Penegakan Hukum Melalui Restorative Justice dalam Penyelesaian Tindak Pidana Penganiayaan di Wilayah Hukum Polres Bantul
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.62383/terang.v2i3.1228Keywords:
Assault, Criminal Case, Law Enforcement, Police, Restorative JusticeAbstract
This study examines law enforcement through a restorative justice approach in resolving criminal acts of assault within the jurisdiction of the Bantul Police. This approach offers an alternative way to resolve criminal cases, emphasizing restorative justice, aimed at restoring relationships between perpetrators, victims, and the community. The main objective of this study is to analyze how investigators implement restorative justice and to identify obstacles encountered in its implementation in the field. The methods used in this study are normative and empirical juridical. The normative juridical approach is conducted by examining laws and regulations governing restorative justice, while the empirical approach is conducted through a case study of the implementation of assault case resolution at the Bantul Police. Data were obtained from documentation, interviews with investigators, and related parties in the mediation process. The results of the study indicate that the resolution of criminal acts of assault through restorative justice is implemented in the form of mediation between the perpetrator and victim, facilitated by investigators. This process prioritizes deliberation and consensus to achieve peace and avoids formal legal proceedings. However, its implementation has not run smoothly. Some of the main obstacles identified include low public legal awareness, victims' unpreparedness for reconciliation, and limited police understanding and skills in implementing restorative justice principles. Therefore, strategic efforts are needed, such as strengthening regulations supporting restorative justice, training for law enforcement officers, and ongoing community outreach to ensure this approach can be optimally implemented in resolving assault cases.
Downloads
References
Adami, C. (2010). Kejahatan terhadap tubuh dan nyawa. Rajawali Pers.
Agung Ngurah Adhi, W., & Setiabudhi, I. K. R. (2022). Restorative justice dalam penyelesaian sengketa cyberbullying. Jurnal Magister Hukum Udayana, 11(2), 439–454.
Asshiddiqie, J. (2025, 20 Maret). Makalah penegakan hukum. http://www.google.com//penegakan-huku-jimlyasshiddiqie//
Asshiddiqie, J., & Ali, S. M. (2012). Teori Hans Kelsen tentang hukum. Konpres.
Bambang, S. (2003). Metode penelitian hukum (Cet. 5). Raja Grafindo Persada.
Barda Nawawi, A. (2010). Bunga rampai kebijakan hukum pidana. Prenada Media Group.
Djoko, P., & Agus, I. (1987). Hak asasi tersangka dan peranan psikologi dalam konteks KUHAP. Bina Aksara.
Efendi, J., & Ibrahim, J. (2016). Metode penelitian hukum normatif dan empiris. Kencana.
Fernando, M., Kadaryanto, B., & Winstar, Y. N. (2024). Implementasi syarat materiil restorative justice untuk pelaku…. The Juris, 8(1), 251–268. https://doi.org/10.56301/juris.v8i1.1261
Hari, S., & Lily, R. (2003). Hukum pembuktian dalam perkara pidana. Mandar Maju.
Johnson, A. S. (2014). Sosiologi hukum. Rineka Cipta.
Moeljatno. (2013). Azaz-azaz hukum pidana. Rineka Cipta.
Muhammad, R. (2021). Kajian yuridis terhadap pembagian tindak pidana dalam sistem hukum Indonesia. Jurnal Hukum Ius Quia Iustum, 26(3), 498–510.
Muladi. (2018). Menjamin kepastian ketertiban penegakan dan perlindungan hukum dalam era globalisasi. Jurnal Keadilan.
Peraturan Pemerintah Republik Indonesia Nomor 58 Tahun 2010 tentang Perubahan atas Peraturan Pemerintah Nomor 27 Tahun 1983 tentang Pelaksanaan Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Acara Pidana.
Poerwadarminta. (2003). Kamus umum bahasa Indonesia. Balai Pustaka.
R. Soesilo. (2011). Pembelajaran lengkap hukum pidana. Politera.
Rahardjo, S. (2014). Penegakan hukum sebagai tinjauan sosiologis. Genta Publishing.
Ramly, H. (2015). Persamaan di hadapan hukum (Equality before the law) di Indonesia. Ghalia Indonesia.
Saputra, A. (2012). Analisis yuridis kekuatan pembuktian bukti digital (digital evidence) dalam pembuktian perkara korupsi. Universitas Lampung (UNILA).
Sianturi, S. R. (2025). Unsur-unsur tindak pidana. Klinik Hukumonline. Diakses dari https://www.hukumonline.com pada 15 Juli 2025.
Soekanto, S. (2015). Faktor-faktor yang mempengaruhi penegakan hukum. Raja Grafindo Persada.
Sudarsono. (2010). Kamus hukum. Rineka Cipta.
Teguh, P., & Abdul, H. (2017). Ilmu hukum dan filsafat hukum. Pustaka Pelajar.
Undang-Undang Dasar Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 1945 (Amandemen Lengkap).
Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 1 Tahun 1946 tentang Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana.
Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 2 Tahun 2002 tentang Kepolisian Negara Republik Indonesia.
Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 8 Tahun 1981 tentang Hukum Acara Pidana (KUHAP).
Yulies Tina, M. (2014). Pengantar hukum Indonesia. Sinar Grafika.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Terang : Jurnal Kajian Ilmu Sosial, Politik dan Hukum
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
