Tinjauan terhadap Kekuatan Eksekutorial Putusan PTUN Pasca Undang-Undang Nomor 51 Tahun 2009
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.62383/aliansi.v2i6.1399Keywords:
Administrative Court, Administrative Sanctions, Dwangsom, Executorial Power, Official ComplianceAbstract
Law Number 51 of 2009 represents a pivotal milestone in strengthening the authority of the Indonesian Administrative Court (PTUN), particularly regarding the executorial aspects of its decisions, which were previously considered weak and insufficient in providing adequate legal protection for the public. This study aims to examine and analyze the executorial power of PTUN decisions following the enactment of the regulation, with a focus on the effectiveness of decision enforcement, the obstacles encountered, and the implications for governance based on the principles of the rule of law. Employing a normative juridical approach supported by analyses of literature, legislation, and selected court decisions, this research demonstrates that Law 51/2009 has brought significant progress, especially through provisions requiring administrative officials to comply with court rulings, the introduction of administrative sanctions, and the application of dwangsom as a coercive measure. However, its effectiveness remains suboptimal due to several persistent challenges, including weak oversight of officials who fail to implement decisions, the limited application of sanctions in practice, and a bureaucratic culture that tends to be unresponsive to judicial authority. Additionally, disharmony among sectoral regulations and insufficient inter-agency coordination further hinder the executorial function of PTUN.
Downloads
References
Asman, S. (2017). Eksistensi peradilan tata usaha negara (PTUN) dalam mewujudkan suatu pemerintahan yang baik. Justice Pro: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 1(2).
Efektifitas pengadilan tata usaha negara dalam menyelesaikan putusan sengketa tata usaha negara. (2023). Jurnal Peradaban Hukum, 1(1), 61–80. https://doi.org/10.33019/jph.v1i1.11
Erliyana, A. (2020). Kekuatan eksekutorial putusan PTUN dan implikasi dalam pelaksanaannya. Pakuan Law Review, 6(2), 42–66.
Hengki, A. M. (2023). Analisis teori keadilan John Rawls terhadap urgensi pembentukan lembaga eksekutorial khusus dalam pelaksanaan putusan PTUN. Jurnal As-Shahifah. https://doi.org/10.19105/asshahifah.v3i2.10470
Hukumonline. (2017). Menguji asas presumptio iustae causa di lingkungan tata usaha negara.
Marzuki, P. M. (2010). Penelitian hukum. Kencana Prenada Media Group.
Pengadilan Negeri Karanganyar. (n.d.). Eksekusi putusan PTUN.
Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara Mataram. (n.d.). Isu-isu hukum acara untuk perubahan undang-undang tentang PTUN.
Perspektif Hukum. (2024). Problematika kepatuhan pejabat tata usaha negara dalam eksekusi putusan PTUN, 24(2), 195–215. https://doi.org/10.30649/ph.v24i2.278
Setiawan, D. (2023). Kekuatan eksekutorial putusan pengadilan tata usaha negara yang dikaitkan dengan asas-asas umum pemerintahan yang baik (Tesis). Universitas Islam Sultan Agung.
Tinjauan yuridis ketentuan sanksi uang paksa (dwangsom) dalam pelaksanaan putusan PTUN berdasarkan Undang-Undang Nomor 51 Tahun 2009. (2025). Jurnal Mahasiswa Fakultas Syariah dan Hukum UIN Suska Riau, 3(4), 1192–1216. https://jom.uin-suska.ac.id/index.php/jurnalfsh/article/view/2694
Undang-Undang Nomor 5 Tahun 1986 tentang Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara.
Undang-Undang Nomor 51 Tahun 2009 tentang Perubahan Kedua atas Undang-Undang Nomor 5 Tahun 1986 tentang Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara.
Undang-Undang Nomor 9 Tahun 2004 tentang Perubahan atas Undang-Undang Nomor 5 Tahun 1986 tentang Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara.
Yulianto, S. (2022). Good governance dan penguatan peradilan administrasi negara. Jurnal Hukum Administrasi Negara, 8(1), 55–73.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Aliansi: Jurnal Hukum, Pendidikan dan Sosial Humaniora
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
