Objektivitas Berita Kompas.com dalam Rubrik “Indeks Terpopuler” dalam Pemberitaan “100 Hari Kerja Prabowo-Gibran”
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.62383/demokrasi.v2i3.1079Keywords:
Content Analysis, Kompas.com, ObjectivityAbstract
News objectivity serves as a crucial foundation for maintaining media integrity amid the digital information flow. This study aims to analyze the objectivity of news coverage by Kompas.com in the “Most Popular Index” section concerning the “First 100 Days of Prabowo-Gibran.” The research employs a descriptive qualitative method with a case study approach and content analysis based on Westerstahl’s objectivity model, which includes the dimensions of factuality and impartiality. The findings indicate that the news coverage demonstrates a high level of factual accuracy and relevance, with information that is accurate, comprehensive, and sourced from credible references. The neutrality of news presentation is also maintained, free from evaluative or sensational elements. However, the aspect of balance still requires improvement, as most articles present only a single point of view. Kompas.com’s reporting on this topic can be considered objective in terms of factuality and neutrality, though the inclusion of diverse perspectives remains an important note for strengthening overall objectivity.
Downloads
References
Badan Kepegawaian Negara. (2023). Peraturan Presiden Nomor 21 Tahun 2023 tentang Hari Kerja dan Jam Kerja Instansi Pemerintah dan Pegawai Aparatur Sipil Negara. Badan Kepegawaian Negara.
Creswell, J. W., & Creswel, D. J. (2018). The three approaches to research. In Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (5th ed.). Sage Publications.
Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2017). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. Sage Publisher.
Creswell. (2013). Collecting data. In Qualitative research five approach (pp. 190–195).
Firmas, M. A., & Maesarani, I. W. (2011). Evaluasi reformasi demokrasi: Masalah politisasi birokrasi dalam politik Indonesia. Jurnal Kebijakan dan Manajemen PNS, 5(2).
Grant, M. D., Flores, A., Pedersen, E. J., Sherman, D. K., & Van Boven, L. (2021). When election expectations fail: Polarized perceptions of election legitimacy increase with accumulating evidence of election outcomes and with polarized media. PLOS ONE, 16(12), e0259473. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0259473
Hermanto, A. B. (2020). Etika berdemokrasi Pancasila dalam konstestasi politik di era digitalisasi. Jurnal Universitas Pancasila, 3(1), 112–118.
Knudsen, E., & Johannesson, M. P. (2019). Beyond the limits of survey experiments: How conjoint designs advance causal inference in political communication research. Political Communication, 36(2), 259–271. https://doi.org/10.1080/10584609.2018.1493009
Lamadang, K. P., Karlina, D. A., Nuraini, R. Z., & Febriani, W. D. (n.d.). Isu dan kebijakan global politisasi pendidikan. Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Holistik (JIPH), 1(2), 63–76. https://doi.org/10.55927
Michael, J., Sebanz, N., & Knoblich, G. (2016). The sense of commitment: A minimal approach. Frontiers in Psychology, 6(JAN). https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01968
Muhaimin, A., & Rahmadini, M. (2018). Pola komunikasi organisasi dalam pengembangan program studi ilmu komunikasi Fakultas Ilmu Sosial dan Ilmu Politik Universitas Islam Negeri Raden Fatah Palembang. Jurnal Studi Sosial dan Politik, 2(2).
Pink, B. (2021). Pemerintah targetkan kemiskinan ekstrem di Indonesia hilang pada 2024.
Sari, S., & Setiyono, J. (2022). The development of green investment and its policies in the regulation of the Indonesian government. Lambung Mangkurat Law Journal, 7(2), 118–131. https://doi.org/10.32801/lamlaj.v7i2.349
Tommy, G. (2022, January 16). Understanding social media polarization. Kompasiana, 11–23.
Utomo, A. S., & Karunianingsih, D. A. (2020). Etika komunikasi publik bagi humas pemerintah dalam bermedia sosial. Jurnal Heritage, 8(2), 127–144.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Demokrasi: Jurnal Riset Ilmu Hukum, Sosial dan Politik
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
