Perdagangan Pakaian Bekas Dalam Perspektif Perundang-Undangan Di Indonesia: Berkah Atau Musibah

Moammar Khadafi; Otih Handayani; Widya Romasindah Aidy

doi:10.62383/terang.v1i1.136

Authors

Moammar Khadafi Universitas Bhayangkara Jakarta Raya
Otih Handayani Universitas Bhayangkara Jakarta Raya
Widya Romasindah Aidy Universitas Bhayangkara Jakarta Raya

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.62383/terang.v1i1.136

Keywords:

secondhand clothes, skin diseases, consumer protection

Abstract

The proliferation of imported used clothing trade is due to clothes sold having foreign brands at cheap prices so that people who want to stay fashionable prefer imported used clothes because they are considered more affordable. The Clinical Pathology Laboratory of Muhammadiyah University Surabaya stated that used clothing samples contained mold or yeast fungi, Staphylococcus aureus bacteria, Escherichia coli bacteria and HPV (Human Papilloma Virus). This study aims to investigate the regulations regarding the trade of secondhand clothing in Indonesia and explore the legal protection provided for consumers of secondhand clothing in the country. The study employed a normative juridical legal research method, utilizing both the statute approach and conceptual approach. It drew upon legal materials such as Law Number 8 of 1999, Law Number 36 of 2009, Law Number 7 of 2014, and Minister of Trade Regulation No. 18 of 2021. The initial finding of the research was that the importation of secondhand clothing in Indonesia has been prohibited under Minister of Trade Regulation No. 18 of 2021, Article 2, paragraph (3), while local secondhand clothing businesses are permitted based on the Indonesian Business Field Standard Classification (KBLI) with code 47742. Secondly, legal protection for secondhand clothing consumers in Indonesia has been regulated in Law Number 8 of 1999. One of the consumer rights that needs to be fulfilled in consumer protection is the right to compensation for losses suffered by consumers based on Article 4 number 8, Article 7 letter f, and Article 19 paragraph (1).

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Amalia, Yunita, dan Anisyah Al Faqir. “Cerita Korban Kapok Thrifting Setelah Kena Herpes.” Merdeka.com. Last modified 2023. https://www.merdeka.com/uang/cerita-korban-kapok-thrifting-setelah-kenaherpes. html.

Anonim. “KBLI 47742.” Badan Pusat Statistik. Last modified 2017. https://www.bps.go.id/klasifikasi/app/view/kbli2017/47742.

Aprinaldi, Kastulani, dan Nur Hidayat. “Studi Komparatif Peredaran Barang Impor Bekas Berdasarkan Peraturan Menteri Perdagangan Nomor: 51/M-Dag/Per/7/2015 Dengan Peraturan Menteri Keuangan Nomor: 6/Pmk.010/2022.” Journal Of Sharia and Law Vol 2 No 2, no. 2 (n.d.): 536–555.

Diahwahyuningtyas, Alicia. “Ramai Soal Jamur Kapang yang Muncul di Baju Bekas Impor, Apa Itu?” Kompas.com. Last modified 2023. https://www.kompas.com/tren/read/2023/03/21/200500465/ramai-soal-jamur-kapang-yang-muncul-di-baju-bekas-impor-apa-itu-?page=all.

Djojodirdjo, M. A. Moegni. Perbuatan Melawan Hukum. Jakarta: Pradnya Paramita, 1976.

Henry. “Simak 3 Bahaya Beli Pakaian Bekas Impor Bekas Buat Kesehatan.” Liputan6. Last modified 2023. Diakses April 9, 2023. https://www.liputan6.com/lifestyle/read/5239924/simak-3-bahaya-beli-pakaian-bekas-impor-bekas-buat-kesehatan#google_vignette.

Indonesia, Republik. Undang-Undang Nomor 36 Tahun 2009 tentang Kesehatan. Indonesia, 2009.

———. Undang-Undang Nomor 7 Tahun 2014 tentang Perdagangan. Indonesia, 2014.

———. Undang-Undang Nomor 8 Tahun 1999 tentang Perlindungan Konsumen. Indonesia, 1999.

Kansil. Kamus Istilah Aneka Hukum. Jakarta: Jala Permata Aksara, 2010.

Lina, dan Haryanto F. Rosyid. “PERILAKU KONSUMTIF BERDASAR LOCUS O F CONTROL PADA REMAJA PUTRI Lina.” Psikologika 2, no. 4 (1997): 5–13. journal.uii.ac.id.

Otih Handayani. “Kontroversi Sanksi Denda Pada Vaksinasi Covid-19 Dalam Perspektif Undang-Undang No. 36 Tahun 2009 Tentang Kesehatan.” Krtha Bhayangkara 15, no. 1 (2021): 84–102.

Wahyuni, Niniek. “Perlindungan Hukum Bagi Konsumen Melalui Penyelesaian Sengketa Akibat Janji Iklan Perumahan.” Transparansi Hukum 1, no. 1 (2018): 19–36.