Penjatuhan Putusan Pidana Bersyarat dalam Mencapai Tujuan Pemidanaan dalam Sistem Peradilan Pidana (Studi di Pengadilan Negeri Marisa)

Authors

  • Nuryanto D. Nusa Universitas Gorontalo
  • Nurwita Ismail Universitas Gorontalo
  • Robby W. Amu Universitas Gorontalo

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.62383/terang.v1i2.234

Keywords:

Conditional Criminal, Punishment, Criminal Justice System

Abstract

The purpose of this research is to find out and analyze the basis of the judge's consideration in imposing a conditional criminal sentence at the Marisa Court, Pohuwato Regency and to find out and analyze the provisions of conditional punishment in achieving the objectives of punishment in the Indonesian punishment system. The implementation of this research is empris research. In this study, researchers used a qualitative method. The consideration of judges in imposing conditional criminal decisions is a complex and diverse process. It involves an evaluation of the offender's circumstances, community safety, rehabilitation needs, as well as the effectiveness of the punishment in preventing future law violations. By carefully considering these factors, judges can make fair and effective decisions. The judiciary is known as the mouthpiece of the law. Conditional punishment in the Indonesian punishment system can be implemented where the Judge can set a general condition, namely that the convicted person during the specified probation period will not commit a criminal act, and a special condition, which is specifically aimed at the behavior of the convicted person. Conditional punishment can be imposed if the Judge imposes a maximum imprisonment of 1 (one) year.  Conditional punishment is an important instrument in the Indonesian punishment system because it provides an opportunity for criminal offenders to rehabilitate themselves and avoid re-engaging in criminal activities.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Andi Hamzah. (1983). Andi Hamzah dan Siti Rahayu, Suatu Tinjauan Ringkas Sistem Pemidanaan di Indonesia. Jakarta: Akademika Pressindo.

Bartollas, C. (1985). Correctial Treatment, Theory and Practice. New Jersey: Prentice-Hall.

Hukum Online. (Diakses Tanggal, 19 November 2023). http://www.hukumonline.com.

Kartanegara, Satochid. (1954). Kumpulan Catatan Kuliah Hukum Pidana II. 1954-1955.

Muladi. (2008). Lembaga Pidana Bersyarat. Bandung: Alumni.

Rachwell, R. (2020). Penjatuhan pidana bersyarat terhadap kecelakaan Lalu lintas yang menyebabkan kematian ditinjau dari Undang-undang nomor 22 tahun 2009. Jurnal Hukum Adigama, 3(1).

Sapto Handoyo D.P. (2018). Pelaksanaan pidana bersyarat Dalam sistem pemidanaan di indonesia. Pakuan Law Review, 4(1), Januari-Juni.

Satochid Kartanegara. (1965). Hukum Pidana: Kumpulan Kuliah. Jakarta: Balai Lektur Mahasiswa.

Soleman, F., Pangkerego, O. A., & Sompie, E. (2021). Syarat Penjatuhan Pidana Percobaan Dalam Sistem Pemidanaan Di Indonesia. Lex Crimen, 10(7), Jun.

Waluyo, B. (2000). Pidana dan Pemidanaan. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika.

Zulfa, E. A. (2011). Pergeseran Paradigma Pemidanaan. Bandung: Lubuk Agung.

Published

2024-05-20

How to Cite

Nusa, N. D., Ismail, N., & Amu, R. W. (2024). Penjatuhan Putusan Pidana Bersyarat dalam Mencapai Tujuan Pemidanaan dalam Sistem Peradilan Pidana (Studi di Pengadilan Negeri Marisa). Terang : Jurnal Kajian Ilmu Sosial, Politik Dan Hukum, 1(2), 247–265. https://doi.org/10.62383/terang.v1i2.234

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 5 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.