Analisa Yuridis Peran Pra Peradilan Dalam Penegakan Hukum Pidana Di Indonesia


  • Moch Adhitya Rifka Wibowo Universitas 17 Agustus 1945 Semarang
  • Sunarto Sunarto Universitas 17 Agustus 1945 Semarang



Pre-trial, Criminal Procedure Law, Law Enforcement


The background of this thesis is based on the role of pretrial which functions as a social control mechanism, its implementation in Indonesia still often experiences violations. Therefore, it is necessary to carry out an in-depth analysis to identify the causes of these violations and find solutions to increase the effectiveness of pre-trials in protecting the rights of individuals who are disadvantaged in the application of criminal law in Indonesia. The problem formulation for this thesis is How pre-trial arrangements are made in positive law in Indonesia ? and What is the function and role of pretrial in criminal law enforcement in Indonesia? The research method for this thesis is Normative Juridical where the author examines phenomena related to Pre-Trial from the aspects of Legislation and Legal Principles. The results of this thesis research are that pretrial arrangements in the criminal justice system in Indonesia are regulated in Law No. 8 of 1981 concerning the Criminal Procedure Code. Pretrial, in accordance with Article 1 point (10) in conjunction with Article 77 of the Criminal Procedure Code, is the authority of the district court to examine and decide on several matters, including whether or not an arrest and detention is legal, the termination of an investigation or prosecution, as well as requests for compensation or rehabilitation. Pretrial has an important role in maintaining the balance of law enforcement powers and individual rights in enforcing criminal law. Its main function is to control law enforcement actions and procedures, ensuring justice and compliance with applicable laws. Pretrial is also closely related to the principle of Habeas Corpus which guarantees that a person must not be detained without a valid reason and must be immediately brought to justice. Through pretrial proceedings, individuals can protect themselves from arbitrary actions by law enforcement and seek redress if their rights are violated. Pretrial and the principle of Habeas Corpus together form an important part of the criminal law system in Indonesia which focuses on justice and the protection of human rights.




Adami Chazawi, Lembaga Peninjauan Kembali (PK) Perkara Pidana, Penegakan Hukum dalam Penyimpangan Praktik dan Peradilan Sesat, Jakarta: Sinar Graha, 2010.

Bambang Sunggono, Metodologi Penelitian Hukum (Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada, 2016).

Darwin, D., Dahlan, D., & Suhaimi, S. (2019). Analisis Yuridis Putusan Praperadilan dalam Perspektif Sistem Peradilan Pidana. Jurnal Mercatoria, 12(1), 68-79.

Kusuma, I. Made Wisnu Wijaya, and Ni Made Sukaryati Karma. "Upaya Hukum Praperadilan dalam Sistem Peradilan Pidana di Indonesia." Jurnal Interpretasi Hukum 1.2 (2020): 73-77.

Lilik Mulyadi, Hukum Acara Pidana ( Suatu Tinjauan Khusus Terhadap Surat Dakwaan, Eksepsi, dan Putusan Peradilan), Bandung: PT Citra Aditya Bakti.

Sutikna, “Implementasi Praperadilan Dalam Melindungi Hak-Hak Tersangka Dan Pihak Ketiga Di Pengadilan Negeri Sleman”, Tesis, Program Magister Ilmu Hukum Program Pascasarjana Fakultas Hukum Universitas Islam Indonesia 2016.


Tanusubroto, Peranan Prapeeradilan Dalam Hukum Acara Pidana, Alumni, Bandung.1982.

Yahya Harahap M,.Pembahasan Permasalahan dan Penerapan KUHAP Pemeriksaan Sidang Pengadilan, Banding, Kasasi dan Peninjauan Kembali, Edisi Kedua,Sinar Grafika, Jakarta.2006. hal.75

WEBSITE di akses pada 29 Desember 2023

MaPPI FH UI, “Problematika Praperadilan di Indonesia” tersedia di diakses pada 29 Desember 2023

S. Tanusubroto, Peranan Praperadilan Dalam Hukum Acara Pidana (Alumni 1983). file:///C:/Users/asus/Downloads/1953-17551-1- PB.pdf. akses pada tanggal 29 Desember 2023




How to Cite

Moch Adhitya Rifka Wibowo, & Sunarto Sunarto. (2024). Analisa Yuridis Peran Pra Peradilan Dalam Penegakan Hukum Pidana Di Indonesia. Terang : Jurnal Kajian Ilmu Sosial, Politik Dan Hukum, 1(1), 306–320.

Similar Articles

1 2 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.