Tinjauan Kritis Kewarganegaraan dalam Perspektif Hukum Tata Negara dan Hukum Islam
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.62383/amandemen.v1i4.625Keywords:
Citizenship, Secured Law, Islamic Law, Human Rights, Social ValueAbstract
This think around focuses to essentially and comprehensively see at the concept of citizenship from the focuses of see of sacrosanct law and Islamic law. Citizenship may be a legal status that characterizes the rights and commitments of an individual interior a state. Inside the setting of sacrosanct law, citizenship is controlled through constitutions and citizenship laws that incorporate distinctive perspectives such as the benchmarks of citizenship (ius soli, ius sanguinis), human rights, and conscious commitments. Sacrosanct law besides considers the measures of vote based framework, value, and adjust in choosing citizenship status. On the other hand, from the point of see of Islamic law, the concept of citizenship isn't because it were seen from a legal-formal point but in addition incorporates moral and ethical estimations. Islamic law gives heading on the commitments and rights of individuals as parcel of the ummah (the Muslim community), based on Shariah measures such as value ('adl), open welfare (maslahah), and the confirmation of fundamental human rights. Besides, Islamic law considers the rights of non-Muslims interior an Islamic state setting through the concept of "ahl al-dhimmah" (guaranteed people) and the benchmarks of minority rights security. This examine grasps a essential and comparative examination approach to evaluate the resemblances and contrasts between these two perspectives. The revelations illustrate that in show disdain toward of foremost contrasts in their philosophical and methodological bases, both secured law and Islamic law share common goals, to be particular the confirmation of human rights and social value. In any case, contrasts inside the interpretation of these concepts can impact the execution of citizenship approaches in several countries. The think approximately additionally highlights the challenges and openings in coordination Islamic law benchmarks into the framework of display day sacrosanct law, particularly in Muslim-majority countries. At final, the examine proposes the require for more genuinely interest talk to realize a concordant agreeable vitality between secured law and Islamic law in controlling citizenship sensibly and comprehensively.
Downloads
References
Abou El Fadl, K. (2003). Islam and the challenge of democratic commitment. Fordham International Law Journal, 27(1), 4–8.
Abou El Fadl, K. (2014). Reasoning with God: Reclaiming Shari'ah in the modern age. Rowman & Littlefield.
Ahmed, L. (1992). Women and gender in Islam: Historical roots of a modern debate. Yale University Press.
An-Na'im, A. A. (1996). Toward an Islamic reformation: Civil liberties, human rights, and international law. Syracuse University Press.
An-Na'im, A. A. (2008). Islam and the secular state: Negotiating the future of Shari’a. Harvard University Press.
Benhabib, S. (2004). The rights of others: Aliens, residents, and citizens. Cambridge University Press.
Bosniak, L. (2000). Citizenship denationalized. Indiana Journal of Global Legal Studies, 7(2), 447–509.
Castles, S., & Davidson, A. (2000). Citizenship and migration: Globalization and the politics of belonging. Palgrave Macmillan.
Coulson, N. J. (1964). A history of Islamic law. Edinburgh University Press.
Emon, A. (2010). Islamic natural law theories. Oxford University Press.
Esposito, J. L., & Mogahed, D. (2007). Who speaks for Islam? What a billion Muslims really think. Gallup Press.
Feldman, N. (2008). The fall and rise of the Islamic state. Princeton University Press.
Hallaq, W. B. (2009). An introduction to Islamic law. Cambridge University Press.
Hallaq, W. B. (2013). The impossible state: Islam, politics, and modernity's moral predicament. Columbia University Press.
Jackson, S. A. (2009). Islam and the problem of black suffering. Oxford University Press.
Kamali, M. H. (2003). Principles of Islamic jurisprudence. Islamic Texts Society.
Kamali, M. H. (2008). Shari'ah law: An introduction. Oneworld.
Kymlicka, W. (1995). Multicultural citizenship: A liberal theory of minority rights. Clarendon Press.
Lane, J.-E., & Redissi, H. (2004). Religion and politics: Islam and Muslim civilization. Ashgate.
Mazrui, A. A. (2006). Islam between globalization and counterterrorism. Africa World Press.
Mernissi, F. (2002). Islam and democracy: Fear of the modern world. Perseus Books.
Modood, T. (2007). Multiculturalism: A civic idea. Polity Press.
Nussbaum, M. C. (2013). Political emotions: Why love matters for justice. Harvard University Press.
Quraishi-Landes, A. (2010). The Sharia problem with Sharia legislation. In R. Ahdar & N. Aroney (Eds.), Law and religion: National, international, and comparative perspectives (pp. 223–227). Oxford University Press.
Ramadan, T. (2004). Western Muslims and the future of Islam. Oxford University Press.
Roy, O. (2004). Globalized Islam: The search for a new Ummah. Columbia University Press.
Salomon, N. (2016). For love of the prophet: An ethnography of Sudan's Islamic state. Princeton University Press.
Sassen, S. (2006). Territory, authority, rights: From medieval to global assemblages. Princeton University Press.
Voll, J. O. (1982). Islam: Continuity and change in the modern world. Syracuse University Press.
Wadud, A. (2006). Inside the gender jihad: Women's reform in Islam. Oneworld.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Amandemen: Jurnal Ilmu pertahanan, Politik dan Hukum Indonesia
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
