1, no. 1 (2021): 141–45. http://www.abdiinsani.unram.ac.id/index.php/jurnal/article/view/376%0Ahttps://kns.cnki.net/kcms/detail/11.1991.n.20210906.1730.014.html%0Ahttps://embiss.com/index.php/embiss/article/view/68.

Ilyas, Karni. “Debat Seru!!! Capres Pilihan Megawati, Atau Pilihan Jokowi, Atau...??? (Indonesia Lawyers Club).” Youtube, 2022. https://youtu.be/fEUrMyS5kgc?si=Af4P5DbnRY2UrtsX.

Kumparan, Tim Redaksi. “Pengertian Demokrasi Menurut Abraham Lincoln Dan Beberapa Ahli Lainnya.” Kumparan, 2023. https://kumparan.com/pengertian-dan-istilah/pengertian-demokrasi-menurut-abraham-lincoln-dan-beberapa-ahli-lainnya-20YtDqdEXgs.

Lestari, Amanda Dea. “RELEVANSI PRESIDENTIAL THRESHOLD 2019.” Universitas Jambi, 2021. https://www.unja.ac.id/relevansi-presidential-threshold-2019/.

Madrim, Sasmito. “Pemilu 2024: Koalisi Orang Kecil vs Koalisi Besar Parpol.” VOA Indonesia, 2023. https://www.voaindonesia.com/a/pemilu-2024-koalisi-orang-kecil-vs-koalisi-besar-parpol/7043952.html.

Patnistik, Egidius. “Mengapa ‘Presidential Threshold’ Dipertahankan Padahal Dinilai Tak Relevan Dengan Pemilu Serentak?” Kompas, n.d. https://nasional.kompas.com/read/2022/08/09/10095061/mengapa-presidential-threshold-dipertahankan-padahal-dinilai-tak-relevan?page=all#page2.

Pemerintahan, Lab Ilmu. “Mengenal Presedential Threshold Dalam Pemilu 2024.” Labip UMY, 2023. https://labip.umy.ac.id/presedentialthreshold/.

Soebanto, Herry. “Ketua DPD: Empat Dampak Negatif ‘Presidential Threshold’ UU Pemilu.” Antara News, 2021. https://www.antaranews.com/berita/2256170/ketua-dpd-empat-dampak-negatif-presidential-threshold-uu-pemilu.

Suluh, Dani. “Presidential Threshold: Pengertian Dan Maksud Penerapannya.” Danisuluhpermadi, 2023. https://danisuluhpermadi.web.id/partai-politik-dan-pemilu/presidential-threshold-pengertian-dan-maksud-penerapannya/.

Wahyuni, Putri Lina, Elidar Sari, and Mukhlis M. “Presidential Threshold Terhadap Pemilihan Presiden Dan Wakil Presiden Republik Indonesia Dalam Sistem Ketatanegaraan.” Jurnal Ilmiah Mahasiswa Fakultas Hukum Universitas Malikussaleh 1, no. 1 (2018): 38–41. https://doi.org/10.29103/jimfh.v1i1.2542.

Wijaya, Asep, Rosmini, and Poppilea Erwinta. “Problematika Hukum Penerapan Presidential Threshold Dalam Pemilihan Umum Di Indonesia.” Risalah Hukum 16, no. 2 (2020): 46. https://doi.org/10.30872/risalah.v16i1.316.

Downloads

Published

2024-11-18

How to Cite

Harlian Satria Wilwatikta, Falah Ramadhani, Malik Madya Jaya Pratama, Dzaqyar Rahmatul Iqbal, Fauzan Adhima, & Hillan Rusydha Fazha. (2024). Efektivitas Sistem Threshold dalam Presidential Threshold di Indonesia. Aktivisme: Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan, Politik Dan Sosial Indonesia, 2(1), 01–10. https://doi.org/10.62383/aktivisme.v2i1.604

Similar Articles

1 2 3 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.