Analisis terhadap Timbulnya Hak Servituut Ditinjau dari Proses Pemecahan Bidang Tanah yang Salah

Muhammad Husein Abdullah

doi:10.62383/aktivisme.v2i4.1266

Authors

Muhammad Husein Abdullah Universitas Islam Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.62383/aktivisme.v2i4.1266

Keywords:

Land Disputes, Land Division, Mediation, Servitude Rights, Social Function of Land

Abstract

This study provides an in-depth examination of the emergence of servitude rights (hak servituut) arising from procedural errors in land parcel division, which result in landlocked plots without road access. Servitude rights, as regulated in Article 674 of the Indonesian Civil Code and reinforced by the Conversion Provision of Article I point 6 of the Basic Agrarian Law (UUPA), constitute a legal burden imposed on one parcel of land for the benefit of another, thereby ensuring that landlocked owners gain reasonable access. Although the UUPA serves as the national agrarian framework, the servitude concept remains highly relevant and functions as a crucial legal instrument to safeguard the rights of affected landowners. This research employs a normative juridical approach, integrating statutory and conceptual analyses to explore the consistency between legal theory and practice. The findings demonstrate that parcel division conducted without considering the social function of land, as mandated by Article 6 of the UUPA, can trigger access disputes that adversely affect community interests. Dispute resolution may proceed through litigation or non-litigation channels, with mediation emerging as the more effective and efficient option for maintaining harmonious relations between parties. Article 667 of the Civil Code provides a clear legal basis for landlocked property owners to obtain access while obligating them to pay fair compensation to the burdened land. Based on these findings, the study recommends strict adherence to lawful land division procedures and the development of detailed technical guidelines on servitude compensation to prevent future disputes and to strengthen legal certainty for all stakeholders.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Ardianasari, B. D., & Tamsil. (2022). Tinjauan yuridis tentang perbuatan melawan hukum terhadap hak servituut akibat akses jalan yang ditutup: Studi Putusan Nomor 4/Pdt. G/2019/Pn. Tjp. Novum: Jurnal Hukum, 9(3), 128–137.

Chandra, S. (2005). Sertipikat kepemilikan hak atas tanah, persyaratan permohonan di Kantor Pertanahan. Jakarta: Gramedia Widia Sarana Indonesia.

Dakhriawan, S. (2014). Tinjauan yuridis pengabdian pekarangan sebagai fungsi sosial dalam rangka pendaftaran tanah (Studi di Kantor Pertanahan Kota Makassar) [Undergraduate thesis, Sekolah Tinggi Pertanahan Nasional]. Yogyakarta.

Effendi, B. (1993). Kumpulan tulisan tentang hukum tanah. Bandung: Alumni.

Firdaus, T. D. (2023). Efektivitas penerapan Pasal 667 Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Perdata tentang hak pekarangan (servituut) dalam kehidupan bertetangga di wilayah Kelurahan Sungai Putri Kota Jambi [Dissertation, Universitas Batanghari Jambi].

Fitra, E. (2014). Pelanggaran hak servituut (pengabdian pekarangan) warga Lengkong Gudang Serpong – Tangerang Selatan ditinjau dari Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Perdata [Undergraduate thesis, Universitas Trisakti]. Jakarta.

Ishaya, N. S., Budhiawan, H., & Widarbo, K. (2021). Implementasi hak servituut pada pelaksanaan pendaftaran tanah sistematis lengkap di Kabupaten Bekasi. Marcapada: Jurnal Kebijakan Pertanahan, 1(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.31292/jm.v1i1.6

Khaerunnisa, P. S. (2022). Jual beli HGB hasil pecahan yang telah berakhir masa berlakunya di Kabupaten Agam (Studi Putusan No. 26/Pdt. G/2019/PN LBB) = Selling and buying BRT (Building Rights Title) from the splitting result which has expired in Agam Regency (Study of Decision No. 26/Pdt. G/2019/PN LBB) [Dissertation, Universitas Hasanuddin].

Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Perdata. (n.d.).

Marzuki, P. M. (2011). Penelitian hukum. Jakarta: Kencana Prenada Media Group.

Nadziroh, M. (2023). Perlindungan hukum pembebanan hak tanggungan sertifikat induk kepada pemegang sertifikat pecah tanah (splitzing). Jurnal Education and Development, 11(1), 230–234. https://doi.org/10.37081/ed.v11i1.4363

Peraturan Menteri Negara Agraria/Kepala Badan Pertanahan Nasional Nomor 3 Tahun 1997 tentang Ketentuan Pelaksanaan Peraturan Pemerintah Nomor 24 Tahun 1997 tentang Pendaftaran Tanah. (1997).

Peraturan Pemerintah Nomor 24 Tahun 1997 tentang Pendaftaran Tanah. (1997).

Rahminingsih, S. E., & Wahyudi, E. (2024). Implementasi ganti rugi hak pengabdian pekarangan (servituut) sesuai dengan Pasal 667 KUHPerdata. Jurnal Ilmiah Wahana Pendidikan, 10(22), 1222–1230.

Sholihah, S. A. (2018). Penyelesaian sengketa akses jalan bidang tanah pekarangan (Studi di Kantor Pertanahan Kabupaten Sleman) [Undergraduate thesis, Sekolah Tinggi Pertanahan Nasional]. Yogyakarta. https://doi.org/10.31292/jta.v1i1.7

Simanjuntak, P. N. H. (2009). Pokok-pokok hukum perdata Indonesia. Jakarta: Djambatan.

Subekti. (2001). Pokok-pokok hukum perdata. Jakarta: Intermasa.

Undang-Undang Nomor 5 Tahun 1960 tentang Peraturan Dasar Pokok-Pokok Agraria. (1960).

Usman, R. (2011). Hukum kebendaan. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika.

Wirandhana, E. (2017). Tinjauan hukum hak servituut jika melintasi tanah milik orang lain. Jurnal Lex Administratum, 5(6), 33–40.

Yuniar, N. S., Munir, & Ilham. (2025). Penerapan hak servituut (pengabdian pekarangan) dalam konteks kepentingan sosial di Indonesia. Jurnal Tana Mana, 6(1), 292–301.