Honor Killing di Afrika Utara: Konstruksi dan Respons Hukum Pidana di Mesir, Maroko, dan Tunisia
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.62383/amandemen.v3i2.1635Keywords:
Family Honor, Gender-Based Violence, Honor Killing, North Africa, PatriarchyAbstract
This article examines honor killing in North Africa as a form of gender-based violence rooted in family honor, patriarchal control, and social change that has not yet produced a stable new order. The research employs normative legal methods through statutory, case, and comparative criminal law approaches across three representative jurisdictions, namely Egypt, Morocco, and Tunisia. The primary legal materials include criminal provisions on homicide, adultery, mitigating excuses, and the protection of women, with particular attention to Article 237 of the Egyptian Penal Code, Articles 418 and 491 of the Moroccan Penal Code, the repeal history of Article 207 of the Tunisian Penal Code, Article 236 of the Tunisian Penal Code, and Law No. 58 of 2017 on Eliminating Violence Against Women. The findings show that honor in this region operates as a social mechanism for regulating women’s bodies, sexuality, mobility, and life choices, reinforced by community pressure, reputational stigma, and family-based moral legitimacy. Social transition does not remove this logic; instead, it reshapes conflict and diversifies forms of control, ranging from threats, confinement, coercion, and the criminalization of sexual morality to homicide itself. On the legal plane, Egypt and Morocco still retain norms that soften criminal responses in certain situations linked to adultery, whereas Tunisia has moved in a more progressive direction by abolishing explicit mitigation and strengthening protection for women, even though the regulation of sexual morality has not been fully abandoned.
Downloads
References
Abuarrah, S. (2025). Framing of Honor Crimes: A Comparative Analysis in Jordan and Lebanon Media Coverage. Sociology Compass, 19(10). https://doi.org/10.1111/soc4.70121
Aksoy, O., & Szekeli, A. (2025). Making Sense of Honor Killings. American Sociological Review, 90(3), 427–454. https://doi.org/10.1177/00031224251324504
Al-Hassan, A.-A. (2023). Impact of Provocation Doctrine in the Crimes of Honor between Retention and Annulment: A Comparative Study of Arab Criminal Legislation. Women & Criminal Justice, 33(1), 46–77. https://doi.org/10.1080/08974454.2021.1976358
Atılgan, E. Ü. (2024). Complicit masculinity of judges. Oñati Socio-Legal Series, 14(5), 1497–1523. https://doi.org/10.35295/osls.iisl.2086
Carline, A., Gibson, M., Singh, S., & Soubise, L. (2024). Civilising loss of control? The role of criminal justice gatekeepers. Legal Studies, 44(4), 612–630. https://doi.org/10.1017/lst.2024.21
Dyer, A. (2023). Criminal law reform and the progressives—the case of provocation. Current Issues in Criminal Justice, 35(1), 180–195. https://doi.org/10.1080/10345329.2022.2097369
Edwards, S. S., & Koshan, J. (2023). Women Who Kill Abusive Men: The Limitations of Loss of Control, Provocation and Self-Defence in England and Wales and Canada. The Journal of Criminal Law, 87(2), 75–96. https://doi.org/10.1177/00220183231165719
Haeg, J. (2024). Provocation, Self‐Defense, and Protective Duties. Philosophy & Public Affairs, 52(4), 465–499. https://doi.org/10.1111/papa.12274
Heenan, K., Bond, C. E. W., & Lockwood, K. (2024). Cultural context and sentencing: content analysis of sentencing remarks for Indigenous defendants of domestic violence in the Northern Territory, Australia. Psychology, Crime & Law, 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1080/1068316X.2024.2376226
Henham, R. (2022). Sentencing Policy, Social Values and Discretionary Justice. Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, 42(4), 1093–1117. https://doi.org/10.1093/ojls/gqac011
Heydari, A., Teymoori, A., & Trappes, R. (2021). Honor Killing as a Dark Side of Modernity: Prevalence Common Discourses, and a Critical View. Social Sciences Information, 60(1), 86–106. https://doi.org/10.1177/0539018421994777
Husak, D. (2023). Six Questions About Overcriminalization. Annual Review of Criminology, 6(1), 265–284.
Hyun, K. (2024). Provocation and the Reasonable Asian: Applying the Reasonable Person Standard to Asian Defendants Asserting the Provocation Defense. German Law Journal, 25(3), 463–480. https://doi.org/10.1017/glj.2024.16
Idriss, M. M. (2022). Abused by the Patriarchy: Male Victims, Masculinity, “Honor”-Based Abuse and Forced Marriages. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 37(13–14), NP11905–NP11932. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260521997928
Kadir, Z. K. (2026a). Narrative Closure in Honor killing Cases: How Judgments Stabilise Meaning, Eliminate Ambiguity, and Produce Sentencing Certainty. Punggawa Law Review, 1(1), 1–10.
Kadir, Z. K. (2026b). Pertanggungjawaban Pidana dalam Honor Killing: Pendekatan Atribusi Peran Pelaku. Konsensus : Jurnal Ilmu Pertahanan, Hukum Dan Ilmu Komunikasi, 3(1), 63–78. https://doi.org/10.62383/konsensus.v3i1.1515
Kadir, Z. K., Mappaselleng, N. F., & Kadir, N. K. (2026). Narasi Kehormatan (Siri’) dalam Perkara Pembunuhan terhadap Perempuan di Sulawesi Selatan. Jurnal Penelitian Serambi Hukum, 19(1), 387–398.
Kennedy, J. (2024). Beyond Judicial Solitude: Listening in the Politics of Criminal Sentencing. Criminal Justice Ethics, 43(3), 225–258. https://doi.org/10.1080/0731129X.2024.2424714
Leuschner, F. (2025). Gender disparities in sentencing filicide in the German criminal system. European Journal of Criminology. https://doi.org/10.1177/14773708251400849
Manikis, M., & Matheson, A. (2024). Communicating Censure: The Relevance of Conditions of Imprisonment at Sentencing and During the Administration of the Sentence. The Modern Law Review, 87(3), 570–603. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2230.12845
Matos, M., Sousa, J., Dias, I., & Santos, M. (2025). Honour-based violence and intimate partner homicide in Portugal. International Journal of Law, Crime and Justice, 100818. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijlcj.2025.100818
Matthee, J. (2024). Influence of the Cultural Defence on Conduct and Culpability in South African Criminal Law. Laws, 13(2), 23. https://doi.org/10.3390/laws13020023
Omran-Randall, A. (2025). Do Judges Obstruct the Legislative Reform to Combat Honor Violence? Understanding the Judiciary’s Role in Perpetuating Honor Violence in the West Bank. Social & Legal Studies, 1177. https://doi.org/10.1177/09646639251339115
Owusu, E. S. (2024). Self-defence Against Metaphysical Witch Attacks: A Legal Conundrum in Anglophone Africa. Criminal Law Forum, 35(2), 153–195. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10609-024-09479-x
Pears, J., & Easteal, P. (2025). Judicial Narratives and ‘Reality’: A Thematic Analysis of References to Family Violence in Sentencing Remarks for the Offence of Threat to Kill. Laws, 14(2), 15. https://doi.org/10.3390/laws14020015
Plesničar, M. M. (2024). The challenges of being imperfect: how do judges and prosecutors deal with sentencing disparity. Frontiers in Sociology, 9. https://doi.org/10.3389/fsoc.2024.1488786
Quintana-Navarrete, M., Fondevila, G., & Cafferata, F. G. (2025). Exploring Gender Disparities in Prosecutorial and Judicial Decision-Making in the Global South: Evidence from Argentina. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 62(3), 474–519. https://doi.org/10.1177/00224278241293755
Ridley, K., Almond, L., Bafouni, N., & Qassim, A. (2023). ‘Honour’‐based abuse: A descriptive study of survivor, perpetrator, and abuse characteristics. Journal of Investigative Psychology and Offender Profiling, 20(1), 19–32. https://doi.org/10.1002/jip.1602
Silver, E., Ulmer, J. T., & Silver, J. R. (2023). Do moral intuitions influence judges’ sentencing decisions? A multilevel study of criminal court sentencing in Pennsylvania. Social Science Research, 115, 102927. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssresearch.2023.102927
Slavković, V. (2023). The Doctrine of Provocation Defence and a Murder Based on Jealousy. Teisė, 127, 159–170. https://doi.org/10.15388/Teise.2023.127.10
Spies, A. (2024). Judging Gender: The Sentencing of South African Mothers Who Murder Their Children. Criminal Law Forum, 35(3), 223–253. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10609-024-09485-z
Zimran, A., & Dagan, N. (2025). Crime, Character, and the Evolution of the Penal Message. Criminal Law and Philosophy, 19(1), 39–60. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11572-024-09732-9
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Amandemen: Jurnal Ilmu pertahanan, Politik dan Hukum Indonesia

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.


