Keamanan Non-Tradisional dan Regulasi Pekerja Seks: Studi Perbandingan Kebijakan Indonesia dan Thailand dalam Perspektif Human Security

Valen Intanulsitta; Agussalim Burhanuddin

doi:10.62383/terang.v2i2.1104

Authors

Valen Intanulsitta Universitas Hasanuddin
Agussalim Burhanuddin Universitas Hasanuddin

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.62383/terang.v2i2.1104

Keywords:

Decriminalization, Human Security, Indonesia, Sex Work Policy, Thailand

Abstract

This study compares sex work regulations in Indonesia and Thailand through the lens of human security. Using qualitative comparative literature approach, the research analyzes four core dimensions including health, economy, legal protection, and social inclusion. Findings show that Indonesia still relies on criminalization, which exacerbates vulnerability, restricts access to health services, and reinforces stigma. Conversely, Thailand is undergoing a regulatory transition marked by community engagement, harm reduction practices, and early steps toward decriminalization. However, Thailand’s policy remains incomplete in addressing the rights of migrant and transgender sex workers. The study concludes that while Thailand provides a more inclusive model, both countries require further policy reform distinguishing voluntary sex work from exploitation, strengthening grassroots organizations, and regional policy harmonization under ASEAN human rights framework.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Aslam, A. F., Hulieta, E. I., & Katon, A. B. (n.d.). Gender construction in Southeast Asia through a social constructivism perspective: Case study on the Philippines, Indonesia, and Myanmar.

Assyifa, L. S., Sitaputri, K. M., Indradjaja, N., & Chamdani, C. (2024). Criminal regulatory reform to eradicate prostitution practices. Equalegum: International Law Journal, 2(3), 91–107.

Cameron, L., Seager, J., & Shah, M. (2021). Crimes against morality: Unintended consequences of criminalizing sex work. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 136(1), 427–469.

Davies, M. (2013). ASEAN and human rights norms: Constructivism, rational choice, and the action-identity gap. International Relations of the Asia-Pacific, 13(2), 207–231.

Dolhan, N., & Idris, N. A. (2021). Human trafficking and human security in Southeast Asia: A case study of Bangladeshi foreign workers in Malaysia. Journal of Nusantara Studies, 6(1), 136–155.

Hamdani, S., Suryandari, W. D., & Tohari, M. (2024). Criminalization of sex workers from the perspective of criminal law transformation in Indonesia. Ranah Research: Journal of Multidisciplinary Research and Development, 7(1), 54–62.

Harris, J., & Thaiprayoon, S. (2022). Common factors in HIV/AIDS prevention success: Lessons from Thailand. BMC Health Services Research, 22(1), 1487. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-022-08788-w

Hung, J. (2023a). Indonesia’s anti-extramarital sex legislation: Why and how should policymakers respond to prostitution. Journal of Poverty and Social Justice, 31(3), 417–422.

Hung, J. (2023b). Why legalizing prostitution in Thailand can help Bangkok regulate commercial sex and curb sex-trafficking systematically and institutionally. Frontiers in Sociology, 8, Article 1227247. https://doi.org/10.3389/fsoc.2023.1227247

Janyam, S., Phuengsamran, D., Pangnongyang, J., Saripra, W., Jitwattanapataya, L., Songsamphan, C., ... & Gopinath, D. (2020). Protecting sex workers in Thailand during the COVID-19 pandemic: Opportunities to build back better. WHO South-East Asia Journal of Public Health, 9(2), 100–103.

Kunke, J. P., Visokay, A., & McCormick, T. H. (2023). Respondent-driven sampling: An overview in the context of human trafficking. CHANCE, 36(4), 15–21.

Lin, L. S. (2021). Human security and gender: A comparative case study of human trafficking in Southeast Asia. RAIS Journal for Social Sciences, 5(2), 1–9.

Manik, P. R. I., Tama, B. W., Karima, H. L., Raya, R. A., Herlambang, Y. P., & Utami, R. (2024). Assessing the fulfillment of transwomen sex workers’ social, cultural, and economic rights in Yogyakarta: A capabilities approach-based study. Jurnal Filsafat, 34(2), 335–355.

McCarthy, B., Benoit, C., & Jansson, M. (2014). Sex work: A comparative study. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 43, 1379–1390.

Natalis, A., Purwanti, A., & Asmara, T. (2023). Determining appropriate policies for prostitution reform in Indonesia: Evaluating harm reduction versus harm elimination strategies. JSEAHR, 7, 176.

Putri, A. S., Radandima, G. U. E., & Setiawan, A. (2024). Analysis of the constructivist approach in the learning process of public policy. Analisis Pendekatan Konstruktivisme dalam Proses Pembelajaran Kebijakan Publik.

Roziq, N. F. (2020). Reconstruction of prostitution law in perspective of religious norms and renewal of criminal law. ACLJ, 1(2).

Sanders, T., Balderston, S., Wakefield, C., Scoular, J., Brents, B. G., & Abel, G. (2025). The sex work and sexual violence study: Research methods. In Voicing Consent: Sex Workers, Sexual Violation and Legal Consciousness in Cross-National Contexts (pp. 211–235). Cham: Springer Nature Switzerland.

Sihotang, N., & Wiriya, C. (2021). Human trafficking in Thailand in perspective of human rights law. Journal of Law and Legal Reform, 2(4), 505–514.

Villar, L. B. (2019). Unacceptable forms of work in the Thai sex and entertainment industry. Anti-Trafficking Review, 108–126.

West, B. S., Hilton, L., Montgomery, A. M., & Ebben, A. R. (2021). Reimagining sex work venues: Occupational health, safety, and rights in indoor workplaces. In Sex work, health, and human rights: Global inequities, challenges, and opportunities for action (pp. 207–230).

Wirawan, G. B. S., Wardhani, B. D. K., Pradnyani, P. E., Nurhalina, A., Sulaiman, N., Sukmaningrum, E., ... & Januraga, P. P. (2022). Behavioral changes, adaptation, and supports among Indonesian female sex workers facing dual risk of COVID-19 and HIV in a pandemic. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(3), 1361.