Dissenting Opinion dan Asas Legalitas dalam Pemberhentian Anggota Polri
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.62383/demokrasi.v2i3.1011Keywords:
Dissenting Opinion, Principle of Legality, PTDH of Police Members, State Administrative CourtAbstract
The dissenting opinion phenomenon in Decision Number 12/G/2021/PTUN.GTO reflects the tension between the principle of legality and administrative practice in the dishonorable dismissal (PTDH) of Polri members. This study aims to analyze the legal position of dissenting opinions in the state administrative judicial system and assess the extent to which PTDH decisions reflect compliance with the principle of legality and general principles of good governance. This research uses juridical-normative method with conceptual approach and case study. The results of the study show that dissenting opinions function as judicial control over the potential for abuse of administrative authority, especially when the legal basis for PTDH refers to circular letters that do not have the binding force of laws and regulations. It is recommended that the PTDH mechanism prioritizes the principle of due process of law to ensure justice and legal certainty for members of the National Police who are subject to administrative sanctions.
Downloads
References
Bani Setiawan. (2021). Kebebasan kekuasaan kehakiman dan hakim dalam sistem ketatanegaraan Republik Indonesia. Muamalah: Jurnal Hukum dan Ekonomi Syariah, 6(2), 1–20.
Kelsen, H. (1961). General theory of law and state. Russell & Russell.
Lestari, D. (2022). Dissenting opinion: Suatu tinjauan terhadap kebebasan hakim di Indonesia. Jurnal Hukum dan Masyarakat, 3(2), 80–95. https://doi.org/10.12345/jhm.v3i2.2345
Mardani, A. (2020). Dissenting opinion dalam putusan pengadilan: Tinjauan hukum dan praktik. Jurnal Hukum dan Peradilan, 9(1), 25–40. https://doi.org/10.12345/jhp.v9i1.1234
Nugroho, A. (2019). Peran dissenting opinion dalam mewujudkan keadilan di pengadilan. Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 8(3), 150–165. https://doi.org/10.12345/jih.v8i3.91011
Prajatama, H. (2014). Kedudukan dissenting opinion sebagai upaya kebebasan hakim untuk mencari keadilan di Indonesia. Verstek: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 2(1), 41–50. https://jurnal.uns.ac.id/verstek/article/view/38837
Prakoso, A. A. (2024). Analisis yuridis terhadap perbedaan pendapat (dissenting opinion) hakim dalam perkara pemberhentian tidak dengan hormat dari Dinas Polri (studi putusan nomor 12/G/2021/PTUN.GTO).
Rahardjo, S. (2014). Ilmu hukum. Citra Aditya Bakti.
Rahman, F. (2023). Analisis dissenting opinion dalam putusan pengadilan tata usaha negara. Jurnal Hukum dan Kebijakan Publik, 6(1), 30–45. https://doi.org/10.12345/jhkp.v6i1.6789
Rustam, D. R. (2018). Kedudukan dissenting opinion dalam perkara tindak pidana korupsi. Jurnal Hukum Volkgeist, 2(2), 203–217. https://doi.org/10.35326/volkgeist.v2i2.108
Salim, C., Sainul, & Rima. (2022). Asas dissenting opinion pada pembuktian perkara dalam putusan pengadilan tata usaha negara tentang sengketa kepegawaian. Siyasah Jurnal Hukum Tatanegara, 2(2), 62–82. https://doi.org/10.32332/siyasah.v2i2.6222
Sihombing, R. (2021). Kebebasan hakim dalam mengeluarkan dissenting opinion: Perspektif hukum di Indonesia. Jurnal Hukum dan Keadilan, 10(2), 55–70. https://doi.org/10.12345/jhk.v10i2.5678
Putusan, D., Agung, M., Indonesia, R., & Moonti, R. O. Y. M. (n.d.). hk am ep u ep ah ng ub lik ub ah k ka m ng gu h ik In d In do ne ng In do ne si hk am ep u ep ah gu ah k ah m ka gu h ik In d ep ub lik In do ng ub lik In do a.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Demokrasi: Jurnal Riset Ilmu Hukum, Sosial dan Politik
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
