Tindak Pidana Pencurian Anak Terkait dengan Undang-Undang Nomor 11 Tahun 2012 Tentang Sistem Peradilan Anak

Studi Kasus Putusan Nomor : 9/PID SUS.A/2019/PN.BKL

Authors

  • Erva Yunita Universitas Pembangunan Nasional Veteran Jakarta
  • Handar Subhandi Bakhtiar Universitas Pembangunan Nasional Veteran Jakarta

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.62383/amandemen.v2i1.651

Keywords:

Criminal acts, child theft, Juvenile Justice System

Abstract

The author in writing raised the case on Decision Number: 9/Pid.Sus.A/2019/PN.Bkl, where the defendant Ropik Bin Sukkur was found guilty of committing the crime of theft of a blue and white Beat motorcycle for his actions, the defendant was sentenced to 3 (three) years. three) months and did not get a diversion attempt. For this reason, the author will examine how the criminal imposition of criminal acts of theft of article 363 of the Criminal Code committed by minors in terms of Law Number 11 of 2012 concerning the Juvenile Criminal Justice System and how the judge's considerations in imposing a crime against the perpetrators of the crime of theft of article 363 of the Criminal Code in terms of the perspective of restorative justice, the research method used in this author is the normative juridical method of library law research carried out by researching library materials or secondary data, sentencing refers to the theory of relative punishment where the purpose of sentencing is as a means of improvement for the accused. itself, while the judge's considerations refer to two aspects, namely juridical and non-juridical aspects, juridical aspects refer to Article 362 of the Criminal Code and noin juridical refers to mitigating and aggravating matters.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Andi Hamzah, Sistem Pidana dan Pemidanaan Indonesia, Pradnya Paramita, Jakarta, 1993.

Andrea Ata Ujan, Filsafat Hukum: Membangun Hukum, Membela Keadilan, Kanisius, Yogyakarta, 2009.

Arif Gosita, Masalah perlindungan Anak, Sinar Grafika, Jakarta , 1992.

Barda Nawawi Arif dalam Waluyadi, Hukum Perlindungan Anak, Mandar Maju,Bandung,2009.

Diah Ratna Sari Hariyanto, Paradigma Keadilan Restoratif Dalam Putusan Hakim, Jurnal Kertha Patrika, Vol. 42, No. 2 Agustus 2020.

H.A.K. Moch. Anwar, Hukum Pidana Bagian Khusus (KUHP Buku II), Citra Aditya Bakti, Cet.ke-6, Bandung, 1989.

Immaculata Anindya Karisa, Analisis Pertimbangan Hakim Dalam Penjatuhan Pidana Terhadap Tindak Pidana Pencabulan Oleh Anak (Studi Kasus Putusan Pengadilan Negeri Klaten Nomor: 35/Pid.Sus.Anak/2014.Pn.Kln) Jurnal Verstek Vol. 8 No. 1,

Lilik Mulyadi, Pengadilan Anak di Indonesia, (Teori Praktek dan Permsalahannya) Mandar Maju, Bandung, 2005.

Maulana Hasan Wadong, Advokasi Dan Hukum Perlindungan Anak, Grasindo, Jakarta, 2000.

Muladi, Lembaga Pidana Bersyarat, Alumni, Bandung, 2002.

Pingkan V. Tambalean, Penegakan Hukum Atas Tindak Pidana Pencurian Yang Dilakukan Oleh Anak Di Bawah Umur, Lex et Societatis, Vol. I/No.2/Apr-Jun/2013.

Samosir, Djisman, Fungsi Pidana Penjara dalam Sistem Pemidanaan di Indonesia. Bina Cipta, Bandung, 1992.

Soerjono Soekanto dan Sri Mahmudji, Penelitian Hukum Normatif, Suatu Tinjauan Singkat, (Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada, 2003.

Sudarto, Hukum Pidana Jilid 1 A-B, Fakultas Hukum Diponegoro, Semarang, 1975.

Wirjono Prodjodikoro, Tindak-Tindak Pidana Tertentu di Indonesia, Refika Aditama, Bandung, 2010.

Downloads

Published

2024-12-05

How to Cite

Erva Yunita, & Handar Subhandi Bakhtiar. (2024). Tindak Pidana Pencurian Anak Terkait dengan Undang-Undang Nomor 11 Tahun 2012 Tentang Sistem Peradilan Anak : Studi Kasus Putusan Nomor : 9/PID SUS.A/2019/PN.BKL. Amandemen: Jurnal Ilmu Pertahanan, Politik Dan Hukum Indonesia, 2(1), 25–37. https://doi.org/10.62383/amandemen.v2i1.651

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.