Indonesian State Intelligence Agency’s Responsibility in Negligence Wiretapping Evidence of Terrorism Suspect

Authors

  • Aryasepta Syaelendra Universitas 17 Agustus 1945 Surabaya
  • Frans Simangunsong Universitas 17 Agustus 1945 Surabaya

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.62383/terang.v1i2.364

Keywords:

Wiretapping, State Intelligence Agency, Terorism

Abstract

Wiretapping evidence include in confidential evidence which need to be guarded and become State Intelligence needs for prove at trail court purpose, this become crutial to keep in mind this confidential evidence is State Intelligence’s responsibility to keep convidential secret. negligence nor deliberate State Intelligence personel in keeping wiretapping evidence that usually form as voice convertation record or personal text massages from suspects and/or terorism executant becomes important when it comes to confidential guarantee remembering it writtens on Undang – undang, proofing convidential evidence on court are needs to prove for the purpose of next investigation. State Intelligence can get permission doing wiretapping for the next six month untill undetermined time limit, Lack of laws in which regulates specifically regarding the responsibilities of the Intelligence Agency if negligence occurs in preserving evidence becomes important and not limited to code of ethics sanctions. Using normative juridical methods to find out the basic basis for the importance of updating the Intelligence Agency's code of ethics in accounting for the evidence carried by each personnel. Apart from that, this research also aims to determine the form of accountability of the State Intelligence Agency in its responsibilities.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Afifah, W. (2020). Urgency of wiretapping in getting evidence in criminal measures. DiH: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 16(2). https://doi.org/10.30996/dih.v16i2.3410

Eato, Y. N. (2017). Keabsahan alat bukti dan barang bukti pada perkara pidana. Lex Crimen, 6(2).

Fitria, R. A. (2017). Penyadapan sebagai alat bukti dalam tindak pidana umum berdasarkan hukum acara pidana. Mimbar Keadilan, 160. https://doi.org/10.30996/mk.v0i0.2192

Hadi, R. B. S. (n.d.). Batas keabsahan penyadapan terhadap pelaku tindak pidana terorisme dalam perspektif Hak Asasi Manusia (HAM).

Kristian, & Gunawan, Y. (2013). Sekelumit tentang penyadapan dalam hukum positif di Indonesia.

Kuncoro, W. (2019). Aparat pengawas intern pemerintah: Perannya dalam pengawasan intelijen yang akuntabel di Badan Intelijen Negara. JIIP: Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Pemerintahan, 4(2), 155–168.

Martono, B. S. (2020). Tinjauan hukum pidana terhadap Undang-Undang Nomor 17 Tahun 2011 tentang Intelijen Negara. Supremasi Hukum, 16(01), 88–98.

Marzuki, P. M., & Sh, M. S. (2021). Pengantar ilmu hukum. Prenada Media.

Sasangka, H., Rosita, L., & Hadiwijono, A. (1996). Penyidikan, penahanan, penuntutan dan praperadilan. Dharma Surya Berlian.

Siar, B. L. (2016). Sanksi pidana akibat tindakan membocorkan rahasia intelijen Negara Republik Indonesia. Lex Crimen, 5(3).

Sumariyastuti, S. H. D. (2019). Penyadapan dalam perspektif Hak Asasi Manusia. Yurispruden, 2(2). https://doi.org/10.33474/yur.v2i2.2229

Published

2024-06-15

How to Cite

Aryasepta Syaelendra, & Frans Simangunsong. (2024). Indonesian State Intelligence Agency’s Responsibility in Negligence Wiretapping Evidence of Terrorism Suspect. Terang : Jurnal Kajian Ilmu Sosial, Politik Dan Hukum, 1(2), 347–354. https://doi.org/10.62383/terang.v1i2.364

Similar Articles

1 2 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.