Analisis Perbandingan Regulasi Prinsip Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) Antar Negara Indonesia dan India
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.62383/demokrasi.v2i3.1177Keywords:
Corporate Social Responsibility, CSR, Indonesia, India, Regulation, Legal ComparisonAbstract
Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) has evolved from a voluntary initiative into a legal obligation in many countries, including Indonesia and India. This study aims to analyze and compare the CSR regulations between the two countries, focusing on legal foundations, scope of implementation, corporate obligations, and the effectiveness of enforcement. In Indonesia, CSR is regulated under Law No. 40 of 2007 on Limited Liability Companies and Law No. 25 of 2007 on Capital Investment, which mandate companies operating in the natural resource sector to carry out social and environmental responsibilities. Meanwhile, in India, CSR obligations are more broadly applied through the Companies Act 2013, which requires companies meeting specific financial criteria to allocate at least 2% of their average net profits towards CSR activities. The results of this study indicate that CSR regulation in India is more structured and comprehensive compared to Indonesia, particularly in terms of reporting mechanisms, monitoring, and legal sanctions. This comparison provides valuable insight for developing a more effective and equitable CSR regulatory model that benefits society, corporations, and the state.
Downloads
References
Company Act (India), 2013.
Djarum Foundation. (2024, Mei 9). Program. https://www.djarumfoundation.org/program/
Feronika, E. S., Silvia, K. R., & Raharjo, S. T. (2020). Tanggung jawab sosial perusahaan bidang lingkungan. Prosiding Penelitian & Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat, 7(1).
Frederick, W. C. (2006). Corporation, be good: The story of corporate social responsibility. Indiana Polis: Dog Ear Publishing.
Garg, G. (n.d.). Dampak sosial tanggung jawab sosial perusahaan di India. Radix: Jurnal Internasional Perbankan, Keuangan dan Akuntansi, 3(1). https://www.researchgate.net/publication/284030226_Corporate_Social_Responsibility_CSR_in_India_A_Review
Hukum Online. (2024, Mei 9). Mendorong penegakan sanksi perusahaan tidak menunaikan CSR. https://www.hukumonline.com/berita/a/mendorong-penegakan-sanksi-perusahaan-tidak-menunaikan-csr-lt64c09fe1bfdb9/?page=3
Jaysawal, N., & Saha, S. (2015). Space and culture India, 3(2). India: ACCB Publishing.
Jonker, J., & de Witte, M. (n.d.). Tantangan pengorganisasian dan implementasi tanggung jawab sosial perusahaan. New York: Palgrave MacMillan. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/284030226_Corporate_Social_Responsibility_CSR_in_India_A_Review
Kozáková, J., et al. (2024). Differences in corporate social responsibility implementation between Slovak and Czech companies. Problems and Perspectives in Management, 22(1). Ukraine: LLC “Consulting Publishing Company “Business Perspectives”.
Marthin, M. B. S., & Akim, I. (2017). Implementasi prinsip corporate social responsibility (CSR) berdasarkan Undang-Undang Nomor 40 Tahun 2007 tentang Perseroan Terbatas. Journal of Private and Commercial Law, 1(1).
Michael, R., Raharjo, S. T., & Resnawaty, R. (2019). Program CSR Yayasan Unilever Indonesia berdasarkan teori triple bottom line. Jurnal Pekerjaan Sosial, 2(1).
Nayenggita, G. B., Raharjo, S. T., & Resnawaty, R. (2019). Praktik corporate social responsibility (CSR) di Indonesia. Jurnal Pekerjaan Sosial, 2(1).
Pathak, A. S., et al. (n.d.). Does ownership influence corporate social responsibility (CSR)? A study of post-CSR law implementation in India. Journal of Law and Sustainable Development, 12(1), 5.
Peraturan Pemerintah Republik Indonesia Nomor 47 Tahun 2012 tentang Tanggung Jawab Sosial dan Lingkungan Perseroan Terbatas.
Religa, A. M. (2019). Permasalahan hukum tanggung jawab sosial perusahaan (corporate social responsibility) di Indonesia. University of Bengkulu Law Journal, 4(2).
Rumambi, H., Kaligis, S., Tangon, J., & Marentek, S. (2018). The implementation model of corporate social responsibility (CSR): An Indonesian perspective. International Journal of Academic Research in Business & Social Sciences, 8(10).
Sefriani, & Wartini, S. (2017). Model kebijakan hukum tanggung jawab sosial perusahaan di Indonesia. Jurnal Hukum IUS QUIA IUSTUM, 24(1).
Semiawan, C. R. (2015). Metode penelitian kualitatif: Jenis, karakteristik dan keunggulannya. Jakarta: PT Grasindo.
Setiawati, R., Noviarti, H., Suhendar, & Siregar, I. F. (2023). The use of management control system in corporate social responsibility (CSR) strategy implementation and CSR activities on sustainability reporting. Journal of Law and Sustainable Development, 11(11).
Soekanto, S., & Mamudji, S. (2001). Penelitian hukum normatif: Suatu tinjauan singkat. Jakarta: PT Raja Grafindo Persada.
Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 25 Tahun 2007 tentang Penanaman Modal.
Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 40 Tahun 2007 tentang Perseroan Terbatas.
Yusuf, M. Y. (2017). Islamic corporate social responsibility (I-CSR) pada lembaga keuangan syariah (LKS): Teori dan praktik. Depok: Kencana.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Demokrasi: Jurnal Riset Ilmu Hukum, Sosial dan Politik
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
