Analisis Yuridis Tentang Pencemaran Nama Baik

Studi Kasus Luhut Binsar Pandjaitan

Authors

  • Stevanno Sebastian Entoh Universitas Pelita Harapan
  • Sari Mandiana Universitas Pelita Harapan
  • Jusup Jacobus Setyabudhi Universitas Pelita Harapan

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.62383/amandemen.v1i2.146

Keywords:

Defamation, Slander, False Presumption.

Abstract

This research discusses the defamation that has been committed by Haris Azhar (HA) and Fatiah Maulidyianti (FM) who in one of their YouTube video uploads entitled 'There is a Lord Luhut Behind the Economic-OPS Military Relations of Intan Jaya!!! General BIN Also There!! NgeHAMtam' has defamed and caused false suspicion against Luhut Binsar Pandjaitan. It is known that HA and FM called Luhut 'lord'. Luhut also said that material losses do not need to be calculated, but morally, accusing me of being a criminal and being called a 'lord' is very detrimental to him and his family. This research will also discuss the defamation by Haris and Fatiah when viewed from the Criminal Code (KUHP), and Law Number 11 of 2008 which has been amended by Law Number 19 of 2016. This research uses normative / dogmatic juridical research methods. This research uses primary legal materials and secondary legal materials as the legal basis for completing this research. This research also uses the Statue Approach (approach through legislation), Conceptual Approach (conceptual approach), and Case Approach (case approach). In the results of this study, it can be concluded that the actions of HA and FM can be categorized as defamation because they have fulfilled the elements of Article 311 of the Criminal Code on slander and Article 318 of the Criminal Code on false suspicion. The advice in the form of legal opinion is that the prosecutor should be able to provide charges to HA and FM related to Article 311 of the Criminal Code on slander and Article 318 on false pretenses because this can later become the basis for the Judge's decision following the prosecutor's indictment.

 

 

References

Buku

Arief, Barda Nawawi. Pedoman Perumusan/Formulasi Ketentuan Pidana dalam Perundang-undangan. Yogyakarta: Bahan Kuliah Program Doktor Ilmu Hukum Program Pascasarjana Fakultas Hukum Universitas Islam Indonesia, 2006.

Mandiana, Sari. Bahan Ajar Metode Penelitian Hukum. Surabaya: UPH Kampus Surabaya, 2021

Sitompul, Asril. Hukum Internet. Bandung: Pt Citra Aditya Bakti, 2004.

Syahdeini, Sutan Remy. Kejahatan & Tindak Pidana Komputer. Jakarta: Pustaka Utama Grafiti, 2003.

Jurnal

Hilmi Ardani Nasution, Marwandianto. “Hak Atas Kebebasan Berpendapat dan Berkespresi Dalam Koridor Penerapan Pasal 310 dan 311 KUHP (The Rights to Freedom of Opinion and Expression in The Corridors of Article 310 and 311 of KUHP)”. Jurnal HAM. Vol. 11 No. 1 (2020):1-25.

Rahmania Ramadhan, Anna. “Pencemaran Nama Baik Dalam Perspektif Undang- Undang No. 11 Tahun 2009 Tentang Informasi dan Transaksi Elektronik”. Jurnal IUS: Kajian Hukum dan Keadilan 2015: 602.

Sumber dari internet dengan nama penulis

Azizah, Laeli Nur. https://www.gramedia.com/literasi/kerangka-teori/, diakses 16 Juni 2023.

Fadilah, Kurniawan. https://news.detik.com/berita/d-7130148/pertimbanganhakim bebaskan-haris-azhar-fatia-lord-luhut-bukan-penghinaan, diakses 29 Januari 2024.

Thea DA, Ady. https://www.hukumonline.com/berita/a/jaksa-tuntut-haris-azhar-4-tahun-dan-fatia-3-tahun-6-bulan-penjara-lt65522c5898670/?page=2, diakses 29 Januari 2024.

Downloads

Published

2024-03-20

How to Cite

Stevanno Sebastian Entoh, Sari Mandiana, & Jusup Jacobus Setyabudhi. (2024). Analisis Yuridis Tentang Pencemaran Nama Baik : Studi Kasus Luhut Binsar Pandjaitan. Amandemen: Jurnal Ilmu Pertahanan, Politik Dan Hukum Indonesia, 1(2), 127–138. https://doi.org/10.62383/amandemen.v1i2.146