Menilai Efektivitas Penegakan Hukum Persaingan Usaha terhadap Penyalahgunaan Posisi Dominan di Industri Penerbangan Indonesia (Lion Air Group)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.62383/terang.v2i4.1392Keywords:
Business Competition, Dominant Position, KPPU, Lion Air Group, Price MonopolyAbstract
This study discusses allegations of abuse of dominant position by Lion Air Group in the domestic aviation market and air cargo services in Indonesia. By controlling more than 50% of the market share, the group is suspected of unilaterally setting ticket prices and logistics costs, which could hinder healthy business competition and harm consumers and competing airlines. This study uses a normative juridical approach with a descriptive qualitative analysis method, supported by secondary data from legislation, KPPU reports, and academic literature related to competition law. The study's findings indicate that the concentrated market structure and weak regulatory oversight contribute to the formation of dominant behavior that harms the market and consumers. Legally, such actions violate Article 25 of Law Number 5 of 1999, as they result in discriminatory practices and unreasonable price control. Synergy between the KPPU and the Ministry of Transportation is needed to strengthen regulations in the aviation sector in order to create a business climate that is more fair, competitive, and oriented towards public welfare.
Downloads
References
A.C. Pigou. (1951). Welfare Economics Theory.
Andi Fahmi Lubis, dkk. (2017). Hukum persaingan usaha di Indonesia.
Arifin, Z. (2020). Advokasi persaingan usaha sebagai upaya preventif KPPU dalam menjaga persaingan sehat. Jurnal Rechtsvinding, 9(1), 75–90.
Badan Pembinaan Hukum Nasional. (2019). Naskah akademik revisi Undang-Undang Nomor 5 Tahun 1999 tentang Larangan Praktik Monopoli dan Persaingan Usaha Tidak Sehat. Kementerian Hukum dan HAM RI.
Fadjar, A., & Djamaluddin, S. M. (2017). Hukum persaingan usaha di Indonesia.
Harahap, M. Y. (2002). Pembahasan permasalahan dan penerapan KUHAP: Penyidikan dan penuntutan.
Kementerian Hukum dan HAM RI, Badan Pembinaan Hukum Nasional. (2019). Naskah akademik revisi UU No. 5 Tahun 1999.
Komisi Pengawas Persaingan Usaha. (2021). Laporan tahunan KPPU 2021. https://www.kppu.go.id
Komisi Pengawas Persaingan Usaha. (2023). Policy paper: Pengawasan persaingan di sektor transportasi dan logistik. https://www.kppu.go.id/id/publikasi/policy-paper/
OECD. (2018). Competition assessment reviews: Indonesia. OECD Publishing. https://www.oecd.org/daf/competition/
OECD. (2019). OECD competition assessment toolkit. OECD Publishing.
Posner, R. A. (1979). Antitrust law: An economic perspective.
Rachmawati, D. (2020). Penyalahgunaan posisi dominan oleh grup maskapai penerbangan di Indonesia: Analisis berdasarkan UU No. 5 Tahun 1999. Jurnal Hukum dan Pembangunan, 50(3).
Richardson, T., & Nordhaus, W. (2010). Praktik monopoli dalam teori klasik.
Setiawan, D. (2018). Tumpang tindih kewenangan antara KPPU dan Kementerian Perhubungan dalam penetapan tarif maskapai. Jurnal Hukum IUS QUIA IUSTUM, 25(2).
Simanjuntak, B. (2021). Peran KPPU dalam menjaga persaingan usaha sehat di sektor transportasi udara. Jurnal Hukum & Pembangunan, 51(2), 345–362.
Todaro, M., & Smith, S. (2015). Ketimpangan akses ekonomi.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Terang : Jurnal Kajian Ilmu Sosial, Politik dan Hukum
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
