Pidana Minimum Khusus dalam Tindak Pidana Korupsi: Kajian ASTACITA Atas Independensi Hakim Pasca Putusan MK No. 25/PUU-XIV/2016
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.62383/demokrasi.v2i3.1044Keywords:
Minimum Sentence, Corruption, Judicial Independence, Constitutional Court Decision, ASTACITAAbstract
The specific minimum sentence in corruption crimes aims to provide a deterrent effect and guarantee legal certainty. However, after the Constitutional Court Decision No. 25/PUU-XIV/2016, there has been a shift in the sentencing paradigm, where judges are given discretionary space to consider substantive justice even though the minimum sentence provisions still apply. This study uses a normative juridical method with a statutory regulatory approach and case studies, and is analyzed using the ASTACITA framework. The results of the study show that the Constitutional Court's decision strengthens the independence of judges but also opens up the potential for disparity in sentencing and legal uncertainty, especially in cases involving justice collaborators. This study emphasizes the importance of a balance between legal certainty and substantive justice, as well as the urgency of national sentencing guidelines to prevent deviations in discretion. ASTACITA is used as a normative basis in measuring the proportionality and accountability of sentencing in the corruption criminal law system in Indonesia.
Downloads
References
Dimas Indianto Wahyudi, Nyoman Serikat Putra Jaya, P. (2021). IMPLEMENTASI DASAR PERTIMBANGAN JAKSA PENUNTUT UMUM TERHADAP TERDAKWA KASUS TINDAK PIDANA KORUPSI ( Studi di Kejaksaan Negeri Semarang ). Diponegoro Law Journal, 10, 96–107.
Faturachman, F. A., Hutasoit, T. J. ., & Hosnah, A. U. (2024). Pertanggungjawaban dan Penegakan Hukum Pidana Korporasi dalam Tindak Pidana Korupsi di Indonesia. AKADEMIK: Jurnal Mahasiswa Humanis, 4(2), 197–212. https://doi.org/10.37481/jmh.v4i2.731
Gazal-Ayal, O., & Emmanuel, N. (2023). How Minimum Sentences Benefit Offenders—The Case of Suspended Sentences. Law & Social Inquiry, 48(3), 847–880.
Hasan, N. M. P. P. Z. (2022). Pertimbangan Hakim Dalam Mengabulkan Justice Collaborator Terhadap Terdakwa Yang Melakukan Tindak Pidana Korupsi. Muhammadiyah Law Review, 6(1), 47–53.
Janderová, J., & Hubálková, P. (2021). Legal Certainty-Protected Values and Partial Objectives: The Case of the Czech Republic. Cent. Eur. Pub. Admin. Rev., 19, 63.
Manova, N. S. (2022). The model of the prosecutor’s activities in criminal proceedings: key challenges and opportunities for reform. Pravovaya Paradigma, 21(2), 43–50.
Marchenko, G. V, Zabarin, A. V, & Chimarov, S. Y. (2022). Forming of Public Confidence in the Activities of Law Enforcement Bodies. Administrative Consulting, 2.
Noviacahyani, W., & Sudarti, E. (2022). Dasar Pertimbangan Hakim dalam Menjatuhkan Pidana Pelaku Tindak Pidana Korupsi. PAMPAS: Journal of Criminal Law, 3(3), 264–282.
Nugraha, R. S. (2020). PALAR (Pakuan Law Review) MENTERI JULIARI BATUBARA). Journal Unpak, 06, 59–73. https://journal.unpak.ac.id/index.php/palar
Purba, D., & Ablisar, M. (2022). Implementation of the Constitutional Court Decision No: 21/PUU-XII/2015 of 28 April 2015 Concerning Suspect Identification as a Pretrial Object. Second International Conference on Public Policy, Social Computing and Development (ICOPOSDEV 2021), 312–318.
Putri, E. A. (2022). Penerapan Sanksi Pidana terhadap Pelaku Tindak Pidana Korupsi Ditinjau dari Perspektif Konsep Hukum Progresif. Jurnal Keamanan Nasional, 8(1), 240–256.
Sudarti, E., & Lasmadi, S. (2021). Harmonisasi sistem pemidanaan dan tujuan pemidanaan pada tindak pidana korupsi suap. Pandecta, 16(1), 173–185.
Suroya, Z., & Astuti, P. (2023). Pengurangan Pidana Tindak Pidana Korupsi Sebagaimana Yang Diatur Dalam Uu No.1 Tahun 2023 Tentang Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana. 1.
Usman, A., Hassan, M., & Sial, A. (2022). Independence of judiciary leading justice system to injudicious outline. Journal of Law & Social Studies (JLSS), 4(2), 233–246.
Wibowo, A., & Widiyasmoko, I. A. (2021). Pertimbangan Hakim dalam Penjatuhan Pidana di Bawah Minimum Khusus: Studi Perkara Tindak Pidana Narkotika. Undang: Jurnal Hukum, 4(2), 345–369. https://doi.org/10.22437/ujh.4.2.345-369
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Demokrasi: Jurnal Riset Ilmu Hukum, Sosial dan Politik
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
