Perbandingan Lembaga Anti-Korupsi: Studi KPK Indonesia dan CPIB Singapura
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.62383/amandemen.v3i1.1464Keywords:
Corruption, CPIB, Eradication of Corruption, KPK, Legal ComparisonAbstract
. Corruption is an extraordinary crime that has a systemic impact on economic stability, governance and the protection of human rights. Indonesia and Singapore show significant differences in the effectiveness of corruption eradication, despite both applying the rule of law principle. Indonesia established the Corruption Eradication Commission (KPK) through Law Number 30 of 2002 jo. Law No. 19/2019 as an independent institution with powers to investigate and prosecute, but its effectiveness has been weakened by political interference, regulatory revisions, and bureaucratic obstacles. Singapore, on the other hand, relies on the Corrupt Practices Investigation (CPIB) under the Prevention of Corruption Act 1960, which has historical legitimacy, stable political support, and consistent regulations. This difference in effectiveness is reflected in the 2024 Corruption Perception Index, where Indonesia ranks 99th with a score of 37/100, while Singapore ranks 3rd with a score of 84/100. Although the KPK normatively has broader authority, 2024, where Indonesia ranked 99th with a score of 37/100, while Singapore ranked 3rd with a score of 84/100. Although the KPK normatively has broader authority, empirical results show that the success of corruption eradication is determined by institutional integrity, regulatory consistency, and structural independence. This research uses a normative juridical method with a literature study approach and deductive thinking method to analyze the legal basis, and implementation of the two institutions. The results of this study found that the differences between the anti-corruption institutions of the two countries do not merely depend on legal instruments, but on political structure, organizational culture, and institutional commitment in upholding integrity. It is expected to provide normative recommendations to strengthen Indonesia's anti-corruption institution, namely the KPK, through structural, regulative, and institutional reforms
Downloads
References
Adam Ramadhan, Sulaeman, A. K., Harahap, A. N. M., Asshidiqy, F., & Triadi, I. (2024). Perbandingan lembaga pemberantas tindak pidana korupsi: Tinjauan negara Indonesia dengan negara Singapura. SYARIAH: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 2(1), 68–77. https://doi.org/10.62017/syariah.v2i1.2308
Anggayudha, Z. H., & Alfasha, K. Z. (2023). Perbandingan pemberantasan tindak pidana korupsi di Indonesia dan Singapura. Varia Hukum, 5(1), 65–78. https://doi.org/10.15575/vh.v5i1.27158
Aprian, A., Afifi, G. R., Indraswari, P., & Rizqi, M. F. (2023). Analisis hukum Undang-Undang Nomor 19 Tahun 2019 tentang perubahan kedua atas Undang-Undang Nomor 30 Tahun 2002 tentang Komisi Pemberantasan Tindak Pidana Korupsi berdasarkan asas-asas pembentukan perundang-undangan di Indonesia. Jurnal IKAMAKUM.
Calvin, A. (2024). Extraordinary investigation power of the anti-corruption agencies in Indonesia and Singapore. Tumou Tou Law Review, 3(1), 15–22. https://doi.org/10.35801/tourev.v3i1.52166
Dewan Perwakilan Rakyat Republik Indonesia. (2019). Undang-Undang Nomor 19 Tahun 2019 tentang perubahan kedua atas Undang-Undang Nomor 30 Tahun 2002 tentang Komisi Pemberantasan Tindak Pidana Korupsi. Pemerintah Republik Indonesia.
Dewi, N. T. A. (2023). Peran KPK dalam pemberantasan korupsi di Indonesia. Mahkamah: Jurnal Riset Ilmu Hukum, 2(2). https://doi.org/10.62383/mahkamah.v2i2.543
Fauza Qadriah, Ramadi, B., & Aminudin. (2024). Efektivitas dan tantangan kebijakan hukum pidana korupsi: Perbandingan Indonesia, Singapura, Hong Kong, dan Malaysia. Juncto: Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum, 7(1). https://doi.org/10.31289/juncto.v7i1.6162
Kansil, C. S. T., & Sundaynatha, R. A. S. (2023). Efektivitas Komisi Pemberantasan Korupsi sebelum dan sesudah menjadi lembaga pemerintah. Jurnal Kewarganegaraan, 7(1). https://doi.org/10.31316/jk.v7i1.5066
Mochtar, Z. A. (2021). Independensi Komisi Pemberantasan Korupsi pasca Undang-Undang Nomor 19 Tahun 2019. Jurnal Konstitusi, 18(2), 321–344. https://doi.org/10.31078/jk1823
Muhammad Adi Jambia. (2025). Studi perbandingan pengaturan gratifikasi antara Indonesia dan Singapura. Journal of Anti-Corruption, 1(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.30872/action.v1i1.1574
Nugroho, C. J., Tan, W., & Situmeang, A. (2021). Pemberantasan tindak pidana korupsi Indonesia dan Singapura. Ius Civile: Refleksi Penegakan Hukum dan Keadilan.
Sekretariat Komisi Pemberantasan Korupsi. (n.d.). Tentang KPK – Undang-undang terkait. https://www.kpk.go.id/id/tentang-kpk/undang-undang-terkait
Sukarno, M., Rodriguez, M. J., & Nursamsiyah, N. (2023). E-government development on control corruption: A lesson learned from Singapore. Journal of Governance and Public Policy, 11(3). https://doi.org/10.18196/jgpp.v11i3.21447
Tangahu, A. A. (2025). Penegakan hukum terhadap tindak pidana korupsi sektor swasta: Studi perbandingan negara Indonesia dan Singapura. Al-Zayn: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial & Hukum, 3(2). https://doi.org/10.61104/alz.v3i2.1288
Wahib, W. (2023). Memaknai independensi KPK pasca perubahan kedua Undang-Undang RI Nomor 19 Tahun 2019. Rechtsregel: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 5(1). https://doi.org/10.32493/rjih.v5i1.23776
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Amandemen: Jurnal Ilmu pertahanan, Politik dan Hukum Indonesia
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
