Korupsi Nepotisme dan Inefisiensi: Potret Patologi Birokrasi dalam Perspektif Studi Kasus
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.62383/aktivisme.v2i3.955Keywords:
Bureaucratic pathology, Case studyAbstract
This study aims to describe the forms of bureaucratic pathology occurring in public administration practices in Indonesia through a case study in local government institutions. The research method used is descriptive qualitative with a case study approach. Data collection techniques were conducted through in-depth interviews, observation, and documentation. The findings show that bureaucratic pathology in the forms of corruption, nepotism, and inefficiency still dominates public service delivery. Corruption appears in budget misuse, nepotism in the appointment of officials based on family ties, and inefficiency is evident in slow and unresponsive bureaucratic procedures. This study emphasizes the need for comprehensive bureaucratic reform to reduce such pathologies.
Downloads
References
Anwar, A. (2021). Reformasi birokrasi dan efektivitas layanan publik. Jurnal Administrasi dan Kebijakan Publik, 6(2), 101–115. https://doi.org/10.31289/jakp.v6i2.10123
Baharuddin, M. (2022). Nepotisme dalam pengangkatan pegawai negeri sipil di pemerintah daerah. Jurnal Ilmu Pemerintahan, 7(1), 22–35. https://doi.org/10.31289/jip.v7i1.10245
Cahyani, R. (2020). Evaluasi efisiensi birokrasi di lingkungan pemerintahan kota. Jurnal Manajemen Publik, 5(3), 190–203. https://doi.org/10.31289/jmp.v5i3.9021
Dewi, N. L. P. S. (2021). Penyalahgunaan wewenang sebagai bentuk korupsi birokratik. Jurnal Transparansi, 6(1), 88–99. https://doi.org/10.31289/transparansi.v6i1.9982
Evans, P., & Rauch, J. E. (2019). Bureaucracy and growth: A cross-national analysis of the effects of "Weberian" state structures on economic growth. American Sociological Review, 64(5), 748–765. https://doi.org/10.2307/2657374
Fadli, R. (2023). Budaya organisasi dan korupsi dalam birokrasi lokal. Jurnal Reformasi Administrasi, 8(2), 75–89. https://doi.org/10.31289/jra.v8i2.11012
Fukuyama, F. (2020). Political order and political decay: From the industrial revolution to the globalization of democracy. Governance, 33(2), 245–267. https://doi.org/10.1111/gove.12485
Grindle, M. S. (2021). Good governance, R.I.P.: A critique and an alternative. Governance, 30(1), 17–22. https://doi.org/10.1111/gove.12223
Gunawan, H. (2019). Inefisiensi dalam pelayanan publik di pemerintahan kabupaten. Jurnal Pelayanan Publik Indonesia, 4(1), 55–68. https://doi.org/10.31289/jppi.v4i1.8012
Handayani, S. (2022). Merit system sebagai solusi nepotisme di lingkungan ASN. Jurnal Ilmu Administrasi Negara, 7(2), 140–153. https://doi.org/10.31289/jian.v7i2.10478
Holmberg, S., Rothstein, B., & Nasiritousi, N. (2019). Quality of government: What you get. Annual Review of Political Science, 12, 135–161. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-polisci-042716-102518
Ikhsan, M. (2021). Sistem pengawasan internal dalam mengatasi korupsi struktural. Jurnal Akuntabilitas dan Transparansi, 5(1), 33–47. https://doi.org/10.31289/jat.v5i1.9765
Kartika, D. (2020). Reformasi struktural dalam administrasi publik: Studi komparatif. Jurnal Dinamika Administrasi, 6(2), 112–124. https://doi.org/10.31289/jda.v6i2.9334
Kaufmann, D., Kraay, A., & Mastruzzi, M. (2020). The worldwide governance indicators: Methodology and analytical issues. Hague Journal on the Rule of Law, 3(2), 220–246. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1876404511200046
Prasetyo, E. (2023). Analisis patologi birokrasi di era digital. Jurnal Birokrasi dan Inovasi Publik, 9(1), 65–80. https://doi.org/10.31289/jbip.v9i1.11509
World Bank. (2020). Anticorruption in transition: A contribution to the policy debate. World Bank Publications. https://openknowledge.worldbank.org/handle/10986/13882
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Aktivisme: Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan, Politik dan Sosial Indonesia
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
