Efektivitas Praperadilan dalam Membatalkan Penetapan Tersangka
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.62383/terang.v2i2.1138Keywords:
Pretrial, Determination of Suspects, Human Rights Protection, Legal CertaintyAbstract
Pretrial is an important instrument in the Indonesian criminal justice system that serves as a control mechanism against arbitrary actions of law enforcement officials, especially in the determination of suspect status. This study aims to analyze the effectiveness of pretrial institution in overturning invalid suspect determination and its impact on the protection of human rights and legal certainty. The method used is normative legal research with legislative approach and case study. The results of the study show that although pretrial has been strengthened through Constitutional Court Decision No. 21/PUU-XII/2014, in practice its effectiveness is still limited due to inconsistency of decisions, lack of access to investigation documents, and potential abuse by certain parties. Pre-trial decisions that invalidate suspect determinations have a substantive impact in upholding the principle of presumption of innocence and due process of law. However, in order for it to function optimally, reform of KUHAP, training of judges, digitization of the judicial process, and strong public oversight are required. Thus, pretrial can play a strategic role in maintaining substantive justice and the integrity of the legal system in Indonesia.
Downloads
References
Asikin, Z. (2023). Keadilan prosedural dalam sistem hukum pidana Indonesia. Penerbit Hukum Progresif.
Asshiddiqie, J. (2019). Konstitusi dan hak asasi manusia.
Asshiddiqie, J. (2021). Hukum acara pidana dan perlindungan konstitusional tersangka.
Azhar, H. (2020). Catatan kritis atas praperadilan: Antara harapan dan formalitas.
Barendt, E. (2010). An introduction to constitutional law. Oxford University Press.
Budiman, A. (2023). Perlindungan hak tersangka melalui praperadilan. Genta Publishing.
Hamzah, A. (2020). Asas-asas hukum pidana. Sinar Grafika.
Harahap, M. Y. (2016). Praperadilan dalam praktik. Sinar Grafika.
Harahap, M. Y. (2023). Problematika praperadilan dalam praktik peradilan pidana. Alumni.
ICJR. (2023). Evaluasi peran praperadilan dalam perlindungan hak tersangka: Studi kasus di Jakarta dan Surabaya. Institute for Criminal Justice Reform.
Isra, S. (2011). Mahkamah Konstitusi dan pembaruan ketatanegaraan Indonesia. Jurnal Konstitusi, 8(4), 785–810. https://mkri.id/index.php?page=web.Jurnal&id=1
Lestari, D. P. (2021). Praperadilan dan batasan kewenangannya pasca Putusan MK No. 21/PUU-XII/2014. Jurnal Hukum & Peradilan, 10(1), 45–62. https://doi.org/10.25216/JHP.10.1.2021.45-62
Lestari, N. D. (2023). Inkonstistensi putusan praperadilan di Indonesia: Problematika dan solusinya. Jurnal Hukum & Peradilan, 12(2), 225–242. https://doi.org/10.25216/jhp.2023.12.2.225-242
Marzuki, P. M. (2021). Penelitian hukum. Kencana.
Marzuki, S. (2019). Bantuan hukum dan akses keadilan: Catatan kritis terhadap peradilan pidana.
Minarno, N. B. (2022). Ketimpangan akses bukti dalam praperadilan.
Muladi. (2019). Hak asasi manusia, politik, dan sistem peradilan pidana. Refika Aditama.
Nasution, A. (2020). Due process of law dan perlindungan hak tersangka. Rajawali Pers.
Purba, J. T. (2024). Taktik hukum dalam pengajuan praperadilan oleh tersangka elit. Jurnal Etika Hukum, 6(2), 123–139. https://doi.org/10.36745/JEH.6.2.2024.123
Putusan MK No. 21/PUU-XII/2014. (2014). Mahkamah Konstitusi Republik Indonesia.
Ramadhan, T. A. (2024). Keterbatasan waktu dalam pemeriksaan praperadilan: Antara efisiensi dan efektivitas. Jurnal Peradilan Indonesia, 14(1), 88–104. https://doi.org/10.33255/JPI.14.1.2024.88
Sari, R. A. (2022). Praperadilan sebagai alat komersialisasi hukum: Studi kritis terhadap putusan-putusan PN. Jurnal Hukum Pro Justitia, 40(3), 198–210. https://doi.org/10.24843/PJH.2022.v40.i03.p03
Smith, R. (2022). Due process and the criminal trial: Comparative insights. Hart Publishing.
Supomo, S. (2022). Interpretasi hakim dalam pengujian alat bukti permulaan: Studi kasus praperadilan di Jakarta Selatan. Jurnal Yustisia, 11(3), 199–216. https://doi.org/10.26740/yustisia.v11n3.2022.199
Sutrisno, R. A. (2023). Transformasi digital peradilan: Dari konvensional menuju elektronik. Kominfo Press.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Terang : Jurnal Kajian Ilmu Sosial, Politik dan Hukum
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
