Analisis Actio Pauliana Sebagai Bentuk Perlindungan Hukum Bagi Kreditor Kepailitan

Studi Putusan Nomor 06/Pdt.Sus.Gugatan Lain-Lain AP/2020/PN.Niaga.Jkt.Pst. Jo. Nomor 27/Pdt-Sus PKPU/2015/PN.Niaga.Jkt.Pst.

Authors

  • Aji Suryanata Universitas Sebelas Maret
  • Yudho Taruno Muryanto Universitas Sebelas Maret

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.62383/aliansi.v1i2.59

Keywords:

Actio Pauliana, Bankruptcy Law, Legal Protection

Abstract

This research aims to determine whether actio pauliana is an appropriate legal remedy in providing legal protection for creditors in bankruptcy cases. It also aims to determine the basis of the judge's considerations in Verdict No. 06/Pdt.Sus.Gugatan Lain-lain-AP/2020/PN.Niaga.Jkt.Pst. Jo. No. 27/Pdt-Sus-PKPU/2015/PN.Niaga.Jkt.Pst. This research is a normative legal research with statutory and case approach. The type of data used is secondary data. The technique used in collecting legal materials in this research is literature study. This research uses syllogism analysis technique and deductive thinking pattern, using major premises and minor premises which then these premises can produce conclusions. Based on this research, it is found that actio pauliana is an appropriate legal remedy in providing legal protection for creditors who are harmed by debtors in bankruptcy cases because there is internal legal protection and external legal protection in accordance with Isnaeni's legal protection theory used as an analysis. The basis of the judge's consideration used as the curator's right to file an actio pauliana lawsuit is Article 47 paragraph (1) and Explanation of Article 3 paragraph (1) of the Bankruptcy Law, then in deciding the case used as the analysis material, the judge uses Article 41 and Article 42 of the Bankruptcy Law.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Amboro, F. P. Y. (2020). Hukum Kepailitan: Penerapan Hukum Kepailitan pada Korporasi di Indonesia, Amerika Serikat, Inggris, dan Australia. Malang: Setara Press.

Hadjon, Philipus M. (1987). Perlindungan Hukum Bagi Rakyat Indonesia. Surabaya: Bina Ilmu.

Nugroho, S. A. (2018). Hukum Kepailitan di Indonesia: Dalam Teori dan Praktik Serta Penerapan Hukumnya. Jakarta: Prenadamedia Group.

Sembiring, Sentosa. (2017). Hukum Dagang. Bandung: PT. Citra Aditya Bakti.

Soekanto, S., & Mamudji, S. (2022). Penelitian Hukum Normatif: Suatu Tinjauan Singkat. Depok: Rajawali Pers.

Wijaya, A., & Ananta, W. P. (2018). Hukum Acara Peradilan Niaga: Practical Guide to The Commercial Court. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika.

Moertiono, R. J. (2021). Perjanjian Kredit Pemilikan Rumah dalam Perspektif Teori Perlindungan Hukum. All Fields of Science J-LAS, 1(3), 252-262.

Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Perdata

Undang-Undang Nomor 37 Tahun 2004 tentang Kepailitan dan Penundaan Kewajiban Pembayaran Utang

Putusan Nomor 06/Pdt.Sus.Guagatan Lain-lain-AP/2020/PN.Niaga.Jkt.Pst. Jo. Nomor 27/Pdt-Sus-PKPU/2015/PN.Niaga.Jkt.Pst.

Downloads

Published

2024-02-20

How to Cite

Aji Suryanata, & Yudho Taruno Muryanto. (2024). Analisis Actio Pauliana Sebagai Bentuk Perlindungan Hukum Bagi Kreditor Kepailitan : Studi Putusan Nomor 06/Pdt.Sus.Gugatan Lain-Lain AP/2020/PN.Niaga.Jkt.Pst. Jo. Nomor 27/Pdt-Sus PKPU/2015/PN.Niaga.Jkt.Pst. Aliansi: Jurnal Hukum, Pendidikan Dan Sosial Humaniora, 1(2), 63–72. https://doi.org/10.62383/aliansi.v1i2.59

Similar Articles

<< < 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.