Implementasi Pelaksanaan Perlindungan Varietas Tanaman di Australia
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.62383/demokrasi.v2i3.1200Keywords:
Implementation, Plant Varieties, ProtectionAbstract
This study aims to determine the implementation of plant variety protection in Australia. This article will discuss how Australia implements the TRIPs Agreement to provide protection for all technologies, products, pharmaceuticals, plants, and microorganisms that can be patented through Plant Breeder's Rights (PBR). There are three types of intellectual property obtained in the context of plant varieties, namely patent rights, trademark rights, and plant breeding rights. The purpose of protection through PBR is to encourage innovation in plant breeding by granting limited exclusive rights to control its exploitation and prevent unauthorized parties from illegally exploiting the rights of breeders. The research method used in this study is normative law research, employing a statutory approach and an analytical approach.
Downloads
References
Administrator. (n.d.). What are plant breeder’s rights? IP Australia. https://www.ipaustralia.gov.au/plant-breeders-rights/what-are-plant-breeders-rights
Adrian Sutedi. (2013). Hak atas kekayaan intelektual. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika.
Advisory Council on Intellectual Property. (2004). Should plant and animal subject matter be excluded from protection by the innovation patent?
Devereaux, C., & Watkins, M. D. (2006). Case studies in US trade negotiation: Making the rules. Peterson Institute for International Economics.
Dodds, A. (n.d.). The impact of intellectual property rights on agricultural innovation. Journal of Agricultural Economics.
Dunleavy, K. J., & Briggs, E. V. (2000). Tribunals uphold patent protection for plant‐based biotechnology inventions in the United States and Europe. The Journal of World Intellectual Property, 3(4).
Gazalba, S., & Krisnawati, A. (2004). Perlindungan hukum varietas baru tanaman dalam perspektif hak paten dan hak pemulia. Jakarta: Rajagrafindo Persada.
Hulse, N. (2002). Plant breeders rights: Overview with an Australian native plant perspective.
Jefferson, D. (n.d.). The case of the pirated blueberries: Courts flex new muscle to protect plant breeders’ intellectual property. The University of Queensland. https://theconversation.com/the-case-of-the-pirated-blueberries-courts-flex-new-muscle-to-protect-plant-breeders-intellectual-property-126763
Nuraini, N. (2007). Perlindungan hak milik intelektual varietas tanaman (Guna peningkatan daya saing agribisnis). Bandung: Alfabeta.
Pratiwi, A. Y., Handayani, A. D., & Nuraini, L. A. (2021). Harmonisasi hukum ketentuan lisensi wajib (compulsory license) perlindungan varietas tanaman di Indonesia. Jurnal Poros Hukum Padjadjaran, 2(2), 284–301. https://doi.org/10.23920/jphp.v2i2.385
Purnamasari, L. A. (2020). Perlindungan hukum terhadap hasil pemuliaan tanaman dalam sistem hukum kekayaan intelektual di Indonesia. Jurnal Hukum & Pembangunan, 50(2), 301–320. https://doi.org/10.21143/jhp.vol50.no2.2587
Sanib, S. S. (2019). Ketentuan-ketentuan TRIPS-Plus dalam kerangka perjanjian perdagangan bebas. Halu Oleo Law Review, 3(1).
Tappeser, B., & Baier, A. (2012). Who owns biological diversity? Num, 2.
Wartini, S. (2005). Implikasi TRIPS terhadap konvensi keanekaragaman hayati. Jurnal Hukum, 12(30).
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Demokrasi: Jurnal Riset Ilmu Hukum, Sosial dan Politik
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
