Pertanggungjawaban Direksi BUMN dalam Perspektif Corporate Governance Atas Kerugian Keuangan Negara
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.62383/terang.v2i4.1462Keywords:
SOEs, Corporate Governance, Directors, Corporate Losses, Business Judgment Rule, Legal Accountability.Abstract
The revision of the State-Owned Enterprises (SOE) Law fundamentally changes the concept of SOE losses by emphasizing that losses incurred in SOE operations constitute corporate losses, not state financial losses. This change has a direct impact on the construction of directors' accountability, which has often been associated with corruption when companies experience losses. This study aims to analyze the provisions of SOE directors' responsibilities based on Good Corporate Governance (GCG) principles within the new regulatory framework, as well as to examine the application of sanctions against directors who violate these principles and cause corporate losses. The study uses normative legal methods with statutory, conceptual, and case-based approaches. The analysis was conducted by examining the provisions of the Limited Liability Company Law, the revised SOE Law, related implementing regulations, and several important decisions, such as those concerning Jiwasraya, Asabri, Garuda Indonesia, and Pertamina-TPPI. The results show that the principles of GCG, fiduciary duty, and the Business Judgment Rule are the primary instruments in assessing directors' actions. Civil and administrative sanctions are the first line of defense for assessing directors' accountability, while criminal sanctions can only be imposed if there is an element of abuse of authority, conflict of interest, or other fraudulent acts. This research emphasizes the need for a clear distinction between business risks and unlawful acts to prevent directors from being criminalized for business decisions made in good faith and in accordance with good corporate governance principles. These findings are expected to serve as a reference in formulating state-owned enterprise policies and promoting more proportionate law enforcement against directors.
Downloads
References
Adami Chazawi, Hukum Pidana Korupsi (Malang: Bayumedia, 2019)
Ahmad Fikri Assegaf, Hukum Perusahaan dan Pemisahan Kekayaan Negara (Jakarta: Rajawali Pers, 2021)
Ahmad Yani, Hukum Perseroan Terbatas di Indonesia (Jakarta: Graha Ilmu, 2020)
Arrofii, D. Y. T., & Muhammad, S. A. (2025). Implementasi Prinsip Good Corporate Governance dalam Pencegahan Tindak Pidana Korupsi di BUMN. Padjadjaran Law Review, 13(1), 47-59.
Bambang Prabowo, “Pertanggungjawaban Direksi dalam Korporasi,” Jurnal Hukum Eksekutif 12, no. 2 (2021)
Black, Bainbridge, and Henderson, Business Judgment Rule in Modern Corporate Law (New York: Foundation Press, 2019)
BPKP, Pedoman Tata Kelola BUMN (Jakarta: BPKP, 2019)
Dairani, D. (2023). Strategi pencegahan tindak pidana korupsi pada pemilu dan pilkada serentak 2024. HUKMY: Jurnal Hukum, 3(1), 346-363.
Erman Rajagukguk, Hukum dan Ekonomi dalam Kebijakan Publik (Jakarta: UI Press, 2018)
Firdaus, A., Syaputra, M. Y. A., & Dirkareshza, R. (2022). Optimalisasi Good Corporate Governance Penguatan BUMN dalam Perlindungan Keuangan Negara. Mahadi: Indonesia Journal of Law, 1(1), 96-111.
Herwibowo, B. H., Maryano, M., & Mau, H. A. (2025). Kepastian Hukum Kewenangan Diskresi Direksi BUMN dalam Perspektif Prinsip Good Corporate Governance. Cendekia: Jurnal Penelitian dan Pengkajian Ilmiah, 2(8), 1491-1503.
Juliani, H. (2016). Pertanggungjawaban direksi BUMN terhadap perbuatan yang mengakibatkan kerugian keuangan negara. Masalah-Masalah Hukum, 45(4), 299-306.
Kejaksaan Agung RI, Berita Resmi Perkara Jiwasraya (Jakarta: Puspenkum, 2021)
Kejaksaan Agung RI, Ringkasan Perkara Jiwasraya dan Asabri (Jakarta: Pusat Penerangan Hukum, 2022)
Kementerian BUMN, Pedoman Pengawasan dan Evaluasi Direksi BUMN (Jakarta: KemenBUMN, 2021)
Komite Nasional Kebijakan Governance, Pedoman GCG Indonesia (Jakarta: KNKG, 2006)
Laporan Investigasi Kemenkeu dan OJK atas Kasus Garuda Indonesia 2019
Laporan Kejaksaan Agung RI tentang Perkara Asabri, 2022
Laporan Putusan Pengadilan Tipikor Pertamina–TPPI, PN Jakarta Pusat, 2016
Laporan Putusan Tipikor Pertamina–TPPI, PN Jakarta Pusat, 2016
Lubis, A. A. (2015). STATUS KERUGIAN BISNIS PERSEROAN YANG MENGAKIBATKAN KERUGIAN KEUANGAN NEGARA. Jurnal Ilmiah Penegakan Hukum, 2(2), 108-137.
Mokoginta, R. (2015). Analisis hukum bisnis tentang kerugian keuangan pada badan usaha milik negara (BUMN). Lex Crimen, 4(6).
Munir Fuady, Dewan Direksi dan Pertanggungjawabannya (Bandung: Citra Aditya Bakti, 2018)
Putri, T. A., & Sitabuana, T. H. (2022). Pengawasan Pengelolaan Keuangan Negara Terhadap Badan Usaha Milik Negara (Bumn). Sibatik Journal: Jurnal Ilmiah Bidang Sosial, Ekonomi, Budaya, Teknologi, Dan Pendidikan, 1(7), 1003-1018.
R. Subekti, Aspek Hukum Perdata dalam Perseroan (Jakarta: Pradnya Paramita, 2017)
Sigit Pamungkas, Hukum Keuangan Publik dan Kekayaan Negara yang Dipisahkan (Yogyakarta: Genta Press, 2022)
Suharto, F. T. (2022). Rekonstruksi Regulasi Kerugian Keuangan Negara Pada Perusahaan Badan Usaha Milik Negara Dalam Perspektif Tindak Pidana Korupsi Dan Doktrin Business Judgment Rule Yang Berbasis Keadilan Pancasila (Doctoral dissertation, UNIVERSITAS ISLAM SULTAN AGUNG).
Yahya Harahap, Hukum Perseroan Terbatas (Jakarta: Sinar Grafika, 2021)
Zudan Arif Fakrulloh, Hukum Administrasi Korporasi Negara (Jakarta: Prenada Media, 2020)
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Terang : Jurnal Kajian Ilmu Sosial, Politik dan Hukum
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
