Analisis Yuridis Putusan Kasasi Dibawah Ancaman Minimal dalam UU Narkotika
Studi Kasus Putusan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 4634 K/Pid.Sus/2023
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.62383/demokrasi.v1i3.266Keywords:
Juridical Analysis, Minimal Threat, Narcotics, Cassation DecisionAbstract
At the cassation level, the defendant's Narcotics crime, named Andhyka Murty Cahya Primandaka, has been determined in Law Number 35 of 2009 concerning Narcotics. In this case the defendant has undergone several levels of justice and finally the cassation level. The judge has given criminal sanctions less than the minimum limit regulated in the Narcotics Law. So this creates legal confusion that can be disputed because the judge does not examine and try a criminal case properly. This research aims to analyze juridically the cassation decisions issued under the minimum threat in the Narcotics Law. A case study was conducted on Supreme Court Decision Number 4634 K/Pid.Sus/2023. The research method used is a normative legal research method with a case study approach, namely examining statutory regulations and judges' decisions with the aim of finding out the reasons why judges impose criminal sanctions less than the minimum limit. The results of the research show that in the cassation decision there are problems related to the application of minimum threats in narcotics cases and the need for a review of the application of minimum threats in narcotics cases to ensure justice and legal effectiveness.References
Frans, M. P. (2022). Implementasi pidana dibawah minimal dalam kasus narkotika berdasar perspektif hukum progresif. Supremasi Jurnal Hukum, 4(2), 174–189.
Komisi Yudisial Republik Indonesia. (2010). Menemukan substansi dalam keadilan prosedural. Komisi Yudisial Republik Indonesia.
Komisi Yudisial Republik Indonesia. (2010). Potret profesionalisme hakim dalam putusan. Komisi Yudisial Republik Indonesia.
Komisi Yudisial Republik Indonesia. (2011). Penerapan dan penemuan hukum dalam putusan hakim. Komisi Yudisial Republik Indonesia.
Kurniawan, P. D., & Sebyar, M. H. (2023). Kebijakan tindak pidana pada kejahatan narkotika di Indonesia. Journal of Law and Nation (JOLN), 2(4), 340–350.
Mahfud, Y., Saputra, D. E., & Munajah. Analisis yuridis terhadap ancaman minimal dalam ketentuan Pasal 112 (1) Undang-Undang No. 35 Tahun 2009 tentang Narkotika (Studi kasus putusan dalam perkara No.292/Pid.Sus/2016/PN.Mtp). 1–10.
Nasrullah, N. (2020). Putusan hakim terhadap pemberian sanksi di bawah batas minimal pada tindak pidana narkotika. SIGn Jurnal Hukum, 2(1), 1–19.
Partodiharjo, S. (2009). Kenali narkoba dan musuhi penyalahgunaannya. PT Gelora Aksara Pratama.
Pitaloka, E. (2020). Dasar pertimbangan hakim menjatuhkan pidana dibawah minimal khusus tindak pidana narkotika (Studi kasus perkara nomor: 121/Pid.Sus/2018/Pn.Mgg). 1–147.
Putusan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 4634 K/Pid.Sus/2023. https://putusan3.mahkamahagung.go.id/direktori/download_file/416d7c3a1bbc8f65474d2aa22857e045/pdf/zaee88eec5628cca95b3313132323339
Ronaldy, E., Ali, D., & Mujibussalim. (2019). Implikasi putusan hakim dalam penetapan sanksi di bawah minimum terhadap tindak pidana narkotika. Syiah Kuala Law Journal, 3(1), 129–146.
Sekretaris Jenderal Komisi Yudisial Republik Indonesia. (2014). Disparitas putusan hakim “Identifikasi dan implikasi”. Sekretaris Jenderal Komisi Yudisial Republik Indonesia.
Sekretaris Jenderal Komisi Yudisial Republik Indonesia. (2014). Kualitas hakim dalam putusan. Sekretaris Jenderal Komisi Yudisial Republik Indonesia.
Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 35 Tahun 2009 tentang Narkotika. https://peraturan.bpk.go.id/Download/28105/UU%20Nomor%2035%20Tahun%202009.pdf
Utami, Y., & Sebyar, M. H. (2023). Analisis pemidanaan terhadap anak sebagai pengedar narkotika dalam perspektif psikologi kriminal. Journal of Law and Nation (JOLN), 2(4), 381–397.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Demokrasi: Jurnal Riset Ilmu Hukum, Sosial dan Politik
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
