Pengembalian Kerugian Keuangan Negara Berupa Pembayaran Uang Pengganti Oleh Terpidana Korupsi

Authors

  • Rusdi Sanmas STIH Painan

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.62383/demokrasi.v1i2.517

Keywords:

State Losses, Corruption, Asset Confiscation Law

Abstract

This study aims to determine the criminal law policy in the return of state financial losses in the form of replacement payments by corruption convicts and to determine the efforts made by police investigators in overcoming obstacles to the return of state financial losses in the form of replacement payments by corruption convicts. The method used in this study is a qualitative method, with a normative legal approach as the main approach and empirical legal as a supporting approach. The data sources in this study were obtained from secondary data as the main data and primary data as supporting data. Furthermore, the data were then processed using qualitative methods. The results of the study obtained information that the criminal payment of replacement money has been regulated in Law No. 31 of 1999 concerning the Eradication of Corruption as amended by Law No. 20 of 2001. The amount of replacement money payment is the same as the assets obtained from the crime of corruption. If the replacement money is not paid, the convict is sentenced to imprisonment for a period not exceeding the maximum threat of the principal sentence. Therefore, the return of state financial losses cannot be optimal. The amount of compensation for state financial losses needs to be increased, by confiscating and seizing the perpetrator's assets/wealth. The Asset Confiscation Law needs to be formed as a legal basis for confiscating assets from corruption.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Alie Yafie, Ahkad Sukaraja, Muhammad Amin Suma, dkk

Andi Hamzah, Hukum Acara Pidana Indonesia, Jakarta, Sinar Grafika, 1996Andi Hamzah, KUHP dan KUHAP (Rineka Cipta: Jakarta, 1996)

Andi Hamzah, Sistem Pidana dan Pemidanaan Indonesia, PT. Pradnya Paramita, 1997

AS Hornby, Oxford Advance Learner’s Dictionary of Current English, 1984

Bambang Sutiyoso & Sri Hastuti Puspitasari. (2005). Aspek-Aspek Perkembangan Kekuasaan Kehakiman di Indonesia. Yogyakarta: UII Press

Barda Nawawi Arief, Kapita Selekta Hukum Pidana, 2003

Bunga rampai 9 (Jakarta: Pustaka sinar Harapan, 19870)

Departemen Pendidikan Nasional, Kamus Besar Bahasa Indonesia, PN. Balai Pustaka, Jakarta, 2003

Djoko Prakoso dan Agus Imunarso, 1987. Hak Asasi Tersangka dan Peranan Psikologi dalam Konteks KUHAP. Bina Aksara, Jakarta

Djoko Prakoso. Asas-asas Hukum Pidana di Indonesia. Edisi Pertama, (Yogyakarta: Liberty Yogyakarta, 1987)

Garner, Bryan A., (Ed.) Black’s Law Dictionary (Second Pocket Edition), 2003 Ismawan, Indra, 2001. Memahami Reformasi Perpajakan 2000, Penerbit PT.Elex. Media Komputindo, Jakarta

La Ode Husen. (2009). Negara Hukum, Demokrasi dan Pemisahan Kekuasaan. Makassar: PT. Umitoha Ukhuwah Grafika

Lamintang, 1984. Dasar-dasar Hukum Pidana Indonesia. Sinar Baru. Bandung

Lamintang, P.A.F, 1997, Dasar-Dasar Hukum Pidana Indonesia. Bandung: Citra Aditya Bakti

M. Natsir Asnawi, Hermeneutika Putusan Hakim, (Yogyakarta: UUI Press, 2014)

Majalah Hukum Tahun ke XXII No 254 Januari 2007, Ikatan Hakim Indonesia IKAHI, Jakarta, 2006

Moeljatno, 1987. Asas-asas Hukum Pidana. Bina Aksara, Jakarta

Muladi dan Barda Nawawi Arief, 2005. Teori - teori dan Kebijakan Hukum Pidana. Alumni, Bandung

Muladi, 1990, Proyeksi Hukum Pidana Materiil Indonesia di Masa Datang, Semarang: Universitas Diponegoro

Mulyadi, Lilik, 2007, Putusan Hakim dalam Hukum Acara Pidana, Bandung: PT. Citra Adtya Bakti

Mulyatno, Pembuktian Terbalik dalam Tindak Pidana Pencucian Uang, Varia Peradilan

Nanda Agung Dewantoro, Masalah Kebebasan Hakim dalam Menangani Suatu Perkara Pidana (Aksara Persada: Jakarta, Indonesia, 1987)

Peter Gillies (Penyunting: Barda Nawawi Arief), Criminal Law, 1990

Prodjohamidjojo, Martiman, Memahami dasar-dasar hukum Pidana Indoesia (Jakarta: PT. Pradnya Paramita, 1997)

Retnowulan dan Iskandar Oeripkartawinata, Hukum Acara Perdata dalam Teori dan Praktek (Bandung : Mandar Maju, 2009)

Roeslan Salehlm. “Perbuatan Pidana dan Pertanggungjawaban Pidana” dua pengertian dalam Hukum Pidana” ( Jakarta: Aksara Baru,1983)

Romli Atmasasmita, 1995. Kapita Selekta Hukum Pidana dan Kriminologi. Mandar Maju, Bandung

Roscoe Pound. “introduction to the phlisophy of law” dalam Romli Atmasasmita, Perbandingan Hukum Pidana. Cet.II, ( Bandung:Mandar Maju,2000)

S.R Sianturi. Asas-asas Hukum Pidana Indonesia dan Penerapanya, Cet IV, ( Jakarta :Alumni Ahaem-Peteheam,1996)

Sholehuddin, 2002. Sistem Sanksi dalam Hukum Pidana, Ide Dasar Double Track System dan Implementasinya. Raja Grafindo Persada, Jakarta

Sudarto, 1990/1991. Hukum Pidana 1 A - 1B. Fakultas Hukum Universitas Jenderal Soedirman, Purwokerto Sutrisna, I Gusti Bagus, “Peranan Keterangan Ahli dalam Perkara Pidana ( Tijauan terhadap Pasal 44 KUHP),” dalam Andi Hamzah (ed.), Bunga Rampai Hukum Pidana dan Acara Pidana ( Jakarta :Ghalia Indonesia ,1986) Steven Box, Power Crime and Mystification, 1983

Sudikno Mertokusumo, Hukum Acara Perdata Indonesia, (Yogyakarta: Liberty, 2002)

Undang-Undang Dasar Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 1945

Undang-Undang Nomor 25 Tahun 2003 tentang Perubahan atas Undang-Undang Nomor 15 Tahun 2002 tentang Tindak Pidana Pencucian Uang

Undang-Undang Nomor 31 Tahun 1999 sebagaimana telah diubah dan ditambah dalam Undang-Undang Nomor 20 Tahun 2001 tentang Pemberantasan Tindak Pidana Korupsi

Published

2024-04-30

How to Cite

Rusdi Sanmas. (2024). Pengembalian Kerugian Keuangan Negara Berupa Pembayaran Uang Pengganti Oleh Terpidana Korupsi. Demokrasi: Jurnal Riset Ilmu Hukum, Sosial Dan Politik, 1(2), 254–267. https://doi.org/10.62383/demokrasi.v1i2.517