Ingkar Janji Menikahi sebagai Perbuatan Melawan Hukum: Kajian Putusan No. 18/PDT.G/2023/PN MGG
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.62383/aktivisme.v2i2.813Keywords:
Marriage Promise Breach, Unlawful Act, Judicial Considerations, CompensationAbstract
This research aims to analyze the legal status of marriage promises within the perspective of unlawful acts (PMH) according to the Indonesian civil law system, and to examine judicial considerations in determining legal liability and compensation in cases of marriage promise breaches in Decision Number 18/Pdt.G/2023/PN Mgg. This study employs a normative approach with a case study method. The findings demonstrate that breaking a marriage promise can be qualified as an unlawful act if it meets the elements of Article 1365 of the Civil Code (KUH Perdata), namely the presence of an unlawful act, fault, damages, and causality. In Decision Number 18/Pdt.G/2023/PN Mgg, the judge ruled that the breach of marriage promise resulting in material and immaterial losses can be sued as an unlawful act. The judge's considerations include analysis of evidence, causal relationships, and the impact of damages suffered by the plaintiff. This decision emphasizes the importance of legal protection for individuals harmed by marriage promise breaches.
Downloads
References
Abdulkadir, M. (2004). Hukum dan penelitian hukum. Bandung: Citra Aditya Bakti.
Agustina, R. (2003). Perbuatan melawan hukum (Master’s thesis). Universitas Indonesia Fakultas Hukum Pascasarjana, Jakarta.
Anjani, A. S., dkk. (2024). Analisis yuridis ingkar janji untuk menikahi sebagai perbuatan melawan hukum menurut Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Perdata. Lex Privatum, 13(1), 113.
Belair, A. R. (2003). Shopping for your self: When marketing becomes a social problem (Doctoral dissertation). Concordia University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
Fahmi, D. (2023). Perbuatan melawan hukum dalam janji menikah: Kajian yuridis terhadap pelanggaran moral dan hukum. Jurnal Hukum dan Etika, 14(3), 59–70.
Fuady, M. (2005). Perbuatan melawan hukum: Pendekatan kontemporer (2nd ed.). Bandung: Mandar Maju.
Husen, A. (2022). Perbuatan ghosting berupa pembatalan janji menikah (Undergraduate thesis). Universitas Islam Negeri Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta. Retrieved from https://repository.uinjkt.ac.id.
Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Acara Perdata.
Lindawati. (2015). Analisis faktor yang mempengaruhi perilaku ekonomi dan kesejahteraan rumah tangga petani usahatani terpadu padi-sapi di Provinsi Jawa Barat (Master’s thesis). Institut Pertanian Bogor. Retrieved from http://repository.ipb.ac.id/handle/123456789/85350.
Mahkamah Agung Republik Indonesia. (2020). Putusan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 1644 K/Pdt/2020.
Marzuki, P. M. (2021). Penelitian hukum. Jakarta: Kencana.
Putusan Pengadilan Negeri Magelang Nomor 18/Pdt.G/2021/PN Mgg.
Setiawan. (1992). Aneka masalah hukum dan hukum acara perdata. Bandung: Alumni.
Sutasoma, C. G. (2021). Pengingkaran janji kawin sebagai kualifikasi perbuatan melawan hukum. Jurnal Yustitia, 15(1), 61-74.
Wibowo, A. (2020). Akibat hukum terhadap ingkar janji untuk menikah. Jurnal Review, 11(2), 78-86.
Zimmermann, J. (2020). Die rechtlichen Folgen der Nichterfüllung von Eheschließungsversprechen im deutschen Recht. Zeitschrift für Recht und Ethik.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Aktivisme: Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan, Politik dan Sosial Indonesia
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
