Efektivitas Omnibus Law terhadap Perlindungan Tenaga Medis di Indonesia dalam Perbandingan dengan Sistem Hukum Malaysia

Authors

  • Maryanto Maryanto Universitas Pembangunan Nasional Veteran Jakarta
  • Handar Subhandi Bakhtiar Universitas Pembangunan Nasional Veteran Jakarta
  • Muthia Sakti Universitas Pembangunan Nasional Veteran Jakarta

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.62383/demokrasi.v2i3.1017

Keywords:

health law, comparison, occupational safety, Indonesia, Malaysia

Abstract

The comparison of health law between Indonesia andMalaysia covers critical aspects of the healthcare system that influence the quality of life of their citizens. This study primarily focuses on occupational health and safety (OHS) for healthcare workers. According to global data, Malaysia has a better healthcare system compared to Indonesia, as reflected in its higher ranking on the Health Care Index. In Indonesia,health law regulations often undergo changes and revisions,such as the enactment of the Omnibus Law, which consolidates various health sector regulations. However, this has raised concerns about the diminishing legal protection for healthcare workers. In contrast, Malaysia presents a more structured system, with the integration of health and labor institutions through the Department of Occupational Safety And Health (DOSH), which ensures better workplace safety and clearer standards. This research adopts a descriptive qualitative approach by analyzing legal documents such as Law Number 17 of 2023 on Health in Indonesia and the Occupational Safety and Health Act in Malaysia. The Malaysian approach is more preventive and promotive in nature, differing from Indonesia’s curative-dominated model. The study aims to compare the legal health regulations of both countries, assess their implementation effectiveness, and offer policy recommendations based on best practices applied inMalaysia to improve the quality of healthcare services inIndonesia. The findings reveal that although Indonesia has significant potential in the health sector, weak regulation implementation and supervision remain major obstacles. Therefore, a more structured and efficient regulatory reform is needed to enhance legal protection for healthcare workers and improve health services.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Abidin, Z. (2023). RUU “Omnibus Law” kesehatan versus uniknya profesi dokter. Ikatan Dokter Indonesia. https://www.idionline.org/article/ruu-omnibus-law-kesehatan-versus-uniknya-profesi-dokter

Anjelina, D. (2024). Perbandingan mekanisme asuransi kesehatan pemerintahan: Studi kasus: Indonesia dan Malaysia. PUBLIKA: Jurnal Ilmu Administrasi Publik, 10(2), 1–10.

Darmayanti, E. (2018). Perlindungan hukum terhadap pelaksanaan keselamatan dan kesehatan kerja (K3) pada perusahaan. Jurnal Cendekia Hukum, 3(2), 286.

Hamid, A. R. A., et al. (2019). Noncompliance of the occupational safety and health legislation in the Malaysian construction industry. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 220, 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/220/1/012034

Jamaluddin, S. Z. (2013). Undang-undang pekerjaan di Malaysia: Perbincangan kes-kes. Penerbit Universiti Malaya.

Masrully. (2019). Menakar implementasi kebijakan keselamatan dan kesehatan kerja di Indonesia (Studi kasus: UU Nomor 1 Tahun 1970). Jurnal Wacana Kinerja, 22(1), 1–15.

McKenzie, B. (2023). Indonesia: Health Omnibus Law series – Key updates on pharmaceutical preparation and medical device provisions. Baker McKenzie.

Mustika Pamungkas, S. H., Nuridin, & Kanti Rahayu. (2022). Hukum keselamatan dan kesehatan kerja bagi pekerja proyek konstruksi: Perbandingan Indonesia dan Malaysia. PT Nasya Expanding Management (Penerbit NEM).

Putri, R. N. (2019). Perbandingan sistem kesehatan di negara berkembang dan negara maju. Jurnal Ilmiah Universitas Batanghari Jambi, 19(1), 139–146.

Simatupang, J. R., & Fahmi, S. (2023). Efektivitas penggunaan media telemedicine berdasarkan hukum Indonesia dan Malaysia. Jurnal Hukum Samudra Keadilan, 18(1), 15–32.

Sugiyono. (2019). Metode penelitian kuantitatif, kualitatif, dan R&D. Alfabeta.

Surasak Buranatrevedh, M. D. (2015). Occupational safety and health management among five ASEAN countries: Thailand, Indonesia, Malaysia, Philippines, and Singapore. Journal of the Medical Association of Thailand, 98(Suppl. 2), S1–S7.

Syofyan, Y., & Gusman, D. (2023). Studi perbandingan sistem jaminan sosial antara Indonesia dan Malaysia dalam rangka pemenuhan hak kesehatan di Indonesia. UNES Journal of Swara Justisia, 7(1), 208–219.

Triswandana, W. G. E., & Armaen, N. K. (2020). Penilaian risiko K3 konstruksi dengan metode HIRARC. Jurnal Fakultas Teknik dan Perencanaan Universitas Warmadewa, 4(1), 1–10.

Tsunematsu, N. O., & Lee, Y. Y. (2024). Undang-undang keselamatan dan kesehatan kerja tahun 1994 (Malaysia): Perkenalan. https://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=352d2d89-6b2d-4dcf-a04a-3400040b48c9

Umar, N. (2013). Studi hukum perbandingan sistem ketatanegaraan Malaysia dan Indonesia. Jurnal IAIN Ambon: Tahkim, 9(2), 1–10.

Downloads

Published

2025-06-07

How to Cite

Maryanto Maryanto, Handar Subhandi Bakhtiar, & Muthia Sakti. (2025). Efektivitas Omnibus Law terhadap Perlindungan Tenaga Medis di Indonesia dalam Perbandingan dengan Sistem Hukum Malaysia. Demokrasi: Jurnal Riset Ilmu Hukum, Sosial Dan Politik, 2(3), 88–99. https://doi.org/10.62383/demokrasi.v2i3.1017