Urgensi Pengaturan Blokchain dalam Sistem Verifikasi E-Meterai pada Kontrak Digital di Indonesia
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.62383/aliansi.v3i2.1634Keywords:
Blokchain, Digital Contract, E-Stamp, Legal Certainty, Normative VacuumAbstract
The rapid adoption of digital contracts in Indonesia demands a reliable document authentication system, one of which is through electronic stamps (e-meterai). However, the current e-meterai verification system remains centralized and exclusively managed by Perum Peruri, making it vulnerable to single point of failure risks and data manipulation. Blokchain technology, with its characteristics of decentralization, transparency, and data immutability, offers a technical solution that could potentially strengthen the integrity of this verification system. This article aims to examine the legal position of blokchain technology within Indonesia's existing e-meterai regulatory framework and to analyze the urgency of establishing specific regulations governing its use. The research employs a normative juridical method through statutory and conceptual approaches. The findings reveal that blokchain currently occupies a legal grey area: technically compatible with the validity requirements of agreements under Article 1320 of the Civil Code and meeting the criteria for Electronic Information under Article 5 of the ITE Law, yet formally lacking explicit recognition due to its conflict with Perum Peruri's monopolistic authority established under Law Number 10 of 2020 on Stamp Duty. Four normative gaps are identified, encompassing the absence of evidentiary guarantees for blokchain-verified documents, the lack of mandatory standards for Electronic Certification Providers, the ambiguity in civil liability allocation for automated system failures, and the conflict between blokchain's immutability and the right to erasure under the Personal Data Protection Law. Comprehensive specific regulations constitute an urgent normative necessity to ensure legal certainty for Indonesia's digital contract ecosystem.
Downloads
References
Benuf, K., & Azhar, M. (2020, April 1). Metodologi Penelitian Hukum sebagai Instrumen Mengurai Permasalahan Hukum Kontemporer. Jurnal Gema Keadilan, 7(1), 20–33. https://doi.org/10.14710/gk.2020.7504
Habibah, A. (2024, December). Implementasi Blokchain dalam Meningkatkan Kepastian Hukum dan Penyelesaian Sengketa Kontrak di Indonesia. Jurnal Hukum Mimbar Justitia, 10(2), 386–395. https://doi.org/10.35194/jhmj.v10i2.4812
Hadiwibowo, Y. T., Hasan, H. U., & Rosmidah. (2024). Perlindungan Hukum Karya Cipta dengan Teknologi Blokchain dalam Kerangka Hukum Hak Kekayaan Intelektual di Indonesia. ARBITER: Jurnal Ilmiah Magister Hukum, 6(2), 209–218. https://doi.org/10.31289/arbiter.v6i2.4198
Kawengian, V. M., Tampamguma, M. Y., & Tampongangoy, G. H. (2024, September 16). Tinjauan Hukum Peran Bank Sentral Terhadap Penggunaan Teknologi Blokchain dalam Transaksi Keuangan di Indonesia. Lex Privatum, 14(2), 1–16.
Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Perdata (KUHPerdata).
Martinelli, I., Tsabita, N. M., Putri, A. F., & Novela, D. (2024, June 21). Legalitas dan Efektivitas Penggunaan Teknologi Blokchain Terhadap Smart Contract Pada Perjanjian Bisnis di Masa Depan. UNES Law Review, 6(4), 10761–10776. https://doi.org/10.31933/unesrev.v6i4.2049
Megawati, L., Wiharma, C., & Hasanudin, A. (2023, December 31). Peran Teknologi Blokchain dalam Meningkatkan Keamanan dan Kepastian Hukum dalam Transaksi Kontrak di Indonesia. Jurnal Hukum Mimbar Justitia, 9(2), 410–435. https://doi.org/10.35194/jhmj.v9i2.3856
Melisa, D., & Syuryani. (2026, February 21). Implikasi Perkembangan Teknologi Blokchain terhadap Keabsahan Alat Bukti Perkara Perdata. Jurnal Riset Rumpun Ilmu Sosial, Politk dan Humaniora (JURRISH), 5(2), 847–861. https://doi.org/10.55606/jurrish.v5i2.8523
Peraturan Menteri Keuangan Nomor 4/PMK.03/2021 tentang Tata Cara Pengelolaan E-Meterai.
Peraturan Menteri Komunikasi dan Digital Nomor 11 Tahun 2022 tentang Tata Kelola Penyelenggara Sertifikasi Elektronik.
Peraturan Pemerintah Nomor 71 Tahun 2019 tentang Penyelenggaraan Sistem dan Transaksi Elektronik.
Sakirman, Akib, M., & Umar, W. (2024, December 7). Kepastian Hukum Smart Contract dalam Perspektif Hukum Perdata. Jurnal Hukum Lex Generalis, 5(10), 1–20. https://ojs.rewangrencang.com/index.php/JHLG/article/view/617
Sinaga, B. B., & Azzura, R. P. (2024, June 28). Peran Teknologi Blokchain Sebagai Instrumen Pembangunan Penegakan Hukum Berbasis Digital & Mewujudkan Masyarakat Berkeadilan di Era Society 5.0. Padjadjaran Law Review, 12(1), 68–80. https://doi.org/10.56895/plr.v12i1.1651
Soroinda, D. L., & Nasution, A. R. (2022). Kekuatan Pembuktian Alat Bukti Elektronik dalam Hukum Acara Perdata. Jurnal Hukum & Pembangunan (Universitas Indonesia), 52(2), 1–20. https://scholarhub.ui.ac.id/jhp/vol52/iss2/4
Sudarto. (2025, March 11). Smart Contracts From a Civil Law Perspective: Validity and Implementation in Indonesia. Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum Dirgantara, 15(2), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.35968/jihd.v15i2.1444
Undang-Undang Nomor 10 Tahun 2020 tentang Bea Meterai.
Undang-Undang Nomor 11 Tahun 2008 jo. UU Nomor 19 Tahun 2016 jo. UU Nomor 1 Tahun 2024 tentang Informasi dan Transaksi Elektronik.
Undang-Undang Nomor 27 Tahun 2022 tentang Pelindungan Data Pribadi.
Wahyuni, H. A., Naili, Y. T., & Ruhtiani, M. (2023, February 14). Penggunaan Smart Contract Pada Transaksi E-Commerce Dalam Perspektif Hukum Perdata di Indonesia. Jurnal Hukum In Concerto, 2(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.35960/inconcreto.v2i1.1018
Wulandari, A. H., & Priyono, E. A. (2025, July 7). Validity of Electronic Contracts as Evidence in the Settlement of Civil Disputes. International Journal of Social Science and Human Research, 8(7), 5319–5323. https://doi.org/10.47191/ijsshr/v8-i7-48
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Aliansi: Jurnal Hukum, Pendidikan dan Sosial Humaniora

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.


