Konsistensi Pertimbangan Hakim Upaya Mewujudkan Kepastian Hukum dalam Sengketa Perdata Kepemilikan Tanah: Analisis Putusan Nomor 16/PDT/2020/PT PLG
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.62383/aliansi.v3i2.1611Keywords:
Consistency of Judges, Court Decision, Land Dispute, Legal Certainty, Legal ReasoningAbstract
This research aims to analyze the consistency of judges' legal reasoning in deciding land ownership disputes and its implications for the fulfillment of the principle of legal certainty. The primary focus of this study is directed at Decision Number 16/PDT/2020/PT PLG, where differences in legal perception or evidentiary evaluation occurred at the appellate level. Land disputes are a crucial issue that requires legal firmness to avoid uncertainty for justice seekers. The research method used is normative legal research with a case approach and a statutory approach. Data were sourced from secondary data consisting of primary, secondary, and tertiary legal materials, analyzed qualitatively. The results show that the consistency of the judges' reasoning in Decision Number 16/PDT/2020/PT PLG depends heavily on the accuracy of assessing evidence, particularly documentary evidence (certificates) and witness testimony. Inconsistency between factual considerations and the application of legal norms has the potential to undermine the principle of legal certainty. This study concludes that strengthening the standards of legal reasoning based on the principle of ex aequo et bono and adherence to civil procedural law is absolutely necessary so that judicial decisions do not only resolve disputes procedurally but also provide certainty of ownership rights for thelitigating parties.
Downloads
References
Agwan, A., et al. (2025). Analisis yuridis normatif terhadap pertimbangan hakim dalam penyelesaian sengketa perdata. Jurnal Riset Multidisiplin Edukasi, 2(12), 1612–1622.
Cahyani, E. D. (2024). Analisis yuridis pertimbangan hakim putusan perdata mengenai gugatan ganti rugi akibat putusan bebas (Studi perspektif hakim Pengadilan Negeri Mungkid) [Skripsi].
Dewanto, P. (2020). Rekonstruksi pertimbangan hakim terhadap putusan sengketa perdata berbasis nilai keadilan. Jurnal Ius Constituendum, 5(2), 303–324. https://doi.org/10.26623/jic.v5i2.2307
Djojorahardjo, R. H. (2019). Mewujudkan aspek keadilan dalam putusan hakim di peradilan perdata. Jurnal Media Hukum dan Peradilan, 88–100. https://doi.org/10.29062/jmhp.v5i1.79
Hasibuan, H. (2024). Kepastian hukum dalam putusan hakim: Studi terhadap inkonsistensi yurisprudensi Mahkamah Agung. YUDHISTIRA: Jurnal Yurisprudensi, Hukum dan Peradilan, 2(3), 76–84. https://doi.org/10.59966/yudhistira.v2i3.1670
Istisofania, A. S., Simbolon, E. Z., & Julydya, P. D. (2025). Analisis tentang kewenangan hakim dalam pemeriksaan perkara litigasi perdata. Multilingual: Journal of Universal Studies, 5(1), 354–368.
Kho, I., & Adiasih, N. (2021). Analisis atas pertimbangan hakim dalam memutus perkara perdata Nomor 304/Pdt.G/2016/PN.Btm ditinjau dari asas ultra petita petitum partium dengan adanya tuntutan subsidair dalam gugatan ex aequo et bono. Jurnal Hukum Adigama, 4(1), 356–376.
Mawey, A. G. (2016). Pertimbangan hakim dalam menjatuhkan putusan lepas dari segala tuntutan hukum. Lex Crimen, 5(2).
Putra, R. H., & Hadiati, M. (2023). Analisis dasar pertimbangan hakim dan akibat hukum dalam menolak gugatan cerai yang tidak dapat diterima (Niet Ontvankelijke Verklaard) di pengadilan dilihat dari perspektif hukum acara perdata. UNES Law Review, 6(2), 4843–4856.
PZ, F. M., et al. (2026). Inkonsistensi pertimbangan hakim terhadap alat bukti elektronik dalam perkara perdata. Sosial Simbiosis: Jurnal Integrasi Ilmu Sosial dan Politik, 3(1), 15–28. https://doi.org/10.62383/sosial.v3i1.2901
Rajab, R. A., Turisno, B. E., & Lumbanraja, A. D. (2020). Sertifikat hak atas tanah dalam kepastian hukum pendaftaran tanah. Notarius, 13(2), 642–654. https://doi.org/10.14710/nts.v13i2.31085
Sherenika, P. (2025). Peran hakim dalam menjamin keseimbangan hak dan kewajiban para pihak dalam proses persidangan perdata. Sriwijaya Journal of Private Law, 155–164.
Wantu, F. M. (2012). Mewujudkan kepastian hukum, keadilan dan kemanfaatan dalam putusan hakim di peradilan perdata. Jurnal Dinamika Hukum, 12(3), 479–489. https://doi.org/10.20884/1.jdh.2012.12.3.121
Wijayanta, T. (2014). Asas kepastian hukum, keadilan dan kemanfaatan dalam kaitannya dengan putusan kepailitan pengadilan niaga. Jurnal Dinamika Hukum, 14(2), 216–226. https://doi.org/10.20884/1.jdh.2014.14.2.291
Yasa, I. W., & Iriyanto, E. (2023). Kepastian hukum putusan hakim dalam penyelesaian sengketa perkara perdata. Jurnal Rechtens, 12(1), 33–48. https://doi.org/10.56013/rechtens.v12i1.1957
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Aliansi: Jurnal Hukum, Pendidikan dan Sosial Humaniora
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
