Perlindungan Hukum terhadap Debitur yang Wanprestasi terhadap Penarikan Objek Kredit Tanpa Persetujuan Debitur
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.62383/terang.v2i2.1086Keywords:
Legal-Protection, Default, Fiduciary-Guarantee, Unilateral-ExecutionAbstract
The development of financing practices with fiduciary guarantees in Indonesia often raises legal issues, especially regarding the unilateral withdrawal of credit objects by creditors against defaulting debtors. This action is often carried out without the consent of the debtor or a court decision, thus potentially violating the principles of justice and the principle of due process of law. This research aims to analyze the form of legal protection for debtors in a fiduciary financing agreement. The type of research used is normative juridical with an approach to legislation and court decisions. The results showed that the act of unilateral withdrawal can be categorized as a civil and criminal tort. Therefore, regulatory reform, increased legal literacy, and a fair and humanist dispute resolution mechanism are needed. It is recommended that fiduciary execution be carried out in accordance with legal procedures to protect the debtor's constitutional rights and ensure fairness in contractual relationships.
Downloads
References
Agustina, R. (2021). Perlindungan hukum terhadap debitur dalam perjanjian fidusia. Laksbang Pressindo.
Hafizh, A., & Rahardjo, T. (2023). Restrukturisasi kredit dalam perjanjian pembiayaan fidusia: Pendekatan relasional dan perlindungan debitur. Jurnal Hukum & Ekonomi Syariah, 12(1), 45–63.
Hutagalung, A. (2020). Hukum jaminan di Indonesia: Konsep dan implementasi. Sinar Grafika.
Isra, S. (2011). Mahkamah Konstitusi dan pembaruan ketatanegaraan Indonesia. Jurnal Konstitusi, 8(4), 785–810. https://mkri.id/index.php?page=web.Jurnal&id=1
Komnas HAM. (2022). Laporan tahunan Komnas HAM 2022.
Lumbanraja, R., & Situmorang, Y. (2023). Asas perlindungan konsumen dan kontrak dalam perspektif hukum perdata Indonesia. Refika Aditama.
Lumbantobing, A. (2021). Perlindungan hukum terhadap debitur dalam eksekusi jaminan fidusia. Jurnal Hukum Ius Quia Iustum, 28(4), 735–750.
Mahkamah Konstitusi Republik Indonesia. (2019). Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 18/PUU-XVII/2019 tentang Pengujian UU Jaminan Fidusia. Putusan MK.
Marzuki, P. M. (2017). Pengantar ilmu hukum. Kencana.
Mertokusumo, S. (2004). Penemuan hukum: Sebuah pengantar. Liberty.
Otoritas Jasa Keuangan (OJK). (2021). Surat Edaran OJK Nomor 5/SEOJK.05/2021 tentang Penagihan oleh Perusahaan Pembiayaan.
Rahardjo, S. (2006). Ilmu hukum progresif. Genta Publishing.
Sefriani. (2020). Hak asasi manusia dalam hukum internasional. Rajawali Pers.
Setiadi, E. (2021). Hukum pidana ekonomi. Refika Aditama.
Subekti, R. (2009). Hukum perjanjian. Intermasa.
Wicaksono, B. (2022). Penarikan sepihak oleh debt collector dan implikasi hukumnya: Kajian terhadap Putusan MK Nomor 18/PUU-XVII/2019. Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 19(2), 129–148.
Yunus, M. (2023). Restorative justice dalam penyelesaian sengketa ekonomi di Indonesia. UII Press.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Terang : Jurnal Kajian Ilmu Sosial, Politik dan Hukum
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
