Analisis Peran Pengadilan Pajak dalam Optimalisasi Pendapatan Negara

Authors

  • Irwan Triadi Universitas Pembangunan Nasional Veteran Jakarta
  • Evi Fitriani Universitas Pembangunan Nasional Veteran Jakarta

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.62383/amandemen.v2i2.857

Keywords:

Tax Court, Judge Independence, Tax Disputes, Legal Certainty, Tax Reform.

Abstract

The Tax Court has a crucial role in resolving tax disputes and optimizing state revenues. This study aims to analyze the effectiveness of the Tax Court in providing legal certainty for taxpayers and identifying obstacles that hinder its role in the Indonesian taxation system. The method used is a normative legal approach with an analysis of laws and regulations, court decisions, and related empirical data. The results of the study indicate that the dualism of guidance between the Supreme Court and the Ministry of Finance creates the potential for a conflict of interest that can affect the independence of judges in deciding tax disputes. In addition, limited access to the Tax Court, which is only located in Jakarta, causes obstacles for taxpayers in the regions to obtain justice quickly and efficiently. The policy of administrative sanctions in the form of a 100% fine for taxpayers whose appeals are rejected is also considered disproportionate and contrary to the principle of tax justice. To improve the effectiveness of the Tax Court, institutional reform is needed by unifying guidance under the Supreme Court, establishing Tax Court branches in various regions, and revising regulations related to tax sanctions in order to improve taxpayer compliance and trust in the national taxation system.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Amiruddian, & Asikin, H. Z. (2004). Pengantar metode hukum. PT. Raja Grafindo Persada.

Bachasan, M. (1979). Pokok-pokok administrasi negara. Alumni.

Badan Peradilan Pajak. (n.d.). BPSP diganti Badan Peradilan Pajak. http://www.kompas.com/kompas-cetak/0102/06/ekonomi/bpsp14.htm

Basri, H., & Muhibbin, M. (2022). Kedudukan pengadilan pajak dalam sistem peradilan di Indonesia. Jurnal Hukum dan Kenotariatan, 6(3), 1451.

Brotohardjo, S. (1995). Pengantar hukum pajak. Salemba Empat.

Direktorat Jenderal KPI. (n.d.). http://ditjenkpi.depdag.go.id/Bulletin2046.pdf (Diakses pada 28 Februari 2025)

Harahap, M. Y. (1997). Beberapa tinjauan mengenai sistem peradilan dan penyelesaian sengketa. PT. Citra Aditya Bakti.

Istiani, N. (n.d.). Menelaah keberadaan pengadilan pajak. MaPPI – FHUI.

Kania Sugiharti, D. (2011). Eksistensi pengadilan pajak dalam sistem peradilan di Indonesia. Makalah disampaikan dalam Diskusi Kedudukan Peradilan Pajak dalam Sistem Peradilan di Indonesia, BALITBANGDIKLAT Mahkamah Agung Republik Indonesia, Surabaya.

Kompas. (2010, 17 April). Triliunan rupiah hasil pajak berpotensi hilang. http://lipsus.kompas.com/grammyawards/read/2010/04/17/0311101/Triliunan.Rupiah.Hasil.Pajak.Berpotensi.Hilang (Diakses pada 10 Februari 2025)

Kristendo, S. (2019). Kedudukan pengadilan pajak dalam sistem peradilan di Indonesia. Jurnal Lex Administratum, 7(4), No. 5.

Mahfud MD, M. (2014). Aspek hukum negara dan administrasi negara kelembagaan pengadilan pajak. Jurnal Hukum dan Peradilan, 3(3), 351–360.

Mardiasmo. (2003). Perpajakan. Penerbit Andi.

Pudyatmoko, Y. S. (2009). Pengadilan dan penyelesaian sengketa di bidang pajak. PT. Gramedia Pustaka Utama.

Rochim. (2010). Modus operandi tindak pidana pajak. Solusi Publishing.

Shulton Asnawi, H., & Mukhlishin, A. (2017). Sanksi perpajakan dan pengadilan pajak di Indonesia: Upaya optimalkan perolehan pajak kaitannya dengan pembangunan nasional. Jurnal Hukum dan Ekonomi Syariah, 5(2), 356.

Soemitro, R. (1979). Dasar-dasar hukum pajak dan pajak pendapatan 1994. Eresco.

Suandy, E. (2000). Hukum pajak. Salemba Empat.

Sutrisno, D. (2016). Hakikat sengketa pajak, karakteristik pengadilan pajak, fungsi pengadilan pajak. Kencana.

Tahir, M. R., Rahman, U., & Nursalam, N. (2015). Pengaruh kecemasan dan kesulitan belajar matematika terhadap hasil belajar matematika pada siswa kelas X MA Negeri 1 Watampone Kabupaten Bone. MaPan: Jurnal Matematika dan Pembelajaran, 3(1), 86–102.

Tjip Ismail. (2010). Peradilan pajak dan kepastian hukum di tengah globalisasi ekonomi. Jurnal Hukum, 2(17), 285.

Winahyu, E. (2022). Implementasi penyelesaian sengketa pajak pada pengadilan pajak Indonesia. Justicia Sains: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 6(2), 256–257.

Downloads

Published

2025-04-17

How to Cite

Irwan Triadi, & Evi Fitriani. (2025). Analisis Peran Pengadilan Pajak dalam Optimalisasi Pendapatan Negara. Amandemen: Jurnal Ilmu Pertahanan, Politik Dan Hukum Indonesia, 2(2), 25–41. https://doi.org/10.62383/amandemen.v2i2.857

Most read articles by the same author(s)