Peran Penyidik dalam Menjamin Hak Tersangka : Kajian terhadap Implementasi KUHAP dalam Tahap Penyidikan

Authors

  • Syarif Hidayatulloh Universitas Primagraha
  • Sigit Kamseno Universitas Primagraha

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.62383/demokrasi.v2i3.1218

Keywords:

Criminal Procedure Code, fast prosecution, investigators, investigation, suspects' right

Abstract

In a criminal justice system that upholds the principle of justice, the protection of suspects' rights is a crucial and fundamental component. Investigators play a crucial role in ensuring suspects' rights are protected during the investigation process, including the right to legal counsel, the right to access information, and the right to be free from arbitrary prosecution. The aim of this study is to explore the role of investigators in guaranteeing these rights and highlight challenges in their implementation. The study revealed that many suspects did not receive legal assistance from the beginning of the examination, lacked understanding of their rights, and faced investigations that often violated due process of law. This problem is exacerbated by limited human resources, inadequate internal oversight, and lack of ongoing training for investigators. These factors contribute to the failure to enforce the rights of suspects as a whole, which impacts the fairness and integrity of the legal process. In an effort to realize a fast, simple, and inexpensive judicial process, as promised in Law Number 48 of 2009, this study emphasizes the need for reforms to strengthen the investigation process. The reforms include improvements in the aspects of supervision and more in-depth training of investigators on human rights, so that they can better understand and implement the protection of the rights of suspects. In addition, the use of technology in investigations, such as digital-based information systems to manage evidence and legal processes, can increase transparency and accuracy in every stage of investigation. Strengthening internal supervision mechanisms is also very important to minimize abuse of authority by investigators. On the other hand, it is important to periodically evaluate the application of standard operating procedures (SOPs) in investigations, in order to ensure compliance with applicable laws and provide justice for suspects.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Andi Kalsum, B., Badaru, B., & Baharuddin, H. (2020). Efektivitas penerapan hak-hak tersangka/terdakwa dalam proses penyidikan perkara pidana: Studi di Kejaksaan Negeri Wajo. Jurnal of Lex Generalis (JLS), 1, 70-87.

Fariz, L. M. (2024). Undang-Undang Nomor 48 Tahun 2009 tentang Kekuasaan Kehakiman. Lembaran Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 2009 Nomor 157.

Maulida, G. (2025). Korelasi antara hukum adat dan restorative justice: Membangun keadilan berbasis kearifan lokal di Indonesia. Pikukuh: Jurnal Hukum dan Kearifan Lokal, 2(1), 20-28. https://doi.org/10.62870/pkh.v1i1.29382

Raihan, M. F. L. (2024). Analisis perlindungan hak tersangka dalam proses penyidikan. Causa: Jurnal Hukum dan Kewarganegaraan, 6(11), 21-30. https://doi.org/10.3783/causa.v6i11.6470

Romdoni, M. (2024). Legal accountability for police members involved in narcotics crimes. LEGAL BRIEF, 13(1), 32-41. https://doi.org/10.35335/legal.v13i1.921

Romdoni, M., & Putri Abu Bakar, A. (2022). The role of the justice collaborator in a premeditated murder crime. LEGAL BRIEF, 11(5), 3033-3041. https://doi.org/10.35335/legal.v11i5.589

Rozi, M. M. (2019). Studi kasus sistem peradilan pidana terhadap anak pelaku tawuran antar pelajar pada tahap penyidikan. Jurnal Hukum Mimbar Justitia, 5(2), 91. https://doi.org/10.35194/jhmj.v5i2.1105

Santosa, A. (2023). Pengaruh perubahan hukum terhadap implementasi hak-hak tersangka di Indonesia. Jakarta: Rajawali Pers.

Ulhaq, A. M. (2023). Kedudukan penyidik kepolisian terhadap kewenangannya menangani perkara tindak pidana korupsi penyalahgunaan wewenang menurut perspektif sistem peradilan pidana. AL-MANHAJ: Jurnal Hukum dan Pranata Sosial Islam, 5(2), 1205-1214. https://doi.org/10.37680/almanhaj.v5i2.2910

Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 11 Tahun 2008 tentang Informasi dan Transaksi Elektronik.

Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 11 Tahun 2012 tentang Sistem Peradilan Pidana Anak.

Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 19 Tahun 2016 tentang Perubahan atas Undang-Undang Nomor 11 Tahun 2008 tentang Informasi dan Transaksi Elektronik.

Wahyudi, S. (2011). Implementasi ide diversi dalam pembaruan sistem peradilan pidana anak di Indonesia. Yogyakarta: Genta Publishing.

Wulandari, S., & Lestari, L. (2022). Reformasi penegakan hukum dalam kepolisian: Tantangan dan solusi di Indonesia. Indonesian Journal of Intellectual Publication, 2(3), 150-157. https://doi.org/10.51577/ijipublication.v2i3.543

Yunita, F. (2023). Aspek hukum penggunaan media sosial berbasis internet. Yogyakarta: Deepublish.

Downloads

Published

2025-07-31

How to Cite

Syarif Hidayatulloh, & Sigit Kamseno. (2025). Peran Penyidik dalam Menjamin Hak Tersangka : Kajian terhadap Implementasi KUHAP dalam Tahap Penyidikan. Demokrasi: Jurnal Riset Ilmu Hukum, Sosial Dan Politik, 2(3), 305–316. https://doi.org/10.62383/demokrasi.v2i3.1218

Similar Articles

<< < 1 2 3 4 5 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.