Konsep BUMN Sebagai Objek Sengketa Administrasi Pemerintahan (Paradigma Baru Pasca UU No. 30 Tahun 2014 Tentang Administrasi Pemerintahan dan Telaah Kritis Terhadap RUU BUMN)

Authors

  • Muklis Al’anam Universitas Airlangga

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.62383/demokrasi.v2i2.837

Keywords:

Public Service, State Organiser, State-Owned Enterprise

Abstract

State-Owned Enterprises (BUMN) are companies owned by the state, where their capital comes from state assets that are separated for the purpose of generating state revenues. Unlike private companies, BUMN are not solely focused on profit-seeking but also have an essential role in fulfilling government duties, such as implementing policies for distributing subsidized goods to the public. This dual role means that BUMN are not only subject to the provisions of corporate law, as regulated in Law No. 40/2007 on Limited Liability Companies, but also bound by general administrative law. As a result, the concept of BUMN has evolved beyond merely a profit-driven state enterprise. It has become a public law entity responsible for formulating and implementing policies in the area of public services, which benefit the society at large.This legal research uses a combination of a statutory approach, conceptual approach, and case approach to explore the legal status of BUMN. The findings indicate that BUMN, in carrying out their activities, serve as public law entities, with nearly all of their business operations involving aspects of public services. Thus, BUMN should be understood as state administrative agencies or officials. Additionally, any financial losses incurred by BUMN are regarded as state financial losses under the relevant laws and regulations, emphasizing the interconnection between the state and BUMN in their implementation of public duties and services.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Ade Irawan Taufik. (2020). Keputusan Direksi Badan Usaha Milik Negara (BUMN) Sebagai Keputusan Tata Usaha Negara. Jurnal Rechtsvinding, 9(3), 337.

Agus Sekarmadji, & Sri Winarsih. (2005). Perlindungan Hukum Bagi Pemegang Surat Hijau di Kota Surabaya.

Al’anam, M. (2023). 99 Tanya Jawab Hukum. Ruang Karya.

Bagus Oktavian Abrianto, et al. (2020). Perkembangan Gugatan Perbuatan Melanggar Hukum oleh Pemerintah Pasca-Undang-Undang Nomor 30 Tahun 2014. Negara Hukum, 11(1), 50.

de Graaf, K. J., Marseille, A. T., & Tjeenk Willink, H. D. (2019). Transparency and Access to Government Information in the Netherlands. Palgrave MacMillan.

De Vries, C. W. (1939). Vragen Op Het Gebied Van Het Administratief Recht. H. D. Tjeenk Willink.

Djatmiati, T. S. (2004). Prinsip Izin Usaha Industri di Indonesia (Disertasi, Doktor, Fakultas Hukum Universitas Airlangga, Surabaya).

HR, R. (2011). Hukum Administrasi Negara. Rajawali.

I Gede Pantja Astawa, & Suprin Na’a. (2012). Memahami Ilmu Negara dan Teori Negara. Refika Aditama.

Ibrahim, R. (1997). Prospek BUMN dan Kepentingan Umum. Citra Aditya Bakti.

Indah Cahyani, & Tatiek Sri Djadmiati. (2019). Demarcation BUMN: Between Private Laws and Public Laws. Yuridika, 35(2), 311.

Indroharto. (2000). Usaha Memahami Undang-Undang tentang Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara Buku I. Pustaka Sinar Harapan.

Jimly Asshiddiqie. (2022). Perkembangan & Konsolidasi Lembaga Negara Pasca Reformasi. Sinar Grafika.

Lotulung, P. E. (2013). Lintas Sejarah dan Gerak Dinamika Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara (PERATUN). Salemba Humanika.

Muchsan. (1997). Pengantar Hukum Administrasi Negara Indonesia. Liberty.

Muklis Al’anam, & Lanny Ramli. (2024). The Expansion of the Absolute Competence of Administrative Courts: A Comparative Legal Study with the French Conseil d’État. Nagara Law Journal, 1(2), 36.

Muklis Al’anam. (2024a). Pemaknaan Badan Usaha Milik Negara (BUMN) Sebagai Penyelenggara Negara Dalam Sengketa Administrasi Berdasarkan Undang-Undang Nomor 30 Tahun 2014 Tentang Administrasi Pemerintahan [Fakultas Hukum Universitas Airlangga]. https://www.all.fh.unair.ac.id/index.php?p=show_detail&id=24022&keywords=

Muklis Al’anam. (2024b). Perbandingan Sistem Peradilan Administrasi Indonesia dan Jerman. Proceeding of Airlangga Faculty of Law Colloquium, 1, 400.

Philipus M. Hadjon. (1987). Perlindungan Hukum Bagi Rakyat di Indonesia. Bina Ilmu.

Prajudi Atmosudirjo. (1994). Hukum Administrasi Negara. Ghalia Indonesia.

Prasetio. (2014). Dilema BUMN Benturan Penerapan Business Judgment Rule (BJR) dalam Keputusan Direksi BUMN. Rayyana Komunikasindo.

Refly Harun. (2019). BUMN Dalam Sudut Pandang Tata Negara. Balai Pustaka.

Sjahran Basah. (1985). Eksistensi dan Tolak Ukur Badan Peradilan Administrasi di Indonesia. Alumni.

Sri Soemantri. (2014). Hukum Tata Negara Indonesia Pemikiran dan Pandangan. Remaja Rosdakarya.

Stephen G. Breyer. (2022). Administrative Law and Regulatory Policy. Aspen Publishing.

Tatiek Sri Djatmiati, et al. (2020). Hukum Administrasi Sebuah Bunga Rampai. Laksbang Pressindo.

Utrecht. (1986). Pengantar Hukum Administrasi Negara Indonesia. Surabaya Pustaka Tinta Mas.

Downloads

Published

2025-03-11

How to Cite

Muklis Al’anam. (2025). Konsep BUMN Sebagai Objek Sengketa Administrasi Pemerintahan (Paradigma Baru Pasca UU No. 30 Tahun 2014 Tentang Administrasi Pemerintahan dan Telaah Kritis Terhadap RUU BUMN). Demokrasi: Jurnal Riset Ilmu Hukum, Sosial Dan Politik, 2(2), 01–20. https://doi.org/10.62383/demokrasi.v2i2.837

Similar Articles

<< < 1 2 3 4 5 6 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.